Risk Burndown Charts

5 minutes 5 Questions

Risk Burndown Charts provide a visual representation of the reduction in risks over the project life cycle. These charts show the number of identified risks, their severity levels, and how they are mitigated or eliminated over time. The purpose of a Risk Burndown Chart is to track risk trends, analyze their impact on project progress, and ensure that the team is actively addressing risks throughout each iteration. This helps in making informed decisions about risk management strategies and improves project predictability.

Guide to Risk Burndown Charts in Agile Risk Management

Risk Burndown Charts are essential tools in Agile Risk Management. They represent a graphical portrayal of risk exposure over time, which helps in monitoring and controlling risks in an Agile Project Management.

These charts are important because they provide a visual representation of the reduction in risk over time. This helps stakeholders and team members to understand the progress against risks and facilitates effective decision-making.

How it Works:
Risk Burndown Charts work on the principle of tracking and reducing risk over time or as iterations proceed. A typical Risk Burndown Chart includes the iteration or time period on the x-axis and the amount of risk on the y-axis. The chart plots points representing the total risk exposure at the end of each iteration.

The primary expectation is to see the risk go down or 'burn down' over time as actions are taken to address them.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Risk Burndown Charts:
1. Understand the Concept: Make sure you deeply understand the principle and workings of Risk Burndown Charts before the exam.
2. Explanation: Be prepared to explain the concept, its purpose, and how it helps in Agile Risk Management.
3. Drawing the Chart: Practice drawing a sample Risk Burndown Chart and explaining each component.
4. Real-world Application: Be ready to discuss real-world examples where Risk Burndown Chart can be applied and how it would affect the outcome.
5. Interpretation: Interpretation of a Risk Burndown Chart is crucial. Be prepared to interpret a given chart in the exam and make strategic decisions based on it.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

Question 1

A project with multiple interdependencies presents a consistently increasing risk burndown chart. Which of the following actions is recommended?

Increase the project budget to accommodate the risks Change the project management method to Waterfall Temporarily halt the project to address dependencies Conduct an interdependencies analysis and re-prioritize risk mitigation efforts Allocate resources to the most critical tasks regardless of the backlog Prepare exit strategies and risk transfer options

Correct Answer: Conduct an interdependencies analysis and re-prioritize risk mitigation efforts

An interdependencies analysis can help in identifying the root cause of increasing risks in the chart, allowing the project manager to re-prioritize risk mitigation efforts accordingly and address the underlying issues.

Question 2

You notice frequent fluctuations in the risk burndown chart, showing reduction and increase in risks alternatively. What could be the probable concerns for these fluctuations?

It might indicate instability in the project, poor risk management, and uncertainty about requirements. This indicates very efficient risk management. The project is perfectly stable and the fluctuations are industry standard. There were no risks at all and it's a charting error.

Correct Answer: It might indicate instability in the project, poor risk management, and uncertainty about requirements.

The correct answer suggests that frequent fluctuations in the risk burndown chart indicate instability in the project, poor risk management, and uncertainty about requirements. This assertion makes sense as a stable project is expected to show continual reduction in the risk burndown chart as risks should be identified and mitigated over time. Rising risks suggest new uncertainties or unaddressed problems. The other options are not correct because a good risk management plan would not exhibit frequent fluctuations and such variations are not an industry standard in a stable project. The possibility of a charting error should be considered as least likely, unless there are obvious reasons to question the accuracy of the chart.

Question 3

The risk burndown chart shows that high-risk items frequently enter and exit the chart. How can the project manager address this volatility?

Overestimate the risk values to avoid removing them Track risks using a different chart or tool Ignore the issue since it is bound to happen in any project Shorten the sprint length to decrease the chances of encountering risks Add more resources to the project to increase the risk management effort Conduct proactive risk identification and assessment during sprint planning

Correct Answer: Conduct proactive risk identification and assessment during sprint planning

The volatility of high-risk items on the chart indicates a need for better risk identification and assessment during sprint planning. Proactive risk identification can help the project manager address these risks early on and avoid frequent changes.

Go Premium