Inspections

5 minutes 5 Questions

Inspections are a technique used in Feature Driven Development to ensure the quality and accuracy of code, designs, and other project deliverables. Regular inspections involve the review and evaluation of features, code, or other work products by a team of qualified peers. The inspection process helps to identify defects, misunderstandings, and areas for improvement, enabling the team to address issues early in the development process. Inspections can be both formal and informal, creating a culture of continuous learning and improvement within the team and ensuring a high level of quality in the final product.

Inspections in Feature Driven Development

What is it:
Inspections, in the context of Feature Driven Development (FDD) within Agile Project Management, are formal reviews of design and code components done for checking the product's functionality and quality, before moving it into later stages.

Why it is important:
Inspections are crucial to identify bugs early, enhance code quality, uphold coding standards, and maintain oversight on the project's progress. These protect from costly corrections required in later stages, ensuring that the project is on track and aligned with the end user's requirements.

How it works:
An inspection team, composed of project members with different roles, scrutinize the work-product or code. The prime objective is to find issues rather than resolving them. Hence, inspections provide feedback and don't directly modify the work-product.

Exam Tips - Answering Questions on Inspections:
1. Remember the concept and purpose of inspections in FDD, along with its key benefits. This will assist with questions related to the role and significance of inspections.
2. Understanding the inspection process and its participants will aid in answering application-based exam questions, like 'Who performs an inspection?' or 'How is an inspection conducted?'.
3. Keep in mind that inspections are a preventive technique and focus on early detection of issues. This will be helpful for comparisons or in case-scenario questions.
4. Knowing the timing and frequency of inspections in the FDD process can help answer questions related to process timelines and scheduling.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

Question 1

During an inspection, you realize that a team member misunderstood the project requirements and developed the feature incorrectly. What is the best approach to address this?

Escalate the issue to upper management. Blame the team member in front of the entire team. Discuss the issue with the team member and revise the work, integrating it in the next sprint. Demand the team member to fix the issue immediately, even if it means working overtime. Remove the team member from the team. Let the incorrect feature stay in the project.

Correct Answer: Discuss the issue with the team member and revise the work, integrating it in the next sprint.

The correct approach is discussing the issue with the team member and revising the work, integrating it in the next sprint. This solution focuses on improvement and problem-solving. Other answers are not constructive, and may create a negative environment.

Question 2

A stakeholder raises concerns about the quality of the project's output during an inspection. What should the team do?

Suggest the stakeholder attend fewer inspection meetings. Review the stakeholder's feedback and prioritize quality improvements in the backlog. Tell the stakeholder that they are wrong. Require the team members to work extra hours to improve quality immediately. Assure the stakeholder that everything will be fine. Ignore the stakeholder's concerns.

Correct Answer: Review the stakeholder's feedback and prioritize quality improvements in the backlog.

Taking stakeholder feedback into account and prioritizing quality improvements in the backlog directly addresses the concern and ensures continuous improvement. Other answers do not respect the stakeholder or fail to address the project's quality.

Question 3

In Scrum, an inspection is held at the end of each Sprint and the product increment is examined. The team realizes the work is not done as per the Definition of Done. What action should they take?

Ignore the problem if it does not persist in the next Sprint. Inspect and adapt the working strategies and update the Definition of Done, if needed. Change the team members. Continue with the same Definition of Done for the rest of the project.

Correct Answer: Inspect and adapt the working strategies and update the Definition of Done, if needed.

In Scrum, the inspect and adapt principle is at the core of the framework. Therefore, if the team realizes that the work is not done as per the Definition of Done, they should inspect the situation, understand the cause, and adapt their working strategies. This may also involve updating the Definition of Done. The other options, such as continuing with the same Definition of Done, ignoring the problem, or changing team members, do not align with the Scrum principle of inspect and adapt, and thus are not good strategies. The Scrum team should take it as a learning lesson and adjust things accordingly for improved results in coming sprints.

Go Premium