Eliminate Waste

5 minutes 5 Questions

Eliminate Waste is a concept derived from the Toyota Production System, which emphasizes on the efficient use of resources. In Lean Software Development, it focuses on identifying and removing anything that does not add value to the final product. This may include unnecessary features, redundant processes, and work that might be done in a more effective way. By reducing waste, teams can streamline their work and deliver better products to the customers in a shorter time. There are seven types of waste in software development: partially completed work, extra features, task-switching, waiting, motion, defects, and management activities.

Guide: Eliminate Waste in Lean Software Development

What is it: Eliminate Waste, a principle in Lean Software Development, is the approach of identifying and removing activities that do not add value to the software development process. The waste could be in the form of unnecessary code, process, or even time.

Why it is important: It is crucial as it helps to prioritize valuable tasks, improves efficiency and productivity, reduces costs, and helps deliver a better quality product to the client.

How it works: The identification of waste requires critical analysis of the existing process to recognize the activities that are not adding value, such as excessive documentation, waiting time, or rework. Once wastes are identified, actions are taken to eliminate or reduce them.

Answering Exam Questions on Eliminate Waste: When it comes to exam scenario, understanding Eliminate Waste is essential. Here are some tips:
1. Define Eliminate Waste in the context of Lean Software Development.
2. Elaborate its importance, why it matters.
3. Explain how to implement it in practice.
4. Consider providing examples to demonstrate your understanding.
5. Dont merely state; always provide reasoning and context to your answers.
Remember: The objective is to show your understanding of the concept and its application.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

Question 1

During the Sprint, the Agile team notices that a large amount of time is wasted on rework due to frequent changes to the scope by stakeholders. Which strategy will help in reducing this waste?

Ignore the scope changes and continue with the original plan. Allocate extra time in each Sprint for rework due to scope changes. Ask team members to work overtime to accommodate the changes. Get agreement from stakeholders to respect scope agreement for the duration of the Sprint and to add changes to a backlog for future Sprints.

Correct Answer: Get agreement from stakeholders to respect scope agreement for the duration of the Sprint and to add changes to a backlog for future Sprints.

The best strategy to handle frequent scope changes causing a waste of time in rework during the Sprint is to 'Get agreement from stakeholders to respect scope agreement for the duration of the Sprint and to add changes to a backlog for future Sprints'. This strategy is ideal in Agile methodology as it respects the principle of change adaptability but ensures it doesn't disrupt the work during a current Sprint Let us analyze why the other answers are not quite as effective: The suggestion to 'Ignore the scope changes and continue with the original plan' contradicts the Agile principle of accommodating change, and hence is not a good strategy 'Allocate extra time in each Sprint for rework due to scope changes' might sound like a plausible solution, but it is only a workaround and not a remedy. It would lead to inefficiency and dilute the process of Sprint planning Lastly, asking 'team members to work overtime to accommodate the changes' is neither sustainable nor fair. It could lead to team burnout and negative attitudes, leading to poor product quality in the long run.

Question 2

A team has just completed their Sprint, and the project manager notices the team has a surplus of materials. To eliminate waste, what should the project manager do?

Ignore the issue. Order more materials to stock up for future Sprints. Evaluate materials inventory, order materials only when needed in future Sprints. Discard excess materials. Split the surplus materials among team members. Incorporate excess materials into future projects regardless of their suitability.

Correct Answer: Evaluate materials inventory, order materials only when needed in future Sprints.

The correct answer addresses the issue of inventory waste by evaluating material usage and only ordering them when needed. The wrong answers either fail to address the problem or exacerbate it by overstocking or using unsuitable materials.

Question 3

The development team has discovered that there is a lot of duplicated code across the project, making it hard to maintain. Which course of action is the most effective in eliminating waste?

Create twice as much new original code to balance out the duplication. Refactor code by abstracting common functionality into reusable modules. Change the programming language. Discard duplicated code and start from scratch. Duplicate the code further to make it more consistent. Ignore the issue and leave the duplicated code as it is.

Correct Answer: Refactor code by abstracting common functionality into reusable modules.

Refactoring code and creating reusable modules will eliminate the waste created by code duplication. Other options either do not address the problem or make it worse.

Go Premium