Backlog Grooming

Correct Answer: The Scrum Team should factor the potential delays into their sprint planning and backlog prioritization, ensuring transparency with all stakeholders about the dependencies and possible impacts.

In Scrum, the team should always look for ways to adapt their plans and processes in light of new information or obstacles. Removing items from the backlog or ignoring potential delays does not address the root problem or help in delivering value. Escalating to management and creating separate backlogs might be actions to consider, but they do not directly involve the Scrum Team's responsibility for the sprint planning and backlog management process. The correct approach is to incorporate potential delays into planning and maintain clear communication with all stakeholders to manage expectations effectively. Creating internal alternatives could risk delivering a less valuable or viable product, which goes against the principles of Scrum.

Correct Answer: Break the story down into smaller, more manageable pieces, with a spike to investigate the unknowns followed by actionable items based on research findings.

In situations with high uncertainty, it's best to manage risk by breaking down the work into smaller chunks. Commencing with a spike allows the team to spend a time-boxed period specifically to research and understand the unknowns. This approach not only clarifies the challenge but also helps in creating actionable items for subsequent sprints. Assigning the entire sprint's capacity to the uncertain item or outsourcing it to an external team might seem tempting but doesn't leverage the iterative, incremental nature of scrum. The goal is to maintain agility and adaptability, not to commit extensive resources prematurely or sidestep the collaborative nature of the scrum team.

Correct Answer: Facilitate a discussion between the Product Owner and the Development Team to assess the risks and benefits of integrating the API, and collaborate on finding the best solution that aligns with the product goals and technical feasibility.

The most appropriate action for the Scrum Master is to facilitate a discussion between the Product Owner and the Development Team to assess the risks and benefits of integrating the third-party API. This collaborative approach allows the team to explore the potential impact on the system's performance and reliability, while also considering the importance of the user story from a product perspective. By working together, they can find the best solution that balances the product goals with technical feasibility. Advising the Product Owner to remove the story from the backlog is premature, as the concerns raised by the Development Team should be addressed through discussion and collaboration, rather than immediately dismissing the story. Instructing the Development Team to proceed with the integration without addressing their concerns goes against the principles of Scrum, which emphasize collaboration and collective decision-making. It is important to consider the team's input and ensure that technical risks are properly assessed and mitigated. While splitting the user story into smaller tasks across multiple sprints might help manage the work, it does not directly address the underlying concerns about the API's reliability and performance impact. The team should first discuss and assess these risks before deciding on the best approach to tackle the story.