Choreography vs Orchestration Patterns
Why It Is Important
Understanding choreography and orchestration patterns is essential for the AWS Developer Associate exam because these patterns fundamentally shape how you design distributed systems and microservices architectures. AWS offers various services that support both patterns, and choosing the right approach impacts scalability, coupling, maintainability, and fault tolerance of your applications.
What Are Choreography and Orchestration Patterns?
Orchestration Pattern:
In orchestration, a central coordinator (orchestrator) controls the workflow and tells each service what to do and when to do it. Think of it like a conductor leading an orchestra - one entity directs all the participants.
AWS Services for Orchestration:
• AWS Step Functions - The primary orchestration service
• Amazon SWF (Simple Workflow Service) - Legacy workflow service
Choreography Pattern:
In choreography, there is no central controller. Each service knows what to do based on events it receives and publishes its own events for others to consume. Think of it like dancers performing independently but responding to the music and each other.
AWS Services for Choreography:
• Amazon EventBridge - Event bus for routing events
• Amazon SNS - Publish/subscribe messaging
• Amazon SQS - Message queuing for decoupling
How They Work
Orchestration Workflow:
1. A central service (like Step Functions) receives a request
2. The orchestrator invokes Service A and waits for response
3. Based on the result, it invokes Service B
4. The orchestrator handles errors, retries, and state management
5. The workflow completes when all steps finish
Choreography Workflow:
1. Service A completes its task and publishes an event
2. EventBridge or SNS routes the event to interested services
3. Service B receives the event and performs its work
4. Service B publishes its own completion event
5. Other services react accordingly
Key Differences
| Aspect | Orchestration | Choreography |
| Control | Centralized | Decentralized |
| Coupling | Tighter coupling to orchestrator | Loose coupling between services |
| Visibility | Easy to visualize workflow | Harder to trace full flow |
| Scalability | Orchestrator can be bottleneck | Scales independently |
| Complexity | Simpler for complex workflows | Can become complex to manage |
When to Use Each PatternChoose Orchestration When:• You have complex, multi-step workflows
• You need centralized error handling and retry logic
• Workflow visibility and debugging are priorities
• You need to maintain strict ordering of operations
• Human approval steps are required
Choose Choreography When:• Services need to remain highly decoupled
• You want maximum scalability and flexibility
• Multiple consumers need to react to the same event
• Teams own independent services and release cycles
• The workflow is relatively simple with few dependencies
Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Choreography vs Orchestration Patterns1.
Look for keywords: If the question mentions 'central control,' 'workflow management,' or 'Step Functions,' think orchestration. If it mentions 'event-driven,' 'loosely coupled,' or 'EventBridge/SNS,' think choreography.
2.
Consider complexity: Complex workflows with multiple conditional branches and error handling typically favor Step Functions (orchestration).
3.
Evaluate coupling requirements: When questions emphasize independent deployment or team autonomy, choreography is usually the answer.
4.
Watch for saga patterns: Long-running transactions that need compensation logic often use Step Functions for orchestrated sagas or EventBridge for choreographed sagas.
5.
Remember service mappings:• Step Functions = Orchestration
• EventBridge + SNS/SQS = Choreography
6.
Visibility matters: If the question asks about monitoring, tracing, or debugging workflows, orchestration provides better built-in visibility.
7.
Single point of failure: If high availability and avoiding single points of failure are emphasized, choreography may be preferred.
8.
Hybrid approaches: Some answers may combine both patterns - using Step Functions for complex sub-workflows while using EventBridge for inter-service communication.