Back to Project Scope Management

Scope Creep

5 minutes 5 Questions

Scope Creep refers to the unexpected changes or expansion in project scope after the project has started without adjustments to time, cost, and resources. It usually happens when new features or functionalities are added to the project without proper control or review of how the changes will influence the overall project. This can be due to unclear initial requirements, lack of change control process, or lack of stakeholder engagement. If not controlled, it may result in project overruns, cost increases, and could even jeopardize the project's success.

Guide: Understanding and Managing Scope Creep

What is Scope Creep?
Scope Creep, in project management, refers to uncontrolled changes or continuous growth in a project’s scope. This can happen when the scope of a project is not appropriately defined, documented, or controlled.

Why is Scope Creep important?
It's critical to manage scope creep in any project to avoid running over budget, running overtime, and deviating from the key objectives. If uncontrolled, Scope Creep can lead to project failure.

How does Scope Creep work?
Scope Creep can occur due to numerous factors including: lack of clarity in the project requirements, absence of a change management system, underestimation of the project's complexity, or stakeholders continuously changing or adding requirements.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Scope Creep
When answering questions regarding Scope Creep in exams, follow these strategies:
- Understand the concept: You need to be completely clear about what Scope Creep is, why it happens, and its impact on any project.
- Usage of terminology: Exam questions may involve terminologies tied to Scope Creep such as 'Gold Plating', 'Feature Creep'. Be sure that you are familiar with these concepts.
- Practical scenarios: Questions may involve real-life situations or hypothetical scenarios where you would need to identify and control Scope Creep. Practice as many scenario-based questions as possible before the exam to build good understanding.
- Key prevention strategies: Note down ways to prevent Scope Creep such as good project definition, frequent client feedback and expectations' management.

Test mode:
Start practice test
CAPM - Project Scope Management Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

A project manager notices that team members are frequently adding small features to the project that were not in the original scope. What is the most effective way to address this ongoing scope creep?

Correct Answer: Implement a formal change control process

The most effective way to address ongoing scope creep is to implement a formal change control process. This approach is the best because it:

1. Establishes a structured method for managing changes to the project scope.
2. Ensures that all proposed changes are evaluated for their impact on time, cost, and resources.
3. Allows for proper documentation and approval of changes.
4. Helps maintain project focus and prevents unauthorized additions to the scope.

Implementing a change control process enables the project manager to maintain control over the project scope while still allowing for necessary adjustments.

The other options are not as effective:

Allowing the team to continue adding features as they see fit would lead to further scope creep, potentially causing budget overruns and schedule delays.

Developing a comprehensive list of potential features for future projects does not address the current issue of scope creep and may encourage more unplanned additions.

Revising the project charter to include all new features suggested by the team would legitimize scope creep rather than controlling it, potentially leading to project failure due to expanded scope and resource constraints.

Question 2

During a project review, a stakeholder proposes several new features that weren't in the original scope. These additions would enhance the product but also extend the timeline and increase costs. What's the most appropriate action for the project manager?

Correct Answer: Conduct a formal change request process, including impact analysis

The most appropriate action for the project manager in this situation is to conduct a formal change request process, including impact analysis. This approach is the best because:

1. It follows proper project management procedures.
2. It allows for a thorough evaluation of the proposed changes.
3. It considers the impact on timeline, costs, and other project constraints.
4. It provides documentation for decision-making.

Implementing the changes and adjusting the project plan accordingly is not appropriate as it bypasses the formal change control process and may lead to scope creep.

Rejecting the proposed features outright is not the best approach as it doesn't consider potential benefits to the project and may negatively impact stakeholder relationships.

Consulting with the project sponsor to approve the changes and update stakeholders is premature at this stage. Before involving the sponsor, a formal change request and impact analysis should be conducted to provide the necessary information for decision-making.

The formal change request process ensures that all aspects of the proposed changes are evaluated, including their potential impact on the project's timeline, budget, and resources. This approach allows for informed decision-making and maintains the integrity of the project management process.

Question 3

During the execution phase of a project, the project team has been consistently completing additional work that was not included in the project scope. The project manager notices that stakeholders are making frequent requests for changes and additions to the project deliverables, leading to project delays and increased costs. What is the best course of action to address this scope creep?

Correct Answer: Conduct a thorough impact analysis on all requested changes to evaluate their necessity and alignment with project objectives.

The best course of action is to conduct a thorough impact analysis on all requested changes to evaluate their necessity and alignment with project objectives. This approach allows the project manager to assess the significance and relevance of each change request before making a decision. Simply implementing the requested changes to keep stakeholders satisfied is not the right approach, as it can lead to further scope creep, delays, and increased costs without considering the project's objectives and constraints. Delegating the responsibility of evaluating the changes to the project team members may not be effective, as it is the project manager's role to oversee scope management and make informed decisions based on the project's goals and resources. Communicating to stakeholders that the project timeline and budget cannot be adjusted for any additional requirements is too rigid and may strain relationships with stakeholders. Instead, the project manager should engage stakeholders in discussions to understand their needs and find mutually beneficial solutions.

Go Premium

Certified Associate in Project Management Preparation Package (2024)

  • Earn 15 PDUs needed for your CAPM certification
  • 4454 Superior-grade Certified Associate in Project Management practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless CAPM preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Scope Creep questions
35 questions (total)
Start 35 question test