Scope Management Plan

Correct Answer: Present the change request and its impact analysis to the change control board.

In the field of project management, when there is a significant change request, the next step is to 'Present the change request and its impact analysis to the change control board.' This is the most appropriate approach considering the change control process, as it is the change control board that is responsible for making the decisions on whether to approve or reject a change request. 'Reject the change request as it would have a significant impact on the project scope.' is not an appropriate immediate step, as a significant impact in itself is not a sufficient reason to reject a change request. 'Approve the change request and inform the team to proceed with the changes.' also contradicts the change control process, as the decision to approve or reject a change request is made by the change control board, not the project manager. The option 'Ask the team to look for ways to minimize the impact of the scope change.' may be considered at a later stage if the change request is approved, but it is not the immediate next step.

Correct Answer: Hold a stakeholders meeting to discuss the identified inaccuracies and modify the scope management plan accordingly.

In the given scenario, the best course of action will be to 'Hold a stakeholders meeting to discuss the identified inaccuracies and modify the scope management plan accordingly'. This is because, as a project manager, your primary responsibility is to ensure that the project is executed according to the planned scope. If inaccuracies have been identified in the scope management plan, it is important to rectify them and make sure all stakeholders are on the same page about the changes to avoid any confusion or miscommunication in the future. Continuing with an inaccurate scope management plan would further complicate the project execution and might lead to undesired outcomes. Resigning as a project manager is not a solution as it doesn't address the problem at hand. Disciplining team members might lead to negative repercussions and would not solve the current problem.

Correct Answer: Review the project's Scope Management Plan to ensure the WBS is clearly defined.

In project management, when a worker struggles with tasks in the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), the initial response should be to revisit the project's Scope Management Plan to ensure the WBS is clearly defined. This is critical because the WBS is derived from the project scope and outlines every task that is to be performed for project completion. If it's not clearly defined, it could result in confusion and inefficiency in task execution. Hence, clarity and understanding of these tasks is crucial for each team member. As for the other answers: - Ignoring the member's concerns is not a solution, especially in large scale projects. This could propagate inefficiencies and miscommunications, causing project delays. - Asking the member to work overtime may address the short-term issue but is not a sustainable strategy. It does not address the underlying problem which may be the clarity and organization of tasks in the WBS. - Lastly, adding more team members to the project in response to confusion in task execution may not help if the WBS and its associated task delineations remain unclear.