Designing

Correct Answer: Analyze the impact and propose design modifications

The best course of action is to analyze the impact and propose design modifications. This approach is proactive and addresses the potential scalability issues early in the project lifecycle. Reasoning: 1. Early identification of issues allows for more cost-effective solutions. 2. Proposing modifications demonstrates a commitment to project success and long-term viability. 3. This approach balances the need for progress with the importance of scalability. Why other options are not ideal: - Continuing with the current design and addressing scalability issues later may lead to costly rework and potential project failure. - Completely redesigning the project from scratch is likely an overreaction and could waste time and resources. - Implementing a temporary solution and revisiting the design after project completion risks delivering a product that doesn't meet future needs and may require extensive rework. In project management, it's crucial to address potential issues as soon as they're identified, especially during the design phase when changes are less costly and disruptive.

Correct Answer: Implement a change control board to supervise changes

The best measure to handle multiple changes in client requirements during the design phase, which is causing a delay, is to 'Implement a change control board to supervise changes'. The change control board can manage, evaluate, and approve or reject changes, ensuring that only necessary changes are implemented. This helps in reducing unnecessary delays. The other options are not as effective. 'Escalating the client about the delays' doesn't directly address the issue of frequent changes. It may notify the client about the delays, but it doesn't present a solution to manage the changes. 'Asking the team to work overtime' is a short-term solution and may lead to decreased productivity and employee burnout over time. 'Terminating the project to avoid further complications' is an extreme measure that should only be considered if the project is no longer viable, not simply because the design phase is taking longer than planned due to changes in requirements.

Correct Answer: Assess alternatives that can support the necessary functions and adjust design plan accordingly.

The best course of action when designing a website and realizing halfway through that the chosen platform can't support some critical functions is to assess alternatives that can support the necessary functions and adjust the design plan accordingly. This approach adheres to good project management practices, whereby issues are proactively addressed instead of being ignored or postponed. Ignoring the issue and hoping users won't find the lack of functionality problematic is irresponsible and may lead to larger problems in the future. Similarly, continuing with the design, finishing the project, and thinking about fixing the issue in the future is a short-sighted solution that may result in wasted efforts if the platform needs to be switched. Finally, trying to convince the client they don't need those functions is unprofessional. Instead, a good project manager would address this functional issue and collaborate with the client to find a satisfying solution.