Back to Portfolio Management

Performance Evaluation

5 minutes 5 Questions

Performance evaluation in CFA Level 1 Portfolio Management involves assessing how well an investment portfolio has performed relative to its objectives and benchmarks. The primary goal is to determine whether the portfolio manager has met the investment goals while managing risk appropriately. This evaluation encompasses several key components:1. **Measurement of Returns**: Portfolio performance is often measured using metrics such as the time-weighted return (TWR) and the money-weighted return (MWR). TWR isolates the investment manager’s performance by eliminating the impact of cash flows, making it suitable for comparing against benchmarks. MWR, similar to internal rate of return (IRR), accounts for the timing and size of cash flows, reflecting the investor’s actual experience2. **Benchmarking**: Performance is typically compared against a relevant benchmark, which represents a standard or reference point. The choice of benchmark should align with the portfolio’s investment strategy and asset allocation. Comparing portfolio returns to the benchmark helps in assessing whether the manager has added value3. **Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures**: Evaluating performance solely based on returns can be misleading without considering the risk taken to achieve those returns. Common risk-adjusted measures include the Sharpe Ratio, which assesses excess return per unit of risk, and the Treynor Ratio, which evaluates returns relative to systematic risk (beta). These metrics help in understanding the efficiency of the portfolio in generating returns for the risk undertaken4. **Attribution Analysis**: This involves dissecting the portfolio’s performance to identify the sources of excess returns. It examines the impact of asset allocation, security selection, and other investment decisions. Attribution analysis helps in understanding whether outperformance or underperformance was due to strategic choices or market factors5. **Consistency and Persistence**: Assessing whether the portfolio manager consistently meets performance targets over multiple periods is crucial for evaluating long-term capabilityOverall, performance evaluation is a critical aspect of portfolio management, enabling investors to make informed decisions about their investment strategies and the effectiveness of their portfolio managers.

Performance Evaluation - A Complete Guide for CFA Level 1 Candidates

Performance evaluation is a crucial aspect of portfolio management that CFA Level 1 candidates must understand thoroughly. It involves assessing the performance of a portfolio or investment relative to a benchmark or other relevant measure.

Why is Performance Evaluation Important?
Performance evaluation is essential for several reasons:
1. It helps investors determine whether their investment strategies are effective and aligned with their goals.
2. It allows for comparisons between different portfolios or investments, aiding in decision-making.
3. It provides a basis for evaluating the skills and effectiveness of portfolio managers.

What is Performance Evaluation?
Performance evaluation is the process of measuring and analyzing the returns generated by a portfolio or investment over a specific period. It involves calculating various metrics and ratios to assess the risk-adjusted returns, such as:
1. Return measures: Absolute and relative returns, time-weighted and money-weighted returns.
2. Risk measures: Standard deviation, beta, tracking error.
3. Risk-adjusted performance measures: Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, information ratio.

How Does Performance Evaluation Work?
The performance evaluation process typically involves the following steps:
1. Determine the evaluation period: Select a relevant time frame for analysis.
2. Gather data: Collect necessary data on portfolio returns, benchmark returns, and risk-free rates.
3. Calculate performance metrics: Compute various return, risk, and risk-adjusted performance measures.
4. Compare results: Compare the portfolio's performance against the benchmark and other relevant portfolios.
5. Interpret findings: Analyze the results and draw conclusions about the portfolio's performance.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Performance Evaluation
1. Understand the formulas and concepts thoroughly, and practice calculating performance metrics.
2. Pay attention to the time period and frequency of returns mentioned in the question.
3. Be careful with the signs (+ or -) when calculating excess returns or risk premiums.
4. Remember that higher values for risk-adjusted performance measures generally indicate better performance.
5. Consider the limitations of each performance measure and interpret results in context.

By mastering the concepts and techniques of performance evaluation, CFA Level 1 candidates can effectively assess portfolio performance and make informed investment decisions.

Test mode:
Start practice test
CFA Level 1 - Portfolio Management Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In project performance evaluation, what does a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 0.85 indicate?

Correct Answer: The project is over budget

A Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 0.85 indicates that the project is over budget. The CPI is a measure of cost efficiency in a project. It is calculated by dividing the Earned Value (EV) by the Actual Cost (AC). A CPI value less than 1.0 indicates that the project is spending more money than planned for the work completed. When CPI = 0.85, it means that for every dollar spent, the project is only earning $0.85 in value. This clearly shows that the project is overspending and thus over budget. The other options are incorrect: - The project is not under budget and performing efficiently, as a CPI below 1.0 indicates inefficiency in cost management. - The project is not exactly on budget as planned. If it were, the CPI would be 1.0. - While the project might be ahead of schedule (which we cannot determine from the CPI alone), it is definitely experiencing cost overruns, not just potentially experiencing them. In project management, a CPI of 0.85 would typically trigger corrective actions to bring the project's cost performance back on track.

Question 2

The project's EVM analysis shows a positive Trend Analysis but the Variance At Completion (VAC) is negative. What does it imply and what should be your course of action?

Correct Answer: It implies that the project will end over budget if no corrective actions are taken. You should take immediate corrective measures to control cost.

A positive trend analysis in EVM implies that the project is proceeding well in terms of schedule but the negative Variance At Completion (VAC) means the project is predicted to end over budget. Even though a positive trend analysis is a good sign, the negative VAC hints at a cost overrun if no interventions are done. Therefore, immediate corrective measures are needed to control costs and ensure that the project is successfully completed within budget. The other answers are incorrect. The second option incorrectly assumes that the project is under budget which contradicts the implication of a negative VAC. The third option ignores the serious cost implications of a negative VAC, assuming that a positive trend analysis alone guarantees project success. The fourth option recommends prematurely stopping the project due to negative variance without considering possible corrective measures that could bring the project back on budget.

Question 3

When evaluating project performance using Earned Value Management (EVM), what does a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 0.85 indicate?

Correct Answer: The project is behind schedule

The Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 0.85 indicates that the project is behind schedule. Here's why:

In Earned Value Management (EVM), the SPI is calculated by dividing the Earned Value (EV) by the Planned Value (PV).

SPI = EV / PV

An SPI of 1.0 means the project is exactly on schedule.
An SPI greater than 1.0 indicates the project is ahead of schedule.
An SPI less than 1.0 indicates the project is behind schedule.

With an SPI of 0.85, which is less than 1.0, it clearly shows that the project is behind schedule. Specifically, it means the project has only completed 85% of the work that was planned to be completed by this point in time.

The other options are incorrect:

The project being 85% complete is not related to the SPI value. The SPI doesn't indicate overall project completion, but rather the efficiency of the schedule.

The project cannot be ahead of schedule with an SPI less than 1.0.

The SPI doesn't provide information about cost performance. That would be indicated by the Cost Performance Index (CPI) instead.

Go Premium

Chartered Financial Analyst Level 1 Preparation Package (2024)

  • 1094 Superior-grade Chartered Financial Analyst Level 1 practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless CFA Level 1 preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Performance Evaluation questions
34 questions (total)
Start 34 question test