Employee Compensation: Post-Employment and Share-Based

5 minutes 5 Questions

Employee compensation encompasses both post-employment benefits and share-based payments, crucial elements in financial statement analysis and the Chartered Financial Analyst Level 2 curriculum. Post-employment compensation typically refers to benefits provided to employees after they retire, such as pensions and healthcare plans. Under IAS 19 or ASC 715, these obligations require companies to estimate and record liabilities on their balance sheets based on actuarial assumptions like discount rates and expected return on plan assets. Proper accounting for post-employment benefits ensures transparency regarding a company's long-term obligations and impacts on financial health. Share-based compensation involves granting employees equity instruments, such as stock options or restricted stock units, as part of their remuneration. According to IFRS 2 or ASC 718, these transactions must be measured at fair value at the grant date and recognized as expense over the vesting period. This recognition affects both the income statement, through increased compensation expense, and the equity section of the balance sheet. In financial statement analysis, understanding these components is vital for assessing a company's true cost of employee compensation and its impact on profitability and cash flows. Post-employment obligations can signal potential future cash outflows and affect liquidity ratios. Share-based compensation, while non-cash, dilutes existing shareholders and can influence earnings per share metrics. Analysts must evaluate the assumptions and estimates underlying these compensations to gauge their sustainability and accuracy. Additionally, comparing these costs relative to revenue or employee count provides insights into a company's compensation strategy and operational efficiency. Overall, thorough analysis of post-employment and share-based compensation offers a more comprehensive view of a company's financial obligations and compensation practices, essential for making informed investment decisions.

Employee Compensation: Post-Employment and Share-Based

Employee compensation is a critical aspect of financial statement analysis, particularly in the context of post-employment benefits and share-based compensation. Understanding these concepts is essential for CFA Level 2 candidates, as they frequently appear in the exam.

Why is it important?
Post-employment benefits and share-based compensation can significantly impact a company's financial statements. These forms of compensation can affect the company's reported expenses, liabilities, and equity. Analyzing these components allows investors and analysts to better understand a company's true financial position and make informed decisions.

What is it?
Post-employment benefits are compensation arrangements provided to employees after they leave the company, such as pensions and healthcare benefits. Share-based compensation, on the other hand, refers to the practice of granting employees shares or stock options as part of their remuneration package.

How does it work?
Post-employment benefits are typically accounted for using the projected unit credit method, which estimates the present value of the future benefits earned by employees. Share-based compensation is accounted for under the fair value method, where the fair value of the equity instruments granted is recognized as an expense over the vesting period.

How to answer exam questions?
When approaching questions on employee compensation in the CFA Level 2 exam, consider the following steps:
1. Identify the type of compensation (post-employment or share-based).
2. Determine the appropriate accounting treatment based on the relevant standards (e.g., IAS 19 for post-employment benefits, IFRS 2 for share-based payments).
3. Calculate the impact on the financial statements, such as the expense recognized in the income statement or the liability recorded on the balance sheet.
4. Interpret the results in the context of the company's overall financial performance and position.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Employee Compensation
1. Familiarize yourself with the relevant accounting standards: Thoroughly study IAS 19 (Employee Benefits) and IFRS 2 (Share-based Payment) to understand the key principles and requirements.
2. Practice calculations: Work through various examples and practice problems to build your confidence in calculating the impact of post-employment benefits and share-based compensation on financial statements.
3. Pay attention to assumptions: When given information about assumptions used in calculating post-employment benefits or share-based compensation, assess their reasonableness and consider their impact on the final numbers.
4. Interpret the results: Always interpret your calculations in the context of the company's overall financial performance and position. Consider how these compensation components affect key ratios and metrics.

By understanding the importance, mechanics, and accounting treatment of employee compensation related to post-employment benefits and share-based payments, CFA Level 2 candidates can effectively navigate questions on this topic and demonstrate their expertise in financial statement analysis.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

CFA Level 2 - Financial Statement Analysis Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

Green Co. grants 1,000 share options to its CFO on January 1, 2023. The options have a grant-date fair value of $30 per option and vest after four years of service, with 25% vesting each year. The CFO leaves the company on December 31, 2024. Under IFRS 2, what is the total compensation expense Green Co. should recognize for the share-based payment?

Green Co. should recognize a total compensation expense of $15,000 for the share-based payment. Since the CFO left after two years of service, only 50% of the options vested. Therefore, the total compensation expense is $30 × 1,000 options × 50% = $15,000. Green Co. should recognize a total compensation expense of $30,000 for the share-based payment. The total fair value of the options at grant date is $30 × 1,000 options = $30,000, which should be expensed over the four-year vesting period, even though the CFO left after two years. Green Co. should recognize a total compensation expense of $7,500 for the share-based payment. Since the CFO left after two years of service, the company should expense only the portion of the options that would have vested over those two years, which is $30 × 1,000 options × 25% = $7,500.

Correct Answer: Green Co. should recognize a total compensation expense of $15,000 for the share-based payment. Since the CFO left after two years of service, only 50% of the options vested. Therefore, the total compensation expense is $30 × 1,000 options × 50% = $15,000.

The correct answer is that Green Co. should recognize a total compensation expense of $15,000 for the share-based payment. According to IFRS 2, the fair value of the equity-settled share-based payment is determined at the grant date and recognized as an expense over the vesting period. In this case, the grant date fair value is $30 per option, and there are 1,000 options granted, so the total fair value is $30,000. However, since the CFO left after two years of service, only 50% of the options had vested at that point. Therefore, Green Co. should recognize only the portion of the expense that corresponds to the vested options. The calculation is as follows: Total fair value at grant date: $30 × 1,000 options = $30,000 Portion of options vested: 50% (2 out of 4 years) Compensation expense to be recognized: $30,000 × 50% = $15,000 The other answers are incorrect because they either recognize the full expense regardless of the CFO's departure or incorrectly calculate the vested portion of the options.

Question 2

Under US GAAP, which of the following statements about the accounting for share-based compensation is correct?

The intrinsic value of share-based compensation is determined at the vesting date and recognized as an expense in the period when the shares vest. The fair value of share-based compensation is estimated at the grant date, but the expense is only recognized when the shares are exercised by the employee. The fair value of share-based compensation is determined at the grant date and recognized as an expense over the required service period.

Correct Answer: The fair value of share-based compensation is determined at the grant date and recognized as an expense over the required service period.

The correct answer is that the fair value of share-based compensation is determined at the grant date and recognized as an expense over the required service period. Under US GAAP (ASC 718), share-based compensation should be measured at fair value on the grant date. The fair value is then recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, which is usually the vesting period, using the straight-line method unless another method better reflects the pattern of services received. The other options are incorrect because: - The intrinsic value method is not used under US GAAP for share-based compensation. Fair value is the required measurement method. - The expense is recognized over the service period, not only when the shares are exercised by the employee.

Question 3

Under IFRS 2, which of the following is the appropriate accounting treatment for share-based compensation with a market condition?

The fair value of the share-based payment is determined at the grant date and is subsequently adjusted based on the probability of satisfying the market condition. The fair value of the share-based payment is determined at the vesting date, taking into account whether the market condition has been satisfied. The fair value of the share-based payment is determined at the grant date and is not subsequently adjusted, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied.

Correct Answer: The fair value of the share-based payment is determined at the grant date and is not subsequently adjusted, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied.

The correct answer is that the fair value of the share-based payment is determined at the grant date and is not subsequently adjusted, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied. Under IFRS 2, when a share-based payment has a market condition, the fair value is measured at the grant date, taking into account the probability of satisfying the market condition. This fair value is not subsequently adjusted, even if the market condition is not met. The other answers are incorrect because: - The fair value should not be subsequently adjusted based on the probability of satisfying the market condition. The probability is already factored in at the grant date. - The fair value is determined at the grant date, not the vesting date, and it does not take into account whether the market condition has been satisfied at the vesting date.

Go Premium

Chartered Financial Analyst Level 2 Preparation Package (2024)

1061 Superior-grade Chartered Financial Analyst Level 2 practice questions.
Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
Unlock Effortless CFA Level 2 preparation: 5 full exams.
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!

Start Your Free 7-Day Trial

More Employee Compensation: Post-Employment and Share-Based questions

24 questions (total)

Start 24 question test