Phase 2: Where Are We Now?
Phase 2: Where Are We Now? is a critical assessment phase in COBIT 2019 implementation that focuses on establishing the current state of an organization's governance and management practices. This phase involves conducting a comprehensive baseline assessment to understand the existing maturity leve… Phase 2: Where Are We Now? is a critical assessment phase in COBIT 2019 implementation that focuses on establishing the current state of an organization's governance and management practices. This phase involves conducting a comprehensive baseline assessment to understand the existing maturity levels across all relevant COBIT processes and enablers. During this phase, organizations perform detailed evaluations using various assessment methods such as interviews, questionnaires, observations, and document reviews. The primary objective is to identify the current capabilities, processes, and tools in place, as well as any gaps between the desired state and the actual state of governance and management. Key activities in this phase include: 1. Data Collection: Gathering information about existing processes, controls, and practices across the organization through multiple assessment techniques. 2. Process Evaluation: Analyzing how well current processes align with COBIT framework domains including Governance and Management enablers. 3. Capability Assessment: Determining the maturity level of each process using the COBIT maturity model, typically ranging from Incomplete to Optimized. 4. Gap Analysis: Identifying discrepancies between current state and target state to understand improvement areas. 5. Stakeholder Engagement: Involving key personnel from various departments to ensure comprehensive understanding of organizational practices. 6. Documentation: Recording findings in assessment reports that serve as the foundation for future improvements. This phase is essential because it provides the baseline necessary for measuring progress and demonstrating the value of COBIT implementation. The insights gained help prioritize improvement initiatives and allocate resources effectively. Understanding the current state enables organizations to create realistic roadmaps and establish achievable targets for their governance maturation journey.
COBIT 2019 Foundation: Phase 2 - Where Are We Now? - Complete Guide
COBIT 2019 Foundation: Phase 2 - Where Are We Now?
1. Why Is Phase 2 Important?
Phase 2: Where Are We Now? is a critical stage in the COBIT implementation journey because it establishes the baseline of your organization's current governance and management capabilities. Understanding your starting point is essential for several reasons:
- Foundation for Improvement: You cannot effectively plan improvements without understanding where you currently stand. This phase identifies existing strengths and weaknesses.
- Risk Identification: It reveals gaps in governance and management practices that may pose risks to the organization.
- Resource Planning: Understanding the current state helps allocate resources efficiently for improvement initiatives.
- Stakeholder Alignment: It provides a common understanding among stakeholders about the organization's governance maturity.
- Baseline for Measurement: It establishes metrics against which future progress can be measured and monitored.
2. What Is Phase 2: Where Are We Now?
Phase 2 is the assessment phase of the COBIT implementation roadmap. It involves evaluating the organization's current state across governance and management processes to understand:
- The maturity level of existing processes
- How well current practices align with COBIT principles
- Gaps between current state and desired state
- Organizational capabilities and constraints
Key Components of Phase 2:
- Current State Assessment: Evaluating existing governance structures, processes, and practices
- Capability Assessment: Measuring the maturity and effectiveness of IT governance and management processes
- Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding roles, responsibilities, and concerns of key stakeholders
- Risk and Compliance Review: Identifying current compliance gaps and risk exposures
- Resource Inventory: Assessing available skills, tools, and infrastructure
3. How Phase 2 Works
Phase 2 operates through a structured assessment process:
Step 1: Define Assessment Scope
Determine which processes, domains, and organizational units will be assessed. This involves:
- Identifying critical business processes that depend on IT
- Selecting specific COBIT processes to evaluate
- Determining assessment boundaries and depth
- Defining the organizational scope (enterprise-wide, specific units, or functions)
Step 2: Gather Information
Collect data about current governance and management practices through:
- Interviews: Conduct one-on-one or group interviews with process owners, managers, and staff
- Surveys: Distribute questionnaires to stakeholders
- Document Reviews: Analyze existing policies, procedures, and documentation
- Observations: Observe actual process execution
- Workshops: Facilitate group discussions to gather insights
Step 3: Analyze Current Processes
Evaluate how processes currently function:
- Document existing process workflows
- Identify who performs specific activities
- Understand decision-making mechanisms
- Review control mechanisms and monitoring practices
Step 4: Assess Maturity Levels
Evaluate each process against COBIT's capability maturity model. COBIT uses a maturity scale typically ranging from:
- Level 0 (Incomplete): Process is not performed or partially performed
- Level 1 (Performed): Process is executed informally
- Level 2 (Managed): Process is documented and executed with basic management
- Level 3 (Defined): Process is documented, communicated, and formalized
- Level 4 (Quantitatively Managed): Process is managed with quantitative objectives and metrics
- Level 5 (Optimized): Process is continuously improved and optimized
Step 5: Identify Gaps
Compare current state against desired future state to identify:
- Process gaps (missing processes or incomplete processes)
- Capability gaps (insufficient maturity levels)
- Resource gaps (insufficient skills, tools, or staffing)
- Knowledge gaps (lack of awareness or understanding)
Step 6: Document Findings
Create a comprehensive assessment report that includes:
- Current state baseline across all assessed processes
- Maturity levels for each process
- Identified gaps and deficiencies
- Risk implications of current gaps
- Stakeholder observations and feedback
4. Key Elements to Understand for Phase 2
Baseline Establishment: Phase 2 creates a measurable baseline that serves as the reference point for all future improvements. This baseline includes both qualitative descriptions and quantitative metrics.
As-Is State Documentation: Comprehensive documentation of how things currently operate, including process flows, responsibilities, tools, and technologies.
Gap Analysis: The difference between the current state (as-is) and the desired future state (to-be) identifies improvement opportunities and priorities.
Capability Assessment: Understanding not just what processes exist, but how effectively and maturely they are executed.
Stakeholder Engagement: Involving key stakeholders ensures accurate assessment and builds support for future improvements.
5. Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Phase 2: Where Are We Now?
Tip 1: Understand the Purpose Clearly
Remember that Phase 2 is fundamentally about assessment and establishing a baseline. Exam questions often test whether you understand that this is not about implementing changes yet, but about understanding the starting point. The key purpose is to:
- Establish the current state of governance and management
- Identify gaps between current and desired states
- Provide a foundation for planning improvements
Exam Tip: If a question asks what Phase 2 achieves first, the answer typically involves assessment, baseline establishment, or understanding the current state rather than implementing improvements.
Tip 2: Recognize Key Activities
Be familiar with the main activities conducted during Phase 2:
- Stakeholder interviews
- Process documentation review
- Capability assessment
- Gap analysis
- Risk identification
Exam Tip: Questions may ask which activity would be performed in Phase 2. Look for answers related to assessment, evaluation, and baseline establishment rather than implementation or change activities.
Tip 3: Know the Maturity Model
Be comfortable with COBIT's maturity levels (0-5) and be able to:
- Define each level accurately
- Understand what characteristics define each level
- Identify the differences between levels
- Understand that higher maturity equals better capability
Exam Tip: Exam questions often present scenarios and ask you to identify the maturity level. Focus on keywords like "informal," "documented," "quantified," and "optimized" which correspond to specific levels.
Tip 4: Distinguish Between Assessment Types
Understand different assessment approaches:
- Formal Assessment: Structured, comprehensive evaluation against COBIT standards
- Self-Assessment: Organization evaluates itself using internal resources
- Third-Party Assessment: External experts conduct the assessment
Exam Tip: When questions ask about assessment methods or approaches, consider the scope, resources, expertise required, and stakeholder acceptance implications.
Tip 5: Focus on Gap Analysis Outcomes
Understand what gap analysis reveals:
- Process Gaps: Missing or incomplete processes
- Maturity Gaps: Current maturity below target maturity
- Resource Gaps: Insufficient people, tools, or technology
- Knowledge Gaps: Lack of awareness or skills
Exam Tip: Questions may describe a gap and ask you to categorize it or suggest how to address it. Clearly understanding gap types helps you answer correctly.
Tip 6: Connect Phase 2 to Other Phases
Understand how Phase 2 relates to other implementation phases:
- Phase 1 (What Do We Want to Achieve): Defines the target state; Phase 2 compares to this target
- Phase 3 (What Do We Need to Do): Uses Phase 2 findings to create improvement roadmap
- Phase 4 (How Do We Get There): Uses Phase 3 roadmap to execute improvements
- Phase 5 (Did We Get There): Measures progress against Phase 2 baseline
Exam Tip: When answering questions about Phase 2's role in the broader implementation journey, emphasize that it provides essential input to subsequent phases by establishing the baseline and identifying gaps.
Tip 7: Recognize Stakeholder Importance
Understand that Phase 2 requires significant stakeholder involvement:
- IT management and staff
- Business process owners
- Risk and compliance officers
- C-level executives
- External advisors (if applicable)
Exam Tip: Questions may ask which stakeholders should be involved in assessments. Remember that Phase 2 requires broad participation to ensure accurate assessment and organizational buy-in.
Tip 8: Identify Common Phase 2 Outcomes
Know what deliverables Phase 2 produces:
- Current state assessment report
- Maturity level ratings for each process
- Gap analysis findings
- Risk assessment based on current gaps
- Prioritized list of improvement opportunities
- Baseline metrics for future monitoring
Exam Tip: When questions ask what Phase 2 delivers, look for answers related to assessment reports, baselines, gap analyses, and prioritized improvement opportunities.
Tip 9: Understand Challenges and Considerations
Be aware of challenges in Phase 2:
- Data Collection: Getting accurate information from busy stakeholders
- Resistance: People may not want to admit current deficiencies
- Scope Creep: Assessment can expand beyond defined boundaries
- Resource Constraints: Limited time and expertise for assessment
- Political Sensitivity: Findings may reflect poorly on some departments or leaders
Exam Tip: Scenario-based questions may present challenges. Think about how to address them in Phase 2—often the answer involves stakeholder communication, clear scope definition, and ensuring management support.
Tip 10: Practice Scenario Analysis
For scenario-based questions about Phase 2:
- Identify what information is available (assessment data)
- Determine what conclusions can be drawn from the scenario
- Recognize what Phase 2 activities or outputs the scenario describes
- Consider stakeholder perspectives and concerns
- Think about next steps (usually Phase 3 planning)
Exam Tip: Read scenario questions carefully. They often ask you to identify:
- What phase is being described (ensure it's Phase 2)
- What activity is occurring
- What the appropriate next step would be
- What the significance of findings is
Tip 11: Remember the "As-Is" vs "To-Be" Distinction
Phase 2 is about understanding the As-Is (current state):
- As-Is: How processes currently function (Phase 2 focus)
- To-Be: How processes should function (defined in Phase 1, addressed in Phases 3-4)
Exam Tip: If a question describes activities focused on understanding current processes, workflows, and capabilities, it's likely describing Phase 2 activities.
Tip 12: Study Real-World Contexts
Understand how Phase 2 applies across different scenarios:
- Organizations starting from scratch (minimal processes)
- Organizations with existing governance (assessing current maturity)
- Organizations post-acquisition (integrating different governance models)
- Organizations responding to regulatory changes (reassessing against new requirements)
Exam Tip: Context matters. A Phase 2 assessment in a newly formed company looks different from one in a mature enterprise. Tailor your answers to the scenario presented.
6. Common Exam Question Patterns for Phase 2
Pattern 1: "What is the primary objective of Phase 2?"
Answer: To establish the current state baseline and identify gaps between current and desired capabilities.
Pattern 2: "Which activity belongs to Phase 2?"
Look for assessment, evaluation, stakeholder interviews, document review, and capability assessment.
Pattern 3: "A process operates informally without documentation. What is its maturity level?"
Answer: Level 1 (Performed) or Level 0 depending on consistency.
Pattern 4: "What should happen after Phase 2 assessment is complete?"
Answer: Gap analysis findings inform the planning of improvements in Phase 3.
Pattern 5: "Who should participate in Phase 2 assessments?"
Answer: Process owners, IT management, business stakeholders, and sometimes external assessors.
7. Key Takeaways for Exam Success
- Phase 2 is about assessment and baseline establishment
- It creates an as-is view of current governance and management capabilities
- It produces gap analysis comparing current to desired states
- Understanding maturity levels is essential for capability assessment
- Phase 2 requires significant stakeholder engagement and data collection
- Phase 2 outcomes directly inform Phase 3 roadmap planning
- The assessment should be comprehensive yet focused within defined scope
- Challenges in Phase 2 often relate to data accuracy, stakeholder resistance, and scope management
- Always connect Phase 2 findings to the broader implementation journey
- Practice analyzing scenarios to identify Phase 2 activities and appropriate conclusions
🎓 Unlock Premium Access
COBIT 2019 Foundation + ALL Certifications
- 🎓 Access to ALL Certifications: Study for any certification on our platform with one subscription
- 3680 Superior-grade COBIT 2019 Foundation practice questions
- Unlimited practice tests across all certifications
- Detailed explanations for every question
- COBIT Foundation: 5 full exams plus all other certification exams
- 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund if unsatisfied
- Risk-Free: 7-day free trial with all premium features!