Dot Voting

5 minutes 5 Questions

Dot Voting is a simple technique. Every team member gets a set number of 'dots' or votes that they can use to vote on user stories. Stories getting maximum votes are considered to have the highest priority or complexity. This method allows every individual of the team to participate actively and pr…

Comprehensive Guide on Dot Voting

What is Dot Voting:
Dot voting, also known as dotmocracy or multi-voting, is a simple way for a group to prioritize or make decisions from a list of options. Participants express their preferences by placing dot stickers or marks–the 'votes'–next to a choice of options.

Why is it Important:
It’s a quick and easy method for prioritizing a large number of ideas, assists in decision making in group processes, ensuring that all voices are heard. Delegates the power to decide from an individual to a group, providing a democratic way of sorting choices.

How it Works:
First, ideas are generated and each one is written on a blackboard or sticky notes. Each person is then given a set number of dot stickers or marks. They vote on the ideas they find the best by affixing their dots on the options they prefer, and the idea with the most dots wins.

Guide to Answering Questions on Dot Voting in Exams:
To answer questions about dot voting in an exam, make sure you understand the concept, process and importance of dot voting. Know the steps involved in introducing, implementing, and interpreting dot voting. Remember to illustrate your answers with practical examples to showcase your understanding. Be concise, precise, and use professional language.

Exam Tips:
In an exam scenario, pay attention to the question asked. If it's about the process, detail the working of dot voting. If it's about the importance, outline how it aids decision-making in a democratic way ensuring all voices are heard. Be ready to come up with examples of scenarios where dot voting could be used. Consider how dot voting may be seen from different perspectives: a group member, a facilitator, or an auditor.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

CSM - Dot Voting Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Dot Voting

Question 1

During a dot voting session to prioritize the product backlog, you notice that one of the team members is consistently placing their dots on the same items that the Product Owner has voted for. What should you do as a Scrum Master?

Ignore the behavior and proceed with the voting session, as the Product Owner's opinion holds more weight. Have a private conversation with the team member to understand their reasoning and encourage independent thinking. Cancel the dot voting session and ask the Product Owner to prioritize the backlog items alone. Publicly call out the team member's behavior during the session and ask them to vote independently.

Correct Answer: Have a private conversation with the team member to understand their reasoning and encourage independent thinking.

As a Scrum Master, it is important to foster independent thinking and encourage team members to make their own decisions. Privately discussing the situation with the team member allows you to understand their perspective and gently encourage them to think independently, without singling them out in front of the team. Publicly calling out the behavior may embarrass the team member and harm team dynamics. Canceling the voting session or ignoring the behavior goes against the principles of collaborative decision-making and team empowerment in Scrum.

Question 2

Your team is using Dot Voting to prioritize features for the next sprints, but they are facing issues where team members are not voicing their opinions. As a Scrum Master, what tactic could you use to maximize participation?

Allow anonymous voting to encourage everyone to participate without the fear of judgement. Force members to explain their votes in front of the entire team. Cancel dot voting right away and impose your own decision. Ignore this issue as it is not serious.

Correct Answer: Allow anonymous voting to encourage everyone to participate without the fear of judgement.

The best solution to maximizing participation during Dot Voting in a Scrum Team is to allow anonymous voting. This encourages all team members to voice their opinions without the fear of judgement. Some participants may be reluctant to voice their true opinions due to fear of conflict or rejection, and anonymous voting can help to mitigate this. It provides a safe space for team members to express their input honestly and fully, fostering a sense of inclusion. Now, let's see why the other answers are not effective. Cancelling dot voting and imposing your decision does not align with the principles of Scrum, which emphasizes team decision-making and consensus. Ignoring the issue would not help in resolving it and may even worsen it in the long term. Forcing members to explain their votes publicly may disrupt the trust within the team and create unnecessary pressure, again contradicting Scrum values of respect and openness.

Question 3

During the dot voting process, it's observed that some of the team members are influencing others with their choices. How should you as a Scrum Master manage this situation?

Restructure voting process to ensure each member votes independently without seeing others' votes. Ignore the situation as it is healthy team dynamics. Ask those members not to vote anymore. Publicly reprimand those influencing others.

Correct Answer: Restructure voting process to ensure each member votes independently without seeing others' votes.

The best way to manage the situation where some team members are influencing others' choices during the dot voting process is to 'Restructure the voting process to ensure each member votes independently without seeing others' votes'. This prevents the undue influence from biasing the results and facilitates a more fair and unbiased decision-making process. Now, let's explain why the other options are not the best choices. 'Ignore the situation as it is healthy team dynamics' is not accurate as it might not promote an independent thinking and equality within the team. 'Ask those members not to vote anymore' is also not viable as it disrupts the principle of collective decision making and may lead to resentment among team members. Lastly, 'Publicly reprimand those influencing others' could create a negative atmosphere and affects team morale.

🎓 Unlock Premium Access

Certified ScrumMaster + ALL Certifications

🎓 Access to ALL Certifications: Study for any certification on our platform with one subscription
3861 Superior-grade Certified ScrumMaster practice questions
Unlimited practice tests across all certifications
Detailed explanations for every question
CSM: 5 full exams plus all other certification exams
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund if unsatisfied
Risk-Free: 7-day free trial with all premium features!

Start Your Free 7-Day Trial