Risk Ownership

Correct Answer: Rachel should step in to mitigate the immediate impact and discuss it with the risk owner as soon as possible for further handling.

The best course of action in this situation is for Rachel to step in to mitigate the immediate impact and discuss it with the risk owner as soon as possible for further handling. This is the most proactive and efficient approach as it minimizes potential negative impact on the project. Now, regarding the other options: Letting the risk situation persist until Monday could lead to compounding adverse effects on the project, it's a risky and passive response. Assigning a new risk owner immediately is not a practical solution, primarily because risk ownership might require specific expertise or knowledge about the aspect of the project at risk. That's why it's not the best option. Lastly, pausing the project until the risk owner is available could result in unnecessary down time and loss of efficiency, and it should only be considered if the risk is severe enough to potentially halt the project. Therefore, it's not a preferred solution in this scenario.

Correct Answer: Alex should provide guidance and training to the risk owners about effective risk management strategies.

In the Scrum framework, the Scrum Master is responsible for ensuring that everyone on the team understands the rules, values, and practices of Scrum. Alex, in this case, should provide guidance and training to the risk owners on effective risk management strategies. He should help clarify their roles and responsibilities and provide them with the necessary tools to manage their assigned risks effectively. Leaving the risk owners to figure out their approach or ignoring their confusion could lead to ineffective risk management and jeopardize the project. Taking back all the risk ownerships is not the right approach either, as it contradicts the very principles of Scrum that encourage team empowerment and shared ownership.

Correct Answer: Peter should quickly assign another suitable team member as the new risk owner to manage the situation.

In a Scrum framework, when a risk that was identified earlier in a project occurs, and the assigned risk owner is no longer on the project team, it is best to assign another suitable team member as the new risk owner to manage the situation. This is simply because risk management is a continuous process in project management. This approach ensures that the risk is being handled promptly and decreases any potential negative impact on the project. Ignoring the risk or blaming the out-gone risk owner would not solve the situation and could potentially make it worse. Having Peter, the Scrum Master manage the risk himself is not ideal as the Scrum Master's role is to facilitate and coach the team, not take on tasks that a team member should handle. Thus, by re-assigning the risk to another team member, the team can continue to function effectively and deal with the risk appropriately.