Focus

Correct Answer: Encourage the team to refine their definition of 'Done' to ensure it encompasses realistic expectations and capabilities.

The correct answer focuses on making sure the team's definitions and expectations are realistic and achievable, which encourages the team to work within its limits while fostering improvement. The first wrong answer introduces a concept that is plausible but shifts the focus to sprint goal redefinition rather than dealing with the capacity and capability of the team. The second wrong answer introduces a micromanagement approach, which contradicts Scrum values of trust and empowerment. The third wrong answer suggests fundamentally changing Scrum team principles by creating specialized roles, which goes against the cross-functional nature of Scrum teams.

Correct Answer: Collaborate with the Product Owner to prioritize the bug in the sprint backlog and reassess the sprint goal's feasibility.

In the context of Scrum, when a significant issue arises that could jeopardize the sprint's goals, it is essential to involve the whole team, including the Product Owner, in the decision-making process. This ensures transparency, maintains the principles of Scrum, and upholds its values such as commitment, courage, and respect. Directing a single team member to work on the issue or deciding unilaterally to focus exclusively on the bug disrupts the teamwork and self-management principles of Scrum. Similarly, deferring the problem to a future sprint retrospective may delay necessary immediate action and could result in failing to meet the sprint goal. The correct answer fosters collaboration and agile decision making, aligning with Scrum values and ensuring the team remains flexible and responsive to changes.

Correct Answer: Facilitate a team brainstorm to outline potential impacts and prepare options.

In the situation where a key component impacting project scope is overlooked and the Product Owner is unavailable, the initial action that aligns with Scrum principles is to facilitate a team brainstorm to outline potential impacts and prepare options. This approach reflects active problem-solving and maintains the team's momentum by collaboratively addressing the oversight without immediate reliance on the Product Owner. It leverages the collective expertise of the team to assess the situation, identify feasible solutions, or adjustments that can be proposed to the Product Owner upon their return. This method fosters team engagement, maintains progress, and prepares the team to present informed options to the Product Owner, facilitating a quicker resolution. The other proposed actions, such as proceeding with the original plan without addressing the oversight, halting the sprint, or shifting focus to low-priority items, do not proactively address the newly identified risk to the project's scope and may result in time wasted or missed opportunities to adapt and refine the project's direction efficiently.