Back to Scrum Values and Principles

Inspection and Adaptation

5 minutes 5 Questions

Inspection and adaptation is a core Scrum principle that revolves around frequently inspecting the project progress and adapting the process as required. Through regular reviews and retrospectives, teams can inspect their work and progress, identify bottlenecks or problems, and make necessary changes to improve. It's a proactive approach toward tackling inefficiencies, improving team performance, and ensuring the product meets its intended goals. This principle allows the Scrum team to continuously learn, adapt and improve the product and process, leading to the delivery of a product that is the best possible fit for the customer's needs.

Guide on Inspection and Adaptation in Scrum Principles

What it is:
Inspection and adaptation is a fundamental concept in Scrum, functioning as a process to consistently improve and add value to a product. Inspection pertains to constantly checking the work progress and product outcome, considering every aspect, i.e., its functionality, practicality, efficiency, and user satisfaction. Adaptation, on the other hand, refers to the modification of strategies or techniques based on the findings from the inspection stage.

Why it is important:
Inspection and adaptation allow the Scrum team to tailor tasks and objectives in line with the project’s goal and stakeholders' needs. Through constant examination, the team can spot any discrepancies or problems in the early stages and find suitable solutions through adaptation. This method helps to minimize waste, improve efficiency, and ensure the delivered product aligns with clients' expectations.

How it works:
Throughout the Scrum process, the team regularly performs an inspection of the product and the work progress, often during sprint reviews and daily stand-ups. They then adapt, which means changing any inefficient or ineffective processes, techniques or approaches to enhance efficiency and value. This cycle repeats until the end of the project.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Inspection and Adaptation:
Understanding the importance and workings of inspection and adaptation will help you to handle related exam questions effectively. Remember to always link the role of inspection and adaptation to value addition and enhancement of product quality. Also, emphasis on both parts, i.e., inspecting continuously and adapting based on inspections, is key. Don't sway towards one or the other; both are equally important and relate to the main goal which is constant improvement. Questions can be scenario-based, so always consider the context and interpret how effective inspection and adaptation can solve any highlighted issue.

Test mode:
Start practice test
CSM - Scrum Values and Principles Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

A Scrum Team has been consistently meeting their Sprint Goals and delivering high-quality increments. However, during the Sprint Retrospective, they realize that their processes have become stagnant and they are not actively seeking improvements. What should the Scrum Master encourage the team to do?

Correct Answer: Conduct experiments to introduce small changes and evaluate their impact on the team's performance and effectiveness.

The best answer is to conduct experiments to introduce small changes and evaluate their impact on the team's performance and effectiveness. This approach aligns with the Scrum principle of continuous improvement and the Scrum value of courage. By encouraging the team to experiment and iterate, the Scrum Master is fostering a culture of learning and adaptation. Small changes allow the team to assess the impact of each change and make informed decisions about whether to adopt or discard the changes. Continuing with the current processes, even though the team is performing well, goes against the Scrum principle of continuous improvement. Scrum Teams should always strive to find ways to improve and optimize their processes. Completely overhauling processes and adopting a new approach is a drastic measure that may disrupt the team's current success. It's better to introduce changes incrementally and evaluate their impact before making significant changes. Focusing solely on increasing velocity and delivering more features may lead to compromising quality and sustainability. The primary goal should be to deliver value and improve the team's effectiveness, not just to demonstrate improvement to stakeholders.

Question 2

The product owner wants to add some items to the current sprint backlog that the team determines are not feasible within the sprint. As Scrum Master, what should be your approach?

Correct Answer: Inform the Product Owner that the sprint backlog is usually not increased mid-sprint and recommend discussing these items in Sprint Planning for the next sprint.

The most appropriate action for a Scrum Master when a Product Owner wants to include items mid-sprint in the backlog that the team deems infeasible is to 'Inform the Product Owner that the sprint backlog is usually not increased mid-sprint and recommend discussing these items in Sprint Planning for the next sprint'. This respects the team's boundaries and capacity, and honors the set structure of Agile methodology. The other alternatives disregard team feedback and Agile principles. Asking the team to work overtime or forcing them to add new items mid-sprint, undermines the team's autonomy and sacrifices sustainable development. Similarly, telling the Product Owner to add items to the backlog without a team consensus completely bypasses the team's input, which is crucial in Agile practices.

Question 3

Scrum Master noticed that the team were not meeting their Sprint goals consistently. What is the first step to rectify this issue?

Correct Answer: Inspect the issue with the team during the Sprint Retrospective, identifying any blocks or issues hindering their delivery.

The best approach when a Scrum team is consistently failing to meet their Sprint goals is to first inspect the issue as a team during the Sprint Retrospective. During a Sprint Retrospective, the team togetherly reviews the work completed and the challenges encountered over the Sprint. This inspection allows the team to identify any blocks or issues hindering their delivery, which can then be addressed to ensure better performance in upcoming sprints. Now, for the wrong answers: 'Increasing the workload in the following Sprint' will not address the root cause of the issue and is likely to make the problem worse by putting more pressure on the team. 'Punishing the team for not meeting their goals' is against the principles of Scrum, which emphasizes learning and collaboration over blame and punishment. Lastly, 'Ignoring the problem hoping it will solve itself' is not proactive and does not align with Scrum's principle of regular inspection and adaptation.

Go Premium

Certified ScrumMaster Preparation Package (2024)

  • 3861 Superior-grade Certified ScrumMaster practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless CSM preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Inspection and Adaptation questions
7 questions (total)
Start 7 question test