Scrum vs Kanban Workflow

Correct Answer: Kanban

In a situation where work items change frequently and priorities shift, Kanban would be the logical choice. Kanban is a workflow management method designed to help visualize work, limit work-in-progress, and maximize operational efficiency. It is extremely flexible and allows real-time communication of capacity and full transparency of work. As tasks are constantly being reprioritized, the main goal is to have ongoing tasks be delivered continuously and as rapidly as possible, which is possible with Kanban's processes. Scrum, on the other hand, operates in iterations, called Sprints, that typically last 2-4 weeks. Changes are not welcomed once the iteration has started, and the team is committed to deliver specifically agreed upon work items at the end of each Sprint. This does not lend itself well to an environment where tasks and priorities can change daily. Applying both Scrum and Kanban to this situation would be a hybrid of two systems which may not be effective, as it would lack the discipline of Scrum and the flexibility of Kanban. Option 'Neither Scrum nor Kanban' is incorrect because Kanban is much better suited to a changing workflow. It's a simple, flexible, and effective method that is specifically designed to adapt to changing priorities in real-time.

Correct Answer: Kanban, as it better accommodates continuous changes in real-time.

Among Scrum and Kanban, Kanban would handle the need for continuous feedback and real-time changes better. In a project development scenario that requires continuous feedback and real-time changes, Kanban is generally the more suitable Agile methodology. This is because Kanban is designed to manage work in progress and can readily accommodate changes or new tasks in real-time, as they emerge. On the other hand, the Scrum framework is more structured and works in fixed-length iterations, called 'sprints', these iterations are typically 1-4 week long. While Scrum allows for adaptive planning, changes are generally not made in the middle of a sprint. For this reason, Scrum may not handle real-time changes as well as Kanban Therefore, the alternative responses stating that 'Scrum, as it is structured around sprints which allow for feedback at the end of each one' and 'Scrum, as it has very strict deadlines and can handle real-time changes better' are incorrect, as they do not take into account the real-time flexibility of Kanban, especially in the context of a flow of work that is continuously changing The option that suggests 'Kanban, as it is very strict and doesn't allow for continuous changes' is incorrect as this incorrectly characterizes the nature of Kanban. In fact, the flexibility and fluidity of Kanban boards is what allows for real-time adaptation to changes.

Correct Answer: Kanban, as it is not restrained by fixed iterations and allows to work on a feature until it's done.

In a situation where feature completion is prioritized over releasing on schedule, the best method is Kanban. Unlike Scrum, Kanban is not constrained by fixed iterations. This means that teams can focus entirely on a feature and work on it until it is done. Even though Scrum puts an emphasis on complete features in a time-boxed manner, it sometimes may not be practical if feature completion is more vital as it enforces the time frame to release regularly. On the other hand, the last answer stating that neither Scrum nor Kanban prioritize feature completion over releasing on schedule is incorrect because Kanban allows more flexibility for continual improvement and is more adaptable to change, which suits situations where feature completion is more crucial.