Back to Agile and Lean for Teams

Iterative and Incremental Development

5 minutes 5 Questions

Iterative and Incremental Development is a core principle of Agile methodologies, emphasizing the delivery of work in small, manageable segments. Instead of attempting to deliver a complete solution in one large effort, teams break down projects into smaller iterations, each adding functionality or value to the overall product. This approach allows teams to respond to change effectively, incorporating feedback from stakeholders after each iteration. In practice, an iteration could be a short time frame, such as two to four weeks, during which a team works on a set of features or tasks. At the end of each iteration, the team produces a potentially shippable product increment. This not only ensures continuous delivery of value but also enables teams to learn and adapt based on actual results and stakeholder input. The incremental nature means that each iteration builds upon the previous one, gradually enhancing the product. This approach reduces risks associated with long-term planning and assumptions, as it allows for regular reassessment and adaptation. It fosters transparency and keeps stakeholders engaged throughout the development process, as they can see tangible progress at regular intervals. Iterative and Incremental Development promotes flexibility, encourages early detection of issues, and supports continuous improvement. By regularly reflecting on the work completed and the methods used, teams can make adjustments to improve both the product and the process. This concept is fundamental to Agile and Lean practices, aligning with the goal of delivering maximum value to the customer efficiently and effectively.

Test mode:
Start practice test
DASM - Agile and Lean for Teams Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In an iterative and incremental development context, what is the best way to handle technical debt during the project?

Correct Answer: Allocate time in each iteration to address technical debt while delivering new features

The best practice in iterative and incremental development is to balance new feature development with technical debt management throughout the project lifecycle. By allocating time in each iteration to address technical debt while delivering new features, teams can: - Maintain a sustainable development pace - Prevent technical debt from accumulating to unmanageable levels - Keep the codebase healthy and maintainable - Reduce the risk of major refactoring needs later Other approaches are problematic because: - Postponing technical debt until final phases creates significant risks and can make the system harder to maintain and modify - Waiting until performance is affected means the debt has already become a serious problem - Creating separate iterations for technical debt can disrupt the flow of value delivery and may lead to extended periods of no new features Regular, consistent attention to technical debt as part of the normal development cycle is the most effective approach in agile methodologies.

Question 2

During incremental development, what is the most effective method for validating architectural decisions?

Correct Answer: Building the system in small steps and testing core functionalities early

Building the system in small steps and testing core functionalities early is the most effective method for validating architectural decisions during incremental development because: - It allows early detection of potential architectural issues - Provides rapid feedback on design decisions - Enables adjustments before significant resources are invested - Aligns with agile principles of iterative development - Reduces risk by validating assumptions quickly The other approaches are less effective because: Extensive documentation upfront can become outdated quickly and may not reflect real-world implementation challenges. Building all core components simultaneously increases risk and complexity, making it harder to isolate and address architectural issues. Implementing complete architecture upfront is contrary to agile principles and creates high risk of rework if architectural assumptions prove incorrect.

Question 3

During sprint planning in an iterative development process, when should the team integrate feedback from stakeholders?

Correct Answer: At the start of each new iteration to refine upcoming features

In Disciplined Agile Scrum and iterative development, stakeholder feedback should be integrated at the start of each new iteration to refine upcoming features. This approach allows for: - Continuous improvement based on real feedback - Early course correction if needed - Better alignment with stakeholder needs - Reduced risk of building unwanted features - More efficient resource utilization The other options are incorrect because: Waiting until project end to receive feedback defeats the purpose of iterative development and risks significant rework. Limiting feedback to only major architectural changes misses opportunities for smaller, valuable improvements. Waiting for technical limitations to arise is reactive rather than proactive, and could lead to missed opportunities for optimization and improvement.

Go Premium

Disciplined Agile Scrum Master Preparation Package (2024)

  • 2040 Superior-grade Disciplined Agile Scrum Master practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless DASM preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Iterative and Incremental Development questions
16 questions (total)
Start 16 question test