Ensuring Alignment of Process Goals Across the Enterprise

Correct Answer: At regular intervals based on organizational change patterns

In Disciplined Agile, process goals should be reviewed and realigned at regular intervals based on organizational change patterns. This is the optimal approach because: Regular intervals allow organizations to: - Maintain alignment with evolving business objectives - Respond to market changes systematically - Ensure continuous improvement of processes - Adapt to emerging patterns and needs The other options are less effective because: - Waiting for major restructuring is too infrequent and reactive - Reviewing after each sprint is too frequent and could create unnecessary overhead at the enterprise level - Monthly reviews on a fixed schedule may not align with the organization's natural change cycles and could be either too frequent or too infrequent depending on the context

Correct Answer: The Enterprise Coach

The Enterprise Coach is the correct answer as this role has the specific responsibility of ensuring process goal alignment across teams in a Disciplined Agile enterprise environment. The Enterprise Coach works at an organizational level and has the expertise to guide multiple teams toward consistent process goals while respecting their autonomy. The Portfolio Management Team focuses on strategic project selection and resource allocation rather than process alignment. The Agile Center of Excellence Leadership Council typically focuses on standards and best practices but does not actively ensure cross-team process alignment. Team Level Scrum Masters primarily focus on their individual teams' processes and do not have the enterprise-wide scope needed for ensuring cross-team process goal alignment.

Correct Answer: Establishing common measurement criteria and regular alignment workshops

Establishing common measurement criteria and regular alignment workshops is the best approach because: DA emphasizes context-sensitive solutions and adaptive practices while maintaining enterprise-wide coherence. Common measurements and alignment workshops allow teams to: - Share experiences and best practices - Maintain autonomy while ensuring strategic alignment - Adapt processes to their specific contexts while working toward common goals - Foster collaborative improvement and learning The other options are incorrect because: Standardized tools and uniform practices contradict DA's principle of context-sensitivity and team empowerment. Detailed process documentation and strict adherence guidelines limit adaptability and innovation, opposing DA's flexible approach. Enforcing uniform sprint lengths and synchronized releases fails to account for different team contexts and needs, contradicting DA's pragmatic approach to process tailoring.