Sponsor Role in Disciplined Agile

Correct Answer: Ensures the team has access to required resources and funding

The Sponsor role in Disciplined Agile has the key responsibility of ensuring the team has access to required resources and funding. This is correct because: - The Sponsor acts as an organizational champion - They remove organizational impediments - They secure necessary funding and resources - They provide high-level guidance and support The other options are incorrect because: - Maintaining technical documentation and code reviews are typically responsibilities of technical team members or architects - Creating sprint backlogs and managing daily stand-ups are responsibilities of the Team Lead/Scrum Master role - Writing user stories and serving as primary stakeholder contact are typically Product Owner responsibilities

Correct Answer: Provides guidance on business value prioritization and removes organizational impediments

In Disciplined Agile (DA), the Sponsor's primary role is to provide strategic guidance focused on business value and remove organizational impediments that might affect the team's progress. The correct answer reflects the true strategic nature of the Sponsor role in DA, where they focus on value delivery and organizational support, while letting the team maintain their autonomy in day-to-day operations. The other options are incorrect because: - Managing daily team activities and participating in technical planning sessions is not appropriate for a Sponsor role - this micromanagement would undermine team autonomy - Reviewing and approving each sprint backlog item would be too tactical for a Sponsor and would slow down the team's progress - Focusing only on resource allocation and metrics is too narrow and misses the key strategic aspects of the Sponsor role in providing value guidance

Correct Answer: They attend only when specifically invited to discuss organizational impediments

In Disciplined Agile, retrospectives are team-focused events where members can speak openly about their experiences and challenges. The Sponsor's involvement is purposefully limited and only occurs when there are specific organizational impediments that require their attention or authority to resolve. The correct answer reflects the ideal Disciplined Agile approach where Sponsors maintain appropriate boundaries and respect team autonomy, only joining when their presence adds value for addressing specific organizational challenges. Other options are incorrect because: - Regular Sponsor participation in all retrospectives would inhibit open discussion and potentially make team members feel monitored or controlled - Quarterly attendance would impose an artificial schedule that doesn't align with when actual organizational impediments arise - Sending a representative creates an unnecessary reporting layer and could make the retrospective feel like a status meeting rather than a team improvement opportunity