Back to Program Stakeholder Engagement

Classification Models for Stakeholder Analysis

5 minutes 5 Questions

In Program Management Professional (PgMP) practices, effective stakeholder engagement is crucial for program success. Classification models for stakeholder analysis provide a structured approach to identify, categorize, and prioritize stakeholders based on various attributes. One widely used model is the Power-Interest Grid, which segments stakeholders into four categories: high power/high interest, high power/low interest, low power/high interest, and low power/low interest. This helps program managers tailor their communication and engagement strategies accordingly. Another model is the Salience Model, which classifies stakeholders based on their power, legitimacy, and urgency. This triad allows managers to determine which stakeholders require immediate attention and resources. Additionally, the Stakeholder Influence Diagram maps out the relationships and influence levels among stakeholders, highlighting key players and potential allies or opponents. The Influence/Impact Matrix is another useful tool, assessing both the degree of influence a stakeholder has and the impact the program has on them, enabling prioritization of engagement efforts. These classification models facilitate a deeper understanding of stakeholder dynamics, ensuring that program managers can effectively address stakeholder needs, mitigate risks, and foster positive relationships. By systematically analyzing stakeholders through these models, program managers can allocate resources efficiently, anticipate stakeholder reactions, and enhance overall program governance. This structured approach not only improves stakeholder satisfaction but also contributes to the alignment of the program objectives with stakeholder expectations, ultimately leading to more successful program outcomes. Incorporating these classification models into stakeholder analysis empowers program managers to make informed decisions, maintain stakeholder support, and navigate the complexities of stakeholder interactions within large-scale programs.

Classification Models for Stakeholder Analysis

Stakeholder analysis is a crucial aspect of program management, and classification models play a significant role in this process. These models help program managers categorize stakeholders based on their influence, interest, and impact on the program. By understanding the importance and application of classification models, you can effectively engage stakeholders and ensure program success.

Why Classification Models are Important:
1. Prioritization: Classification models enable program managers to prioritize stakeholders based on their level of influence and interest in the program.
2. Tailored Communication: By categorizing stakeholders, program managers can develop targeted communication strategies to keep them informed and engaged.
3. Risk Mitigation: Identifying potential adversaries or resistors through classification models allows program managers to proactively address their concerns and mitigate risks.

What are Classification Models?
Classification models are frameworks used to categorize stakeholders based on specific criteria. The most common classification models include:
1. Power/Interest Grid: Categorizes stakeholders based on their level of power and interest in the program.
2. Salience Model: Classifies stakeholders based on their power, legitimacy, and urgency.
3. Influence/Impact Matrix: Categorizes stakeholders based on their level of influence and the impact they have on the program.

How Classification Models Work:
1. Identify Stakeholders: List all individuals, groups, and organizations that can affect or be affected by the program.
2. Assess Criteria: Evaluate each stakeholder based on the chosen classification model's criteria (e.g., power, interest, influence, impact).
3. Plot Stakeholders: Place stakeholders on the appropriate quadrant or section of the classification model.
4. Develop Engagement Strategies: Based on the stakeholders' positions in the model, develop tailored engagement and communication strategies.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Classification Models for Stakeholder Analysis
1. Understand the key characteristics of each classification model and how they differ from one another.
2. Practice applying classification models to various scenarios to familiarize yourself with the process.
3. When answering questions, carefully read the stakeholder descriptions and identify the most appropriate classification model based on the given criteria.
4. Consider the implications of a stakeholder's position in the classification model and how it influences the engagement strategy.
5. Remember that classification models are tools to help prioritize and engage stakeholders effectively, and the ultimate goal is to ensure program success.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PgMP - Program Stakeholder Engagement Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

As a program manager for a global software company, you are responsible for a program to develop a new cloud-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. To effectively manage stakeholder expectations and ensure program success, you decide to conduct a stakeholder analysis using the Power/Interest Grid model. After analyzing the stakeholders, you find that the Chief Information Officer (CIO) has high power and moderate interest in the program, while some key end-users have low power but high interest. What is the most appropriate approach for managing these stakeholders?

Correct Answer: Engage the CIO closely to ensure their support and keep them satisfied, while proactively consulting and involving the key end-users to incorporate their needs and concerns.

The most appropriate approach for managing these stakeholders is to engage the CIO closely to ensure their support and keep them satisfied, while proactively consulting and involving the key end-users to incorporate their needs and concerns. This is because the CIO has high power and moderate interest, meaning they can significantly influence the program's success or failure, so it's crucial to secure their support. On the other hand, the key end-users have low power but high interest, indicating that their adoption of the new system is essential for the program's success. By actively involving them and addressing their concerns, you can increase their buy-in and minimize resistance to change. The other options are less effective because they either prioritize one group of stakeholders over the other or fail to tailor the engagement approach based on the stakeholders' power and interest levels.

Question 2

As a program manager for a major construction company, you are overseeing a program to build a new commercial complex in a bustling city center. To effectively manage stakeholder expectations and ensure program success, you decide to conduct a stakeholder analysis using the Mendelow's Power-Interest Matrix. After analyzing the stakeholders, you find that the city's mayor has high power and high interest in the program, while some local business owners have low power but high interest. What is the most appropriate approach for managing these stakeholders?

Correct Answer: Collaborate closely with the city's mayor, providing regular updates and seeking their input on key decisions. Engage with local business owners to understand their concerns and keep them informed of the program's progress.

The most appropriate approach for managing these stakeholders is to collaborate closely with the city's mayor, providing regular updates and seeking their input on key decisions, while also engaging with local business owners to understand their concerns and keep them informed of the program's progress. This is because the mayor has high power and high interest in the program, making them a key player who should be managed closely. On the other hand, local business owners have high interest but low power, so they should be kept informed and their concerns should be addressed, but they do not require the same level of close collaboration as the mayor. Focusing primarily on the mayor while ignoring the local business owners fails to address the concerns of an important stakeholder group. Prioritizing the needs of local business owners over the mayor fails to recognize the mayor's high level of power and influence over the program. Treating all stakeholders equally ignores the different levels of power and interest among stakeholders and may lead to an inefficient use of resources.

Question 3

As a program manager, you are leading a large-scale digital transformation program involving multiple stakeholders. To effectively manage stakeholder engagement, you decide to conduct a stakeholder analysis using the Participation Planning Matrix model. The analysis reveals that the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) falls into the 'Collaborate' category, while some end-users are in the 'Consult' category. What is the most appropriate approach for managing these stakeholders?

Correct Answer: Actively involve the CEO in key decisions and program planning, while seeking input from end-users and incorporating their feedback where appropriate.

The most appropriate approach is to actively involve the CEO in key decisions and program planning, while seeking input from end-users and incorporating their feedback where appropriate. This approach aligns with the Participation Planning Matrix model, which suggests collaborating closely with stakeholders in the 'Collaborate' category (the CEO) and consulting with those in the 'Consult' category (some end-users). By engaging the CEO in decision-making and planning, you ensure their buy-in and support for the program. Simultaneously, by consulting with end-users and considering their input, you can identify potential issues and ensure the program meets their needs. Focusing solely on the CEO's needs or extensively involving end-users in decision-making would not strike the right balance, while treating all stakeholders equally would not account for their different levels of influence and interest in the program.

Go Premium

Program Management Professional Preparation Package (2024)

  • 2389 Superior-grade Program Management Professional practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PgMP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Classification Models for Stakeholder Analysis questions
17 questions (total)
Start 17 question test