Back to Agile Estimation Techniques

Planning Poker

5 minutes 5 Questions

Planning Poker is a collaborative game that team members play to reach consensus in the estimations. Each team member has a set of poker cards with values like 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40 and 100, which represent the Story points. The Product Owner describes the story that needs to be estimated, and then each member selects a card that represents their estimate. If there is a large discrepancy, the team discusses the story further, and estimate is done again until consensus is reached. This process considers different perspectives and estimates are more accurate.

Guide to Planning Poker, PMI-ACP Agile Estimation Technique

What is Planning Poker:
Planning Poker is a consensus-based agile estimation technique. It is a fun and interactive method to estimate effort or relative size of tasks in software development. Planning Poker combines expert opinion, analogy, and disaggregation into an enjoyable approach to estimating that results in quick but reliable estimates.

Why it is Important:
Planning Poker encourages team collaboration and ensures that all voices are heard. It promotes healthy discussion on task details and reduces bias in estimates, making it a preferred tool in agile project environments.

How it Works:
Planning Poker involves the following steps:

  1. Each estimator is given a set of Planning Poker Cards, each card representing a valid estimate.
  2. The item for estimation is presented and discussed.
  3. Each estimator privately selects a card representing their estimate.
  4. Cards are revealed simultaneously.
  5. If estimates vary widely, a discussion is held. The high and low estimators justify their estimates and the process repeats until a consensus is reached.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Planning Poker:
  1. Understanding the steps in the Planning Poker process is crucial.
  2. Remember that the goal of Planning Poker is to reach consensus, not to arrive at an exact estimate.
  3. It is important to note that Planning Poker is a tool for promoting discussion and collaboration, not a mandate on how long a task should take.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-ACP - Agile Estimation Techniques Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

A team has assigned effort scores during planning poker, but the majority of scores are followed by a long period of silence. What should the team do?

Correct Answer: Encourage team members to voice their thoughts and engage in discussion.

Planning poker relies on open communication and collaboration among team members. Encouraging members to share their thoughts and engage in discussion can help reach an accurate consensus.

Question 2

During a Planning Poker session, the team cannot come to a consensus on an estimate because one member strongly believes the task is more complicated than others do. How should the Scrum Master handle this?

Correct Answer: Encourage the team member to share his concerns and reasons, promoting a constructive discussion for others to possibly reassess their estimates.

The best way to handle a disagreement in a Planning Poker session is to promote open communication. The Scrum Master should encourage the team member to voice their concerns and explain why they believe the task is more complicated. This could lead to a constructive discussion, which might even cause others to reassess their estimates. Ignoring the member's opinion ([Answer text: 'Ignore the team member's opinion and go with the majority estimate.']) or telling them they are wrong and to conform to the majority ([Answer text: 'Tell the team member that they are mistaken and should conform to the group's estimate.']) would not promote open communication and could lead to tension within the team. Voting again in the hopes that the team will support the concerned member's opinion ([Answer text: 'Ask the team to vote again expecting that they change their estimates in favor of the concerned team member.']) is not a constructive approach and does not address the underlying reasons for the disagreement.

Question 3

During a planning poker, a team member suggests an estimate significantly lower than the rest of the team. What should the Scrum Master do?

Correct Answer: Encourage the team member to share insights that led to the lower estimate to foster understanding.

The correct approach is to encourage open communication and understanding among team members. This ensures that all perspectives are considered and helps the team learn from each other. Suggesting a weighted voting system might prioritize the opinions of certain members over others, which can stifle open discussion. Splitting the task could avoid the issue rather than addressing the discrepancy in understanding the task's complexity. Recommending a purely consensus-based approach could lead to unnecessary compromises that might not accurately reflect the team's understanding of the work involved.

Go Premium

PMI Agile Certified Practitioner Preparation Package (2024)

  • 3432 Superior-grade PMI Agile Certified Practitioner practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-ACP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Planning Poker questions
26 questions (total)
Start 26 question test