Adaptive Planning

Correct Answer: Reflect on and learn from the past sprints, adjust the team's velocity estimate, and plan future sprints based on a more accurate capacity estimate.

The best way to handle the issue of the project team consistently missing deadlines due to overestimation of their capabilities from an adaptive planning perspective is to 'Reflect on and learn from the past sprints, adjust the team's velocity estimate, and plan future sprints based on a more accurate capacity estimate.'. This is because adaptive planning is about making changes and improvements based on past experiences. It's about learning from what has been done before and updating plans accordingly. This answer advocates for this iterative, learning approach. The answer suggesting to 'Increase the workload to force the team to meet the initial estimates.' is wrong. Forcing a team to meet initial estimates by increasing the workload could lead to burnout, lower quality work, and decreased morale. The answer suggesting to 'Ignore the delays assuming things will improve on their own.' is also wrong. Without taking any action to correct the issue, the problem is likely to persist and could potentially worsen. Finally, the suggestion to 'Replace the team members who are underperforming.' could be an extreme solution. Firing team members should not be the first course of action. It's much more favourable to improve the estimation and planning processes.

Correct Answer: Re-develop the project plan, changing the method of work and adjusting the tasks and timelines accordingly

In a situation where a chosen method of work is inefficient, the most effective course of action would be to re-develop the project plan, changing the method of work and adjusting the tasks and timelines accordingly. This is the major premise behind adaptive planning. Project managers should be flexible and ready to adapt the plan to evolving demands. The idea is to keep the project efficient and effective, even if it means altering the original plan. Ignoring the problem can lead to inefficiencies and possible project failure in the long run. Hence, it's not ideal. Also, continuing with the current method but starting to plan a second project with a new method is a waste of resources, as it implies running two projects concurrently when one project can be improved. Finally, changing the method of work without modifying the plan would not yield the desired results, as tasks, resources, and timelines may not align with the new method.

Correct Answer: Revisit and revise the project plan, factoring in the newfound complexities to maintain the scope, quality, and deliverables of the project.

The best course of action in this scenario would be to 'Revisit and revise the project plan, factoring in the newfound complexities to maintain the scope, quality, and deliverables of the project.' This is a methodology in line with Agile principles, which values responding to change over following a fixed plan. Project Managers in Agile environments need to continuously reassess and adapt their strategies to the changing circumstances. The concept of iterative planning and continuous improvement is one of the core values of Agile. The option 'Continue with the original plan, expecting the team to work overtime' is not a good practice in Project Management. It can lead to burnout making the team less productive overall, which contradicts Agile's emphasis on sustainable development'Abandon the project because it is not proceeding as planned' is highly extreme and unfitting with Agile principles, which value the ability to adapt to change and challengesLastly, 'Keeping the complexities hidden from the stakeholders' contradicts the Agile value of transparency and open communication, which are key for managing the expectations of stakeholders and building trust.