Automated Testing

Correct Answer: Incorporate Automated Testing for the repetitive and data-driven tests to reduce the overall testing time.

In the context of an Agile project, one of the best practices is to automate tests as much as possible, especially for repetitive and data-driven tests. This allows for more efficient use of time and resources, and can help teams meet their sprint deadlines more reliably. In this scenario, the best solution is indeed to 'Incorporate Automated Testing for the repetitive and data-driven tests to reduce the overall testing time'. The second option, 'Manually test all elements to ensure quality', is not an efficient solution, because it would actually increase the load of manual testing, which is already causing the team to not meet their sprint deadline. The third option, 'Skip testing for this sprint to meet the deadline', is also not viable because it would jeopardize the quality of the product, which goes against Agile principles. The last option, 'Automate complete testing, regardless of its type or importance', is also not the best course of action, because not all tests can or should be automated. Some types of testing, such as usability or exploratory testing, are best done manually.

Correct Answer: Update the automated test script regularly to adapt to UI changes.

The most effective solution to the Agile team's issue with the automated test failing due to UI changes would be to update the automated test script regularly to adapt to these changes. This option ensures that the test stays relevant and effective as the UI evolves, thereby maintaining the advantages of automation such as increased efficiency and test coverage. Ignoring the test because it's failing due to external changes is not a good practice as it bypasses an integral part of the development process, which is quality control. Getting rid of the automated testing and testing manually is not efficient or practical for a method like Agile where fast iterations and frequent changes are common. Running the automated test more frequently without making changes to adapt to the UI changes would only result in more frequent failures.

Correct Answer: Start small and gradually increase the scope of automated test cases.

Shifting to automated testing from manual testing is a significant move and it needs to be done strategically. 'Starting small and gradually increasing the scope of automated test cases' is the most sustainable and risk-free approach. Starting small allows the team to understand how the automated system works, recognize problems, and make necessary adjustments, while gradually increasing the scope helps to handle the amount of work and ensures the quality is not compromised. 'Automating all test cases simultaneously' is not wise practice as it does not allow for gradual adoption and may overwhelm the team with sudden major changes. Ignoring any edge case and automating only standard cases is also not an efficient way because edge cases can lead to software failures and they must be considered. Lastly, the option of 'Automate only hard-to-test cases' seems logical at first glance, because these are the cases that demand a significant portion of testing time but automating only hard-to-test cases and ignoring the rest might create a gap in the testing routine leading to software quality issues.