Three Amigos

Correct Answer: Call for an additional meeting with stakeholders to discuss possible impacts and review the project's scope.

In the case where a team member pushes for a user story revision that goes against the project's current scope, the best course of action would be to call for an additional meeting with stakeholders to discuss possible impacts and revise the project’s scope if necessary. This is because any major change in scope should involve discussion and agreement from all project stakeholders to ensure everyone is aligned with potential impacts, costs and timeline revisions. Ignoring the suggestions and continuing with the current scope can be detrimental as it could miss out on potentially beneficial changes. Additionally, revising the scope without informing stakeholders and starting to work on the new scope right away disregards the value of collaboration and agreement in a project, potentially causing project disruption, miscommunication and failure.

Correct Answer: Participate in a discussion with the Three Amigos to gain a shared understanding and find a resolution.

In the Three Amigos strategy, three perspectives of the team (usually Business Analyst, Developer, and QA) come together to discuss and get a unified understanding of a user story or feature. So, the best way to address the issue would be to 'Participate in a discussion with the Three Amigos to gain a shared understanding and find a resolution.' As for the other options: - 'Allow the product owner to make the final decision.' This option is not ideal because the Three Amigos method encourages collaborative decision-making. Just allowing the product owner to make the final decision would override the benefits of diverse perspectives and shared understanding. - 'Ignore the conflict and proceed as per your understanding.' This approach directly contradicts the purpose of the Three Amigos strategy. The method aims to provide a shared understanding and reduce conflicts; ignoring the conflict would be against these ideals. - 'Take a vote and proceed with the majority’s decision.' While this method does involve some group participation, it doesn't necessarily encourage or assure shared understanding, and can lead to conflict if the minority feel their views are being dismissed.

Correct Answer: Promptly raise the issue in the session and work together with the team to align the business narrative with the project's goals.

The best course of action when a business narrative does not align with the project's goal is to 'Promptly raise the issue in the session and work together with the team to align the business narrative with the project's goals'. This approach emphasizes collaboration as a fundamental principle of Agile and promotes cross-functional communication. The other options are not recommended. 'Disregard the business narrative as it is not a technical requirement' indicates a short-sighted perspective as business narratives often include important user and business perspectives. 'Privately ask the product owner to revise the business narrative' isolates the rest of the team and does not encourage the collective problem-solving that Agile leans towards. 'Create your own version of the business narrative and share it with the team' could create confusion and does not directly address the need to align the existing narrative with project goals.