Build Quality In

Correct Answer: Implement pair programming and peer code reviews to reduce bugs and improve code quality.

The best approach to improve build quality in an Agile project is to 'implement pair programming and peer code reviews'. This approach encourages collaboration, helps in sharing knowledge among team members, and it is more likely to identify and fix bugs at an early stage resulting in improved code quality. This also adheres to Agile principles of regular reflection and adjustment for increased effectiveness. Increasing the teams working hours is not a sustainable or effective solution. It could lead to burnout and decreased productivity in the long run. The quality of work is more important than the quantity in Agile methodology. Skipping testing of minor features with an intention to save time can lead to major issues down the line if those features don't work as expected or cause unexpected behavior in other parts of the application. Thorough testing is crucial for any feature regardless of its size or perceived importance. Implementing a 'bug bounty' while can be a motivator for team members to find bugs, it does not necessarily assure the improvement of build quality or code. The focus turns to finding bugs for reward rather than creating quality code at the onset. This could lead to a culture of developing quick, sloppy code with the hope of finding more bugs to get rewards. Hence, it is not a recommended approach in Agile.

Correct Answer: Optimize and prioritize tests

Optimizing and prioritizing tests will help maintain build quality by ensuring that the most critical tests run first, and lower-priority tests can be scheduled during slower periods. Removing automated testing, allowing additional time for CI execution, requesting more resources, only enabling smoke tests, or building a custom CI tool do not address the core need for maintaining build quality.

Correct Answer: Explain the impact of additional features on the project's velocity

Explaining the impact of additional features on the project's velocity helps educate stakeholders on how their decisions affect the project and build quality. Accepting additional features without question, working overtime, replacing team members, stopping the tracking of project velocity, or ignoring stakeholder input does not maintain build quality.