Agile Release Train test - Scaled Agile (SAFe) - PMI Agile Certified Practitioner questions

Question 1

A team within the Agile Release Train (ART) has frequently missed their objectives during the past two Program Increments (PI). It appears that the team is not accurately forecasting their work capacity. What approach should the Release Train Engineer (RTE) take to improve the situation?

Adjust the PI length to accommodate the team’s inability to commit Remove the team from the Agile Release Train Work with the team’s Scrum Master to facilitate workshops on capacity planning and estimation Permanently decrease the team’s capacity Ask the Product Manager to limit the team’s work Alter the team’s velocity calculation

Correct Answer: Work with the team’s Scrum Master to facilitate workshops on capacity planning and estimation

The correct answer is to work with the team’s Scrum Master to facilitate workshops on capacity planning and estimation. This empowers the team to improve their planning capabilities, which can lead to more accurate forecasting and ultimately help them meet their objectives.

Question 2

The Agile Release Train (ART) is experiencing issues because teams are not respecting the agreed-upon Program Increament (PI) boundaries resulting in scope creep. How can this issue be best managed?

Impose strict penalties on teams crossing the boundaries Ignore the boundaries and let teams work on their pace Re-emphasize the purpose and respect for PI boundaries and enforce them strictly through guidelines and monitoring Get rid of the boundaries entirely for the sake of team autonomy

Correct Answer: Re-emphasize the purpose and respect for PI boundaries and enforce them strictly through guidelines and monitoring

Among the options, reemphasizing the purpose and respect for Program Increment (PI) boundaries and strictly enforcing them through guidelines and monitoring provides the best solution. It emphasizes respecting agreed boundaries to control scope creep while maintaining collaboration across teams involved in the Agile Release Train (ART). This answer combines the practice of Agile with the necessary governance to maintain order and productivity in a complex project environment. The other choices are less ideal. Ignoring boundaries and allowing teams to work at their own pace can lead to chaos and uncontrolled scope creep, impacting the project's timeline and quality. Imposing strict penalties on teams crossing the boundaries can create a punitive atmosphere that hampers trust and teamwork, which is against Agile principles. Finally, eliminating the boundaries entirely for the sake of team autonomy ignores the systemic view required in managing multiple teams on an ART and can result in conflicting priorities and uncontrolled change.

Question 3

The Agile Release Train (ART) has had issues with team engagement and participation during ceremonies. The Release Train Engineer (RTE) overheard a few team members expressing disinterest in attending rituals because they feel they don't achieve much. What can the RTE do to improve the situation?

Cancel all ceremonies for the next PI Avoid talking to team members who aren’t engaging Assign increased workload to disengaged team members Create new ceremonies to increase participation Inform the team that ceremonies are required by the Agile framework Facilitate a retrospective focused on improving ceremony effectiveness

Correct Answer: Facilitate a retrospective focused on improving ceremony effectiveness

The correct answer is to facilitate a retrospective focused on improving ceremony effectiveness. This allows team members to voice their concerns and collaborate to find solutions, which increases engagement and overall effectiveness of the ceremonies.

Agile Release Train

Guide to Agile Release Train in PMI-ACP Scaled Agile (SAFe)

PMI-ACP - Agile Release Train Example Questions

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

🎓 Unlock Premium Access