Product Owner

Correct Answer: David should step in and address the matter being the sole person responsible for the Product Backlog, ensuring that the development team can focus on the agreed work.

In the given scenario, Product Owner David should be the one to handle any requests for changes or additions to the Product Backlog. This is because, in Scrum methodology, the Product Owner is the sole entity responsible for managing the Product Backlog, which includes clearly expressing backlog items, ordering them and making sure they are clear to the development team. Therefore, the correct answer is 'David should step in and address the matter being the sole person responsible for the Product Backlog, ensuring that the development team can focus on the agreed work.' Other answers are incorrect for the following reasons: 'David should let the team handle it as it is a part of self-organization.' - while the scrum team is self-organizing, the Product Owner is still responsible for managing the backlog. 'David should include those functionalities without discussing with the team as it is coming from the stakeholders.' - this is against the principles of transparency and respect in Scrum. 'David should ignore the matter as it is not his responsibility.' - ignoring the issue, especially when it is the Product Owner's responsibility, can lead to inadequate product outcomes.

Correct Answer: Empower the team through trust and respect, allowing them autonomy

The best answer is 'Empower the team through trust and respect, allowing them autonomy'. In an Agile Scrum, the product owner's main role is to provide direction and priorities, but the team should take responsibility for self-organizing and managing their own work within those frameworks. Therefore, empowering the team to make decisions will foster self-organization. As for the other options: 'Micromanage the team to ensure tasks are completed', this goes against the principles of Scrum, which encourage teams to self-organize and make their own decisions on how to best do their work. 'Pull back completely and leave the team to struggle' is also not a good response because while it is important for the team to learn to self-organize, they should not be left to struggle without any support or guidance. Lastly, 'Bypass the ScrumMaster and manage the team directly', this undermines the role of the ScrumMaster, who is there to facilitate communication and problem solving within the Scrum team.

Correct Answer: Schedule a product backlog refinement session to clarify user stories and acceptance criteria

The best action for Emily, the Product Owner, to take when she is concerned that the Development Team is not fully understanding the user stories is to schedule a product backlog refinement session. During this session, the user stories and their acceptance criteria can be clarified and discussed in detail with the Development Team. This allows for better understanding and alignment between the Product Owner and the Development Team. Asking the Scrum Master to explain the user stories during the daily stand-up is not the best approach, as the stand-up is meant for the Development Team to discuss their progress and plan for the day, not for detailed explanations of user stories. Providing detailed design specifications goes against the principles of Scrum, which emphasizes collaboration and flexibility. Attending the sprint planning meeting to explain the stories is not ideal, as the stories should be clarified before the sprint planning to ensure the Development Team can effectively plan their work.