Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

Correct Answer: Launch with basic appointment booking and automated confirmations

MVP (Minimum Viable Product) principles emphasize launching with core functionality that solves the primary user need while keeping development time and complexity minimal. Launching with basic appointment booking and automated confirmations represents the ideal MVP approach because: - It focuses on the essential core feature (appointment scheduling) - It includes a key automated function to reduce manual work - It allows for quick market testing and user feedback The other options are not optimal MVP approaches because: - Adding comprehensive medical history tracking creates unnecessary complexity for initial launch - Including telemedicine and prescription management goes far beyond core scheduling needs - Implementing insurance verification and payment processing adds significant technical complexity Starting with basic functionality allows the team to: - Get user feedback quickly - Validate core assumptions - Iterate based on real usage data - Add more features in future releases based on user needs

Correct Answer: Testing if the app solves a specific healthcare problem for users

Testing if the app solves a specific healthcare problem for users is the best approach because: 1. It aligns with MVP (Minimum Viable Product) principles - focusing on validating core value proposition 2. It ensures that the basic solution meets actual user needs before investing in additional features 3. It allows for quick user feedback and iterative improvements 4. It reduces risk and resource waste Why other options are incorrect: - Gathering extensive data on all potential features before development contradicts MVP philosophy by delaying validation and adding unnecessary complexity - Implementing multiple tracking capabilities from the start goes against MVP principles by overloading the initial release with features that haven't been validated - Building a complete suite of tools focuses too much on competition rather than user needs and delays market validation of core functionality The validation phase should focus on testing core assumptions about user needs with minimal features, then expand based on validated learning.

Correct Answer: The MVP contained too many features and deviated from its core testing purpose

The fundamental purpose of an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) is to test core functionalities and gather user feedback with minimal resources and time investment. The fact that 80% of features are rarely used indicates that: - The team included far more features than necessary for initial testing - Resources were spent on developing features users didn't need - The development strayed from MVP principles of simplicity and focus - Time and effort could have been saved by focusing on core features The other options are incorrect because: - Adding more sophisticated features would further complicate the product and waste resources - Maintaining unused functionalities contradicts the lean principle of eliminating waste - Adding new features before learning from current usage patterns would repeat the same mistake The key lesson is that MVPs should focus on essential features to validate core assumptions and user needs. This helps save resources and get faster market feedback for iterative improvements.