Sprint Planning

Correct Answer: Focus on relative sizing using story points, with detailed discussions only for complex items

The optimal approach during Sprint Planning is to focus on relative sizing using story points, with detailed discussions reserved for complex items. This method balances efficiency with accuracy. Here's why this is the best approach: - It promotes quick decision-making for straightforward items - Allows more time for complex items that need deeper analysis - Maintains the agile principle of relative estimation - Keeps the planning session time-boxed and efficient Why other approaches are suboptimal: - Spending equal time on all stories is inefficient and wastes time on simple items - Detailed time-based estimates contradict agile principles and create a false sense of precision - Relying solely on historical data and skipping team discussions eliminates valuable team input and context-specific considerations The best practice is to use relative sizing, focusing detailed discussions on complex items while moving efficiently through simpler ones. This approach respects both the time-box of sprint planning and the need for accurate estimation where it matters most.

Correct Answer: Use historical data and consider team capacity while applying an experience-based adjustment factor

The best practice for calculating Sprint velocity during Sprint Planning is to use historical data and consider team capacity while applying an experience-based adjustment factor. This approach is optimal because it: - Considers past performance data as a baseline - Takes into account current team capacity - Acknowledges different experience levels through adjustment factors - Provides a realistic and balanced estimation Other approaches are incorrect because: - Simply dividing previous velocities by team members oversimplifies and doesn't account for skill variations - Using only experienced team members' velocity creates unrealistic expectations for newer team members - Using the highest achieved velocity as baseline is risky and doesn't reflect current team composition or capacity The correct approach allows for: - More accurate sprint planning - Better workload distribution - Realistic expectations for team members of all experience levels - Continuous improvement through data-driven decisions

Correct Answer: Split the item into smaller, independent user stories that can be completed within the Sprint

In Sprint Planning, splitting large Product Backlog items into smaller, independent user stories is the most effective approach because: - It maintains agile principles of delivering small, valuable increments - It allows better estimation and tracking of progress - It enables the team to deliver value incrementally - It reduces complexity and risk - It facilitates better sprint planning and execution The other options are problematic because: Breaking down by technical components contradicts the value-focused approach of user stories and can lead to silos within the team. Allocating additional resources from other teams violates sprint planning principles and team stability. It also doesn't address the core issue of item size. Creating detailed technical specifications and spreading work across multiple sprints defeats the purpose of sprint planning and violates the principle of delivering complete, valuable increments within a single sprint.