Back to Decision Modeling and Analysis

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

5 minutes 5 Questions

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a decision-making framework that evaluates and prioritizes options based on multiple criteria. In the realm of business analysis, decisions are rarely based on a single factor; instead, they involve balancing a variety of quantitative and qualitative criteria such as cost, time, risk, stakeholder satisfaction, and strategic alignment. MCDA provides a structured approach to considering these diverse factors, enabling business analysts to make well-rounded and transparent decisions. MCDA involves defining the decision context, identifying the objectives and criteria, and assigning weights to each criterion based on their relative importance. Various techniques within MCDA, such as scoring models, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), or the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), assist in quantifying subjective judgments and comparing options systematically. For instance, when selecting a vendor, a business analyst might consider criteria such as cost, quality, delivery time, and after-sales service. By assigning weights to these criteria and scoring each vendor against them, MCDA helps in ranking the vendors objectively. This method increases transparency and facilitates consensus among stakeholders by making the decision-making process explicit and justifiable. Implementing MCDA enhances decision quality by ensuring all relevant factors are considered and helps in documenting the rationale behind decisions. It is particularly useful in complex scenarios where conflicting objectives exist, and trade-offs are necessary. MCDA enables the comparison of disparate criteria on a common scale, supporting more balanced and informed choices. In the PMI Professional in Business Analysis course, understanding MCDA equips professionals with the skills to handle complex decisions involving multiple, often conflicting criteria. It supports the development of solutions that best meet organizational goals and stakeholder needs by providing a clear framework for evaluating options. In summary, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis is a critical concept that enables business analysts to make balanced, objective, and justifiable decisions in complex scenarios by systematically evaluating options against a set of prioritized criteria.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-PBA - Decision Modeling and Analysis Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), what is the primary purpose of the weighting step?

Correct Answer: To assign relative importance values to each evaluation criterion

The weighting step in MCDA is fundamentally about establishing how important each criterion is relative to others in the decision-making process. The correct answer reflects this primary purpose - assigning relative importance values to each evaluation criterion. This is essential because not all criteria carry equal importance in decision-making. The other options are incorrect because: - Calculating final scores happens after weights are established and is a separate step in the MCDA process - Establishing mathematical relationships between criteria is part of the modeling phase, not the weighting step - Ranking alternatives based on performance is the final outcome of MCDA, not part of the weighting process Weighting is crucial as it helps stakeholders express their preferences and priorities numerically, allowing for systematic comparison of alternatives while considering multiple criteria with different levels of importance.

Question 2

What is a key advantage of using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis?

Correct Answer: It helps reduce cognitive bias in decision-making through pairwise comparisons

The main advantage of AHP is its use of pairwise comparisons to break down complex decisions into simpler, manageable comparisons. This systematic approach helps minimize cognitive bias by allowing decision-makers to focus on comparing just two elements at a time. The correct answer accurately reflects this key benefit of AHP - reducing cognitive bias through structured pairwise comparisons, making complex decisions more manageable and consistent. The other options are incorrect because: - AHP does not guarantee optimal decisions or completely eliminate human judgment errors - it is a tool to support human decision-making, not replace it - AHP actually relies heavily on stakeholder input and expert judgment through the pairwise comparison process, rather than eliminating it - AHP requires manual weighting of criteria through the pairwise comparison process - it does not automatically assign weights based on historical data

Question 3

During risk assessment in a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), what is the recommended approach for handling uncertainties in criteria weights?

Correct Answer: Conduct sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of weight variations on final rankings

Sensitivity analysis is the most appropriate approach for handling uncertainties in criteria weights during MCDA risk assessment for several reasons: 1. It systematically examines how changes in weight assignments affect the final outcome 2. It helps identify which criteria are most influential in the decision-making process 3. It provides insights into the robustness of the decision analysis 4. It aligns with best practices in business analysis for understanding decision impacts Regarding other approaches: Standard deviation calculations are too simplistic and fail to capture the complex relationships between different criteria weights. Mathematical normalization of weights into a single value loses important information about individual criteria importance and their relationships. Monte Carlo simulations, while useful in some contexts, may introduce unnecessary complexity and randomness when what's needed is a structured understanding of weight relationships and their impacts on outcomes. Sensitivity analysis provides the most practical and insightful approach for business analysts to understand and communicate the implications of weight uncertainties in MCDA.

Go Premium

PMI Professional in Business Analysis Preparation Package (2024)

  • 3015 Superior-grade PMI Professional in Business Analysis practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-PBA preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis questions
12 questions (total)
Start 12 question test