Back to Requirements Analysis and Documentation

Requirements Prioritization Techniques

5 minutes 5 Questions

Requirements Prioritization Techniques are essential tools in business analysis that help organizations determine the relative importance of various requirements. These techniques ensure that the most critical and valuable requirements are addressed first, aligning project outcomes with business objectives and stakeholder needs. Since resources such as time, budget, and personnel are often limited, prioritization helps in making informed decisions about which requirements to implement immediately, defer, or even discard. Several techniques are commonly used for prioritizing requirements: - **MoSCoW Method**: This technique categorizes requirements into Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won't Have. It helps in quickly identifying the essential requirements that are critical for project success. - **Kano Model**: This model analyzes customer satisfaction versus the implementation of requirements, categorizing features into Basic Needs, Performance Needs, and Excitement Needs to understand their impact on user satisfaction. - **100-Point Method**: Stakeholders are given 100 points to distribute among requirements, indicating the importance they assign to each. This method quantifies stakeholder preferences effectively. - **Paired Comparison Analysis**: Requirements are compared in pairs to determine which of the two is more important, helping in ranking requirements systematically. - **Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)**: A structured technique that uses mathematics and psychology to analyze and prioritize requirements based on multiple criteria. Effective prioritization ensures that the development team focuses on delivering high-value features first, which can improve return on investment and stakeholder satisfaction. It also aids in managing scope and expectations, as stakeholders can see how their input directly influences project priorities. Challenges in requirements prioritization include conflicting stakeholder interests, changing business environments, and the difficulty in quantifying the value of certain requirements. To address these challenges, business analysts must facilitate transparent communication, employ objective criteria for prioritization, and be prepared to revisit priorities as necessary. In conclusion, Requirements Prioritization Techniques are critical for guiding project teams in making strategic decisions about resource allocation, ensuring that the final product delivers maximum value to both the business and its stakeholders.

Requirements Prioritization Techniques: A Comprehensive Guide

Why Requirements Prioritization Is Important

Requirements prioritization is a critical process in project management and business analysis because it helps teams:

• Deliver maximum business value early
• Allocate limited resources effectively
• Focus on what matters most to stakeholders
• Manage scope and prevent feature creep
• Create realistic project schedules
• Make informed trade-off decisions

In the context of the PMI-PBA certification, understanding various prioritization techniques is essential for demonstrating your ability to manage requirements strategically.

What Are Requirements Prioritization Techniques?

Requirement prioritization techniques are structured methods used to rank requirements based on criteria such as business value, cost, risk, dependencies, and stakeholder preferences. These techniques help business analysts and project teams determine which requirements should be implemented first and which can be deferred or eliminated.

Common Requirements Prioritization Techniques

1. MoSCoW Method
This technique categorizes requirements into four groups:
• Must have: Critical requirements that must be included
• Should have: Important but not critical requirements
• Could have: Desirable requirements that can be included if resources permit
• Won't have (this time): Requirements that are recognized but postponed

2. Kano Model
Categorizes requirements based on customer satisfaction:
• Basic needs (Threshold): Features expected by customers
• Performance needs (Linear): Features that increase satisfaction proportionally
• Excitement needs (Delighters): Unexpected features that significantly increase satisfaction
• Indifferent: Features customers don't care about
• Reverse: Features that cause dissatisfaction when present

3. 100-Point Method (Cumulative Voting)
Each stakeholder receives 100 points to distribute among requirements, allocating more points to higher-priority items.

4. Relative Prioritization/Ranking
Requirements are compared against each other and ranked in order of importance.

5. Pair-wise Comparison
Each requirement is compared to every other requirement to determine relative priority.

6. Dot Voting
Stakeholders use adhesive dots to vote for their preferred requirements on a visible display.

7. Benefit-Cost Analysis (Value vs. Effort)
Requirements are plotted on a matrix based on business value and implementation effort/cost.

8. Weighted Criteria Analysis
Multiple criteria are weighted according to importance, and requirements are scored against these criteria.

How Requirements Prioritization Works in Practice

Step 1: Identify Prioritization Criteria
Define what factors matter for your project (e.g., business value, urgency, implementation cost, risks).

Step 2: Select Appropriate Technique(s)
Choose prioritization techniques based on project context, organizational culture, and stakeholder preferences.

Step 3: Gather Stakeholder Input
Involve key stakeholders in the prioritization process to ensure buy-in and capture diverse perspectives.

Step 4: Apply the Technique
Implement the chosen prioritization method(s) in a structured manner.

Step 5: Review and Refine
Analyze results, resolve conflicts, and finalize priority decisions.

Step 6: Document and Communicate
Record prioritization outcomes and communicate them to all relevant stakeholders.

Step 7: Revisit Periodically
Priorities may change as the project progresses or as business needs evolve.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Requirements Prioritization Techniques

1. Recognize the Appropriate Technique
• Be able to identify which prioritization technique is being described
• Understand when each technique is most beneficial
• Recognize the strengths and limitations of each approach

2. Apply the Right Process
• Know the steps involved in each prioritization method
• Understand how to apply the techniques to different scenarios
• Recognize common implementation pitfalls

3. Focus on Stakeholder Engagement
• Emphasize the importance of involving appropriate stakeholders
• Know how to handle conflicting stakeholder priorities
• Understand how to facilitate prioritization sessions effectively

4. Connect Prioritization to Project Outcomes
• Link prioritization decisions to business value delivery
• Understand how prioritization affects project planning and execution
• Recognize how prioritization supports scope management

5. Be Aware of Context Considerations
• Understand that no single technique works in all situations
• Consider factors like project size, complexity, and constraints
• Recognize when to combine multiple prioritization approaches

6. Watch for Tricky Questions
• Pay attention to questions asking about the most appropriate technique for a specific scenario
• Be careful with questions that present subtle variations of techniques
• Read all options carefully as some may seem similar but have key differences

7. Practice Applying Techniques
• Work through sample scenarios to solidify your understanding
• Calculate priority scores using different methods
• Practice identifying which requirements would be prioritized given specific constraints

Remember that the PMI-PBA exam focuses on practical application rather than just theoretical knowledge. Be prepared to analyze scenarios and determine the most appropriate prioritization approach based on the given context.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-PBA - Requirements Analysis and Documentation Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

Which prioritization technique involves assigning numerical values from 1-10 to requirements based on business value, cost, risk, and dependencies?

Correct Answer: Multi-criteria analysis using weighted scores

Multi-criteria analysis using weighted scores is the correct technique for this scenario, as it specifically involves assigning numerical values (typically 1-10) to evaluate requirements across multiple dimensions including business value, cost, risk, and dependencies. This method helps create an objective scoring system that enables stakeholders to compare and rank requirements based on quantifiable metrics. The other options are incorrect because: Time-based prioritization focuses on scheduling and sequential ordering rather than multi-dimensional scoring. The MoSCoW method uses categorical prioritization (Must, Should, Could, Won't) rather than numerical scoring. The Kano model primarily focuses on customer satisfaction categories and does not typically employ a 1-10 numerical scoring system for multiple criteria.

Question 2

What prioritization technique uses pair-wise comparisons to rank requirements by having stakeholders evaluate two requirements at a time?

Correct Answer: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is the correct answer as it is a well-established prioritization technique that specifically uses pair-wise comparisons to rank requirements. AHP works by having stakeholders compare two requirements at a time, determining their relative importance using a scale. This systematic approach reduces complexity by breaking down multiple comparisons into simple pairs, making it easier for stakeholders to make consistent decisions. The other options are incorrect: Multiple Criteria Decision Making Matrix uses weighted criteria but doesn't specifically focus on pair-wise comparisons. Time-boxed Priority Assessment Framework is a made-up term that combines time-boxing with priority assessment, but this isn't a recognized methodology for pair-wise requirement comparisons. Iterative Ranking Matrix with sequential pair evaluations sounds similar but is not a recognized formal technique like AHP for requirement prioritization.

Question 3

In the MoSCoW prioritization technique used in business analysis, what does the second 'S' stand for?

Correct Answer: Should have - Important requirements that are not vital but add significant value

In the MoSCoW prioritization method, the second 'S' stands for 'Should have', which refers to important requirements that add significant value but are not vital for the minimum viable product. This technique uses the following categories: M - Must have (essential) S - Should have (important but not vital) C - Could have (desired but not necessary) W - Won't have (for future consideration) The other options are incorrect because: - 'Schedule based' is not part of the MoSCoW acronym and prioritization is based on business value, not timelines - 'Stakeholder approved' is a status of requirements rather than a prioritization category - 'System critical' would fall under 'Must have' category if it were essential for operations

Go Premium

PMI Professional in Business Analysis Preparation Package (2025)

  • 3015 Superior-grade PMI Professional in Business Analysis practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-PBA preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Requirements Prioritization Techniques questions
12 questions (total)
Start 12 question test