Back to Requirements Prioritization Techniques

Weighted Scoring Method

5 minutes 5 Questions

The Weighted Scoring Method is a quantitative technique used to prioritize requirements by assigning scores based on multiple criteria, each with an associated weight reflecting its relative importance. This method involves identifying key criteria relevant to the project's success—such as cost, benefit, risk, strategic alignment, and customer satisfaction—and then evaluating each requirement against these criteria. To implement the Weighted Scoring Method, stakeholders first agree on the selection of criteria and assign a weight to each criterion, typically on a scale where the total weights sum up to 100% or 1.0. The weights represent the significance of each criterion relative to the others. Each requirement is then scored against each criterion, usually on a consistent scale such as 1 to 5 or 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate better fulfillment of the criterion. The weighted score for each requirement is calculated by multiplying the score it received for each criterion by the weight of that criterion and then summing these values across all criteria. The requirements can then be ranked based on their total weighted scores, with higher scores indicating higher priority. The Weighted Scoring Method offers several benefits: it accommodates multiple evaluation factors, providing a balanced view of each requirement's importance; it transforms qualitative judgments into quantitative scores, facilitating objective comparison; and it enhances transparency and stakeholder buy-in by making the prioritization process explicit. However, the method's effectiveness relies heavily on the careful selection of criteria, accurate weighting, and consistent scoring. Biases can be introduced if stakeholders manipulate weights or scores to favor certain requirements. It can also become complex if too many criteria are used, making the process cumbersome. Despite these potential drawbacks, the Weighted Scoring Method remains a widely used and effective tool for requirements prioritization, enabling teams to make informed, strategic decisions aligned with project goals.

Weighted Scoring Method: A Comprehensive Guide for the PMI-PBA Exam

Why Weighted Scoring Method is Important

The Weighted Scoring Method is a critical requirements prioritization technique in business analysis that helps stakeholders make objective decisions when selecting from multiple options. Its importance stems from:

• It provides a systematic approach to evaluate options based on multiple criteria
• It ensures stakeholder values are appropriately represented in decision-making
• It transforms subjective preferences into quantifiable data
• It creates transparency and defensibility in the prioritization process
• It is frequently tested on the PMI-PBA exam as a key prioritization technique

What is the Weighted Scoring Method?

The Weighted Scoring Method is a quantitative technique used to compare multiple options (such as requirements, features, or projects) against a set of weighted criteria to determine the most valuable options to implement. It combines:

• Defined evaluation criteria (factors important to stakeholders)
• Assigned weights to each criterion (reflecting relative importance)
• Scores for how well each option satisfies each criterion
• Mathematical calculations to produce a total weighted score

This method is particularly useful when decision-makers need to consider multiple factors simultaneously and when there are competing priorities among stakeholders.

How the Weighted Scoring Method Works

Step 1: Identify Evaluation Criteria
Determine what factors are important for evaluating options (e.g., strategic alignment, cost, technical feasibility, customer value, risk).

Step 2: Assign Weights to Criteria
Distribute a total of 100% across all criteria based on their relative importance. For example:
• Strategic alignment: 30%
• Cost: 25%
• Technical feasibility: 20%
• Customer value: 15%
• Risk: 10%

Step 3: Define Scoring Scale
Create a consistent rating scale for all criteria (typically 1-5, 1-10, or similar).
• Example: 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Average, 4=Good, 5=Excellent

Step 4: Score Each Option
Rate each option against each criterion using the defined scale.

Step 5: Calculate Weighted Scores
For each option and criterion:
• Multiply the criterion weight by the option's score
• Sum all weighted scores for each option

Step 6: Rank Options
Order options based on their total weighted scores, with higher scores indicating higher priority.

Example Calculation:

For Requirement A:
• Strategic alignment (30%): Score 4 → 30% × 4 = 1.2
• Cost (25%): Score 3 → 25% × 3 = 0.75
• Technical feasibility (20%): Score 5 → 20% × 5 = 1.0
• Customer value (15%): Score 4 → 15% × 4 = 0.6
• Risk (10%): Score 2 → 10% × 2 = 0.2
• Total weighted score: 3.75

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Weighted Scoring Method

Calculation Questions:
• Pay close attention to the weights and scores provided in the question
• Convert percentage weights to decimal form (e.g., 30% = 0.3) for calculations
• Double-check your multiplication and addition
• Remember that weights must total 100%
• Be careful with rounding - follow the question's instructions on decimal places

Conceptual Questions:
• Understand that this method balances multiple criteria using stakeholder-defined weights
• Remember it's an objective, quantitative approach for comparing options
• Know that it's best used with a manageable number of criteria (usually 5-9)
• Recognize its application in various contexts (requirements, features, projects, vendors)

Application Questions:
• Identify when weighted scoring is appropriate versus other prioritization methods
• Know its strengths (objective, considers multiple factors) and limitations (can be time-consuming)
• Understand that weights should reflect stakeholder values and business priorities
• Recognize that criteria should be independent of each other to avoid double-counting

Common Question Traps:
• Mixing up weights and scores in calculations
• Using incorrect mathematical operations
• Misinterpreting which direction is better (higher vs. lower scores)
• Applying equal weights when the question implies different weights should be used

By mastering the Weighted Scoring Method, you'll be well-equipped to handle a variety of prioritization scenarios in both the PMI-PBA exam and real-world business analysis work.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-PBA - Requirements Prioritization Techniques Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In the Weighted Scoring Method, what is the recommended approach when a criterion has received varying scores from different evaluators?

Correct Answer: Calculate the average score from all evaluators before applying the weight

Calculating the average score from all evaluators before applying the weight is the correct approach in the Weighted Scoring Method. When multiple evaluators provide different scores for the same criterion, it's essential to normalize their input before applying weights. This ensures: 1. Equal representation of all evaluator opinions 2. Balanced assessment of the criterion 3. Reduced impact of extreme scores 4. Consistent application of weights The other approaches are incorrect because: - Multiplying each score by the weight before averaging can skew the final results and overemphasize individual opinions - Using the median score loses valuable input from other evaluators and may not reflect the true consensus - Selecting the highest score introduces bias and doesn't represent the collective evaluation accurately

Question 2

In a Weighted Scoring Method analysis, what is the best practice for handling a criterion that is difficult to quantify, such as vendor reputation?

Correct Answer: Convert qualitative assessments into numeric values using a predefined rating scale

Converting qualitative assessments into numeric values using a predefined rating scale is the best practice for handling difficult-to-quantify criteria in Weighted Scoring Method analysis. This approach: - Provides a structured way to evaluate subjective criteria - Ensures consistency across evaluations - Makes it possible to compare different vendors objectively - Allows for clear documentation of the evaluation process The other options are less effective because: - Using standardized multipliers based on historical data may be too rigid and fail to capture current market conditions - Simply averaging customer feedback scores oversimplifies the evaluation and may miss important nuances in vendor performance - Using industry benchmarks as absolute values doesn't account for specific organizational needs and may not reflect the true value of vendor reputation in your context A predefined rating scale (e.g., 1-5 or 1-10) with clear definitions for each level helps transform subjective assessments into quantifiable data while maintaining transparency and fairness in the evaluation process.

Question 3

When using the Weighted Scoring Method, what is the primary purpose of normalizing scores before applying weights?

Correct Answer: To ensure fair comparison across different scoring scales

The primary purpose of normalizing scores in the Weighted Scoring Method is to establish a fair comparison across different scoring scales. This is essential because: Different criteria might be measured using varying scales (e.g., 1-5, 1-10, or percentages) Normalization converts all scores to a common scale, enabling meaningful comparisons It prevents criteria with larger scales from dominating the final result unfairly Why other options are incorrect: Equal weightage is not the purpose of normalization - weights are applied after normalization to reflect different priorities Simplifying calculations is not the main goal - while normalization may help with calculations, this is a secondary benefit Stakeholder preferences are addressed through weights, not through normalization - normalization is about creating a level playing field for comparison

Go Premium

PMI Professional in Business Analysis Preparation Package (2025)

  • 3015 Superior-grade PMI Professional in Business Analysis practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-PBA preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Weighted Scoring Method questions
10 questions (total)
Start 10 question test