Back to Risk Identification and Management

Qualitative Risk Analysis

5 minutes 5 Questions

Qualitative Risk Analysis is a process employed by business analysts to assess the impact and likelihood of identified risks, prioritizing them for further action. This analysis focuses on evaluating risks based on subjective judgment and qualitative measures rather than numerical data. It is an essential step in the risk management process to understand which risks require immediate attention and resources. The process begins by assigning a probability and impact rating to each risk. Probability refers to the chance of the risk occurring, while impact assesses the potential effect on project objectives such as scope, schedule, cost, or quality. These ratings are often based on predefined criteria and scales to ensure consistency. Tools like risk probability and impact matrices are used to plot risks, visually representing their relative severity. Risks categorized as high probability and high impact are prioritized for detailed analysis and response planning. Conversely, risks with low probability and impact may be monitored without immediate action. Qualitative analysis also considers factors such as the urgency of the risk, manageability, and the organization's risk tolerance. Expert judgment plays a significant role in qualitative analysis. Inputs from experienced team members, stakeholders, and subject matter experts help in accurately assessing risks. Structured techniques like interviews and facilitated workshops can enhance the reliability of the assessments. The output of qualitative risk analysis includes updated risk registers with prioritization levels, providing clarity on which risks to address promptly. It also lays the groundwork for quantitative risk analysis if needed, where numerical techniques are applied to further analyze critical risks. By effectively conducting qualitative risk analysis, business analysts can allocate resources efficiently, focus on significant risks, and develop appropriate risk responses. This process helps in managing uncertainties proactively, improving decision-making, and increasing the likelihood of project success. It also fosters stakeholder confidence by demonstrating a structured approach to risk management.

Qualitative Risk Analysis Guide for PMI-PBA Exam

Introduction to Qualitative Risk Analysis

Qualitative Risk Analysis is a critical component of the risk management process in business analysis and project management. This guide will help you understand what it is, why it matters, how it works, and how to excel at related exam questions.

Why is Qualitative Risk Analysis Important?

Qualitative Risk Analysis helps teams:

- Prioritize risks based on their potential impact and probability
- Focus attention on high-priority risks
- Establish a foundation for more detailed analysis (like Quantitative Analysis)
- Provide a structured approach to risk evaluation when numerical data is limited
- Support informed decision-making by stakeholders
- Create a shared understanding of project risks across the team

What is Qualitative Risk Analysis?

Qualitative Risk Analysis is the process of assessing the priority of identified risks by evaluating their probability of occurrence and impact on project objectives. Unlike quantitative analysis, which uses numerical measurements, qualitative analysis relies on subjective judgments, expert opinions, and predefined rating scales.

It typically follows risk identification and precedes quantitative risk analysis (when performed). The output is a prioritized list of risks that helps determine which risks need response planning and which may simply need monitoring.

How Qualitative Risk Analysis Works

Step 1: Review Risk Information
Begin by reviewing all identified risks, their triggers, and any available background information.

Step 2: Assess Probability
Evaluate how likely each risk is to occur using predefined scales (such as Very Low, Low, Medium, High, Very High).

Step 3: Assess Impact
Determine the potential effect of each risk on project objectives (scope, time, cost, quality) using similar scales.

Step 4: Create Probability and Impact Matrix
Plot risks on a matrix where one axis represents probability and the other represents impact.

Step 5: Prioritize Risks
Categorize risks as High, Medium, or Low priority based on their position in the matrix.

Step 6: Update Risk Register
Document the results, including priority levels and any other qualitative information.

Key Tools and Techniques

1. Probability and Impact Matrix: A grid that maps the probability of occurrence against the potential impact.

2. Risk Data Quality Assessment: Evaluates the degree to which the data about risks is accurate and reliable.

3. Risk Categorization: Organizing risks by sources (technical, external, organizational, project management).

4. Risk Urgency Assessment: Identifies risks requiring near-term responses.

5. Expert Judgment: Leveraging expertise from team members and stakeholders.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Qualitative Risk Analysis

1. Know the Key Differences: Understand how qualitative analysis differs from quantitative analysis. Qualitative is subjective and focuses on relative priority; quantitative uses numerical values and focuses on measurable impacts.

2. Understand the Sequence: Remember that qualitative analysis typically follows risk identification and may precede quantitative analysis.

3. Recognize Inputs and Outputs: Key inputs include the risk register and risk management plan. Primary outputs include updated risk register with priorities and risk categorization.

4. Master the P-I Matrix: Be able to interpret and apply the Probability-Impact matrix, especially questions asking you to prioritize a set of risks.

5. Apply Critical Thinking: For scenario-based questions, analyze whether the scenario calls for qualitative analysis or if it has moved into quantitative territory.

6. Use Appropriate Terminology: Use terms like "probability," "impact," "risk score," and "risk ranking" correctly.

7. Recognize Common Mistakes: Watch for answers that confuse qualitative and quantitative methods or that suggest skipping steps in the process.

8. Connect to Business Analysis: Remember the role of the business analyst in facilitating risk discussions and communicating risk priorities to stakeholders.

Example Exam Scenario:

A business analyst has identified multiple risks for a new CRM implementation. One question might ask:

"Which of the following would be the MOST appropriate next step after identifying these risks?"

The correct answer would typically involve performing qualitative risk analysis to prioritize the risks before deciding which ones need detailed response plans.

Remember: Qualitative Risk Analysis is about making informed judgments to prioritize risks when detailed numerical data may not be available. It's a practical approach that helps teams focus their attention where it matters most.

When preparing for your PMI-PBA exam, practice applying qualitative analysis techniques to various scenarios to build your confidence in recognizing when and how this approach should be used.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-PBA - Risk Identification and Management Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In a software upgrade project, a risk is identified related to possible delivery delays due to dependencies on multiple vendors. What qualitative risk analysis technique can best assist in analyzing this risk?

Correct Answer: Cause and effects diagram

The best qualitative risk analysis technique for analyzing a risk related to delivery delays due to dependencies on multiple vendors in a software upgrade project is 'Cause and effects diagram'. This technique can help to visually outline the potential causes of a specific problem, in this case, the delivery delays. It can assist in identifying the dependencies and how they might impact the timeline. On the other hand, 'Relying on vendor's positive track record' is not a risk analysis technique. It's simply an assumption that can lead to overlooking potential issues. 'Assuming that delays will not occur' is not analyzing the risk, but ignoring it, which is a risky and unsound management strategy. Ignoring the dependencies is also not a viable solution because it might lead to unexpected issues and delays in the project.

Question 2

In a global IT infrastructure project, you've identified a risk of incompatibility between new and existing systems. Which qualitative risk analysis tool would be most effective for assessing this risk?

Correct Answer: Probability and Impact Matrix

The Probability and Impact Matrix is the most effective qualitative risk analysis tool for assessing the risk of incompatibility between new and existing systems in a global IT infrastructure project.

This tool allows project managers to evaluate risks based on their likelihood of occurrence and potential impact on project objectives. For the given scenario, it would help prioritize the incompatibility risk by considering both its probability and potential consequences.

The matrix provides a visual representation that helps stakeholders quickly understand the severity of the risk, facilitating decision-making on risk response strategies.

Other options are less suitable:

Risk Data Quality Assessment focuses on evaluating the quality and reliability of risk data, not on analyzing specific risks.

Expert Judgment and Historical Data Analysis are inputs to risk analysis rather than specific tools for qualitative risk assessment.

Risk Categorization and Urgency Assessment are components of risk analysis but do not provide a comprehensive view of both probability and impact like the Probability and Impact Matrix does.

Question 3

During qualitative risk analysis for a software development project, you identify a risk of data loss during system migration. Which technique would be most effective for assessing the potential impact of this risk?

Correct Answer: Risk probability and impact matrix

The most effective technique for assessing the potential impact of data loss during system migration in a qualitative risk analysis is the Risk probability and impact matrix. This technique is ideal because: 1. It allows for a comprehensive evaluation of both the likelihood of the risk occurring and its potential impact on the project. 2. It provides a visual representation of the risk severity, making it easier for stakeholders to understand and prioritize. 3. It helps in categorizing risks as high, medium, or low priority based on their position in the matrix. 4. It facilitates decision-making on which risks require immediate attention and response planning. The other options are less suitable for this specific scenario: The Delphi technique is more useful for gathering expert opinions on various aspects of risk but may not provide a clear assessment of impact. Risk urgency assessment focuses on the time sensitivity of risks, which is not the primary concern when evaluating the impact of data loss. Risk categorization based on project objectives is a broader approach and may not provide the specific impact assessment needed for this particular risk. The Risk probability and impact matrix is the most appropriate tool for assessing and communicating the potential impact of data loss during system migration in a qualitative risk analysis.

Go Premium

PMI Professional in Business Analysis Preparation Package (2025)

  • 3015 Superior-grade PMI Professional in Business Analysis practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-PBA preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Qualitative Risk Analysis questions
71 questions (total)
Start 71 question test