Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Solution Implementation

Correct Answer: Employ early stakeholder engagement and create a structured feedback loop for addressing concerns

The best strategy for managing stakeholder resistance to change is to employ early stakeholder engagement and create a structured feedback loop for addressing concerns. This approach is proactive and creates an environment of continuous communication and collaboration. This strategy works because it: - Identifies potential resistance early in the process - Builds trust and buy-in from the beginning - Provides a systematic way to address concerns - Allows for adaptive response to stakeholder needs - Creates a collaborative environment The other options are less effective because: - Simply documenting risks and waiting for feedback is too passive and reactive - Mandating attendance at meetings can create resentment and does not address underlying concerns - Requiring training completion before deployment is too late in the process and does not address resistance issues early enough Effective change management requires continuous engagement and open dialogue throughout the project lifecycle, making early stakeholder engagement with structured feedback the most comprehensive solution.

Correct Answer: Conducting phased data migration with parallel system operation

Conducting phased data migration with parallel system operation is the best risk mitigation technique for data integration issues because: 1. It allows for gradual transition while maintaining business continuity 2. Problems can be identified and resolved in smaller, manageable segments 3. The parallel operation provides a fallback mechanism if issues arise 4. It reduces the overall risk by breaking down the implementation into controlled phases Why other approaches are less effective: Multiple backup systems and redundant storage primarily address data loss, not integration issues. Running automated validation scripts during off-peak hours doesn't provide adequate risk mitigation during active business operations. Real-time synchronization with continuous monitoring, while useful, introduces more complexity and higher risk of system-wide issues if problems occur.

Correct Answer: Evaluate the risk impact on project objectives and develop alternative implementation approaches

The best approach when identifying a high-impact technical risk during final implementation is to evaluate the risk impact and develop alternative approaches. This allows for: 1. Proper assessment of the potential consequences on project objectives 2. Development of mitigation strategies 3. Consideration of alternative implementation paths 4. Balanced decision-making based on risk analysis The other options are less appropriate because: Simply documenting the risk and continuing with implementation could lead to serious project issues and doesn't address the high impact nature of the risk. Escalating to senior management and requesting more resources isn't the first step - proper evaluation should occur first to determine if escalation is necessary. Creating technical specifications and adding QA resources doesn't address the core issue of risk evaluation and mitigation planning, which should be the priority.