Back to Qualitative Risk Analysis

Risk Probability and Impact Assessment

5 minutes 5 Questions

Risk Probability and Impact Assessment is a fundamental concept in Qualitative Risk Analysis that involves evaluating each identified risk in terms of two key dimensions: the likelihood that the risk will occur (probability) and the effect it would have on project objectives if it does occur (impact). This assessment helps project teams to understand the significance of each risk and to prioritize them accordingly. To conduct this assessment, risks are individually examined and assigned probability and impact ratings, often using a predefined scale (e.g., very low, low, medium, high, very high). Probability refers to the chance of a risk event happening, while impact refers to the potential consequences on project scope, schedule, cost, or quality. These ratings can be qualitative (descriptive terms) or semi-quantitative (numerical values representing ranges). The combination of probability and impact ratings provides a risk score that helps in ranking risks. For example, a risk with a high probability and high impact would receive a high-risk score, indicating that it is a significant threat to the project and requires immediate attention. This assessment process often involves input from subject matter experts, team members, and stakeholders who have experience or knowledge relevant to the risks being evaluated. Their insights contribute to more accurate and reliable assessments. Documenting the results of the risk probability and impact assessment in the risk register is crucial. It ensures that all team members and stakeholders are aware of the risks and their potential effects on the project. This information is essential for planning appropriate risk responses and allocating resources effectively. Overall, Risk Probability and Impact Assessment enables project managers to make informed decisions about which risks need proactive management and which can be monitored over time. It is a critical step in the risk management process that supports the successful delivery of project objectives by identifying and prioritizing risks based on their potential to affect the project.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-RMP - Qualitative Risk Analysis Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

When estimating risk probabilities in a project with limited historical data, what is the most reliable approach to determine occurrence likelihood?

Correct Answer: Expert judgment combined with structured interviewing techniques

Expert judgment combined with structured interviewing techniques is the most reliable approach when dealing with limited historical data because: 1. It leverages the knowledge and experience of subject matter experts who have dealt with similar situations 2. Structured interviewing techniques ensure consistent and methodical data collection 3. It allows for qualitative insights that may not be captured in limited numerical data 4. The approach can incorporate multiple expert perspectives to reduce individual bias Why other approaches are less effective: - Statistical analysis across organizations requires extensive historical data, which is stated as limited in this scenario - Random sampling and Monte Carlo simulations need significant data points to generate meaningful results - Weighted averages from previous patterns also require substantial historical data to be reliable In situations with limited historical data, relying on expert judgment through structured methods provides the most practical and reliable way to assess risk probabilities.

Question 2

In risk probability and impact assessment, if you need to qualify indirect risks that could have cascading effects on project objectives, which technique would be most appropriate?

Correct Answer: Bow-tie analysis to map interconnected risk chains

Bow-tie analysis is the most appropriate technique for qualifying indirect risks with cascading effects because: 1. It specifically focuses on visualizing and analyzing interconnected risk chains and their relationships 2. It maps both causes and consequences in a clear visual format 3. It helps identify how one risk can trigger multiple secondary risks 4. It enables teams to see prevention and mitigation controls across the risk chain Why other options are less suitable: Monte Carlo simulation is better for quantitative analysis of known risks and their probabilistic outcomes, not for qualifying indirect risk relationships. Decision tree analysis focuses on sequential decision points and their outcomes, but doesn't effectively capture multiple interconnected risk relationships simultaneously. Root cause analysis with expert judgment is more focused on finding the origin of specific problems rather than mapping complex risk interconnections and their cascading effects.

Question 3

In a Risk Probability and Impact Assessment, what is the most effective way to account for stakeholder risk tolerance levels?

Correct Answer: By calibrating the impact scales based on stakeholder thresholds and preferences

Calibrating impact scales based on stakeholder thresholds and preferences is the most effective approach for Risk Probability and Impact Assessment because: 1. It acknowledges that different stakeholders have varying tolerance levels for different types of risks 2. It allows for customization of risk assessment to match specific project and organizational contexts 3. It enables more accurate and relevant risk evaluation aligned with stakeholder expectations The other options are incorrect because: Using standardized industry risk matrices regardless of stakeholder input fails to consider unique organizational contexts and specific stakeholder requirements. Implementing a fixed numerical scoring system based on historical data does not account for current stakeholder perspectives and changing risk tolerance levels. Calculating average risk tolerance creates an artificial middle ground that may not truly represent any stakeholder's actual risk tolerance, potentially leading to poor risk management decisions.

Go Premium

PMI Risk Management Professional Preparation Package (2024)

  • 3223 Superior-grade PMI Risk Management Professional practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-RMP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Risk Probability and Impact Assessment questions
12 questions (total)
Start 12 question test