Back to Quantitative Risk Analysis

Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)

5 minutes 5 Questions

Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a statistical tool used in project management that incorporates uncertainty by utilizing three different time estimates—optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic—to calculate an expected duration for activities and the overall project. This technique acknowledges the inherent uncertainty in project schedules and provides a more realistic assessment than using single-point estimates. In Quantitative Risk Analysis, PERT is particularly valuable because it allows analysts to model the variability in activity durations. By applying the PERT formula, which calculates the expected duration as (Optimistic + 4 × Most Likely + Pessimistic) divided by 6, project managers can obtain a weighted average that considers the most probable outcome but also accounts for potential variations. Using PERT, project managers can identify the critical path and assess the impact of risks on project timelines. It helps in estimating the probability of completing the project by a certain date, which is crucial for planning and managing stakeholder expectations. Additionally, PERT analysis produces variance and standard deviation for each activity, which are important for quantifying schedule risk and performing further statistical analysis. PERT facilitates better resource allocation, budgeting, and identification of potential bottlenecks. It provides a structured method to incorporate expert judgment and historical data into project scheduling. By considering the full range of possible outcomes, PERT enhances the accuracy of risk assessments and supports informed decision-making in project management. However, PERT requires careful estimation of the three time estimates and can be time-consuming for large projects with many activities. The accuracy of PERT results depends on the quality of the input data, making it essential for project teams to gather reliable information and involve experienced personnel in the estimation process.

Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide

Why PERT Analysis is Important in Risk Management

Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) analysis is a critical tool in project risk management for several reasons:

- It provides a systematic approach to estimate project durations when facing uncertainty
- It helps project managers account for variability in task completion times
- It offers more realistic schedule estimates than single-point estimations
- It supports better decision-making by considering best-case, most likely, and worst-case scenarios
- It's particularly valuable for complex projects with interdependent activities
- It's recognized by PMI as an essential quantitative risk analysis technique

What is PERT Analysis?

PERT analysis is a statistical tool used in project management to analyze and represent the tasks in a project. Developed in the 1950s by the U.S. Navy for the Polaris submarine missile program, PERT specifically focuses on time as the variable factor, helping to determine realistic project schedules when activity durations are uncertain.

Unlike deterministic models that use single-point estimates, PERT uses three time estimates for each activity:

- Optimistic time (O): Best-case scenario - the minimum time required
- Most likely time (M): Most realistic estimate - the expected time
- Pessimistic time (P): Worst-case scenario - the maximum time required

These three estimates are combined to calculate an expected duration using a weighted average formula, giving more weight to the most likely estimate.

How PERT Analysis Works

1. Formula and Calculation
The PERT formula for calculating expected time (E) is:

E = (O + 4M + P) ÷ 6

This weighted average gives four times the weight to the most likely estimate compared to the optimistic and pessimistic estimates.

2. Standard Deviation
PERT also calculates the standard deviation (σ) for each activity:

σ = (P - O) ÷ 6

This measures the uncertainty or variability in the activity duration.

3. Variance
The variance (V) is the square of the standard deviation:

V = [(P - O) ÷ 6]²

4. Probability Calculations
Using standard deviation, project managers can calculate the probability of completing the project within a specific timeframe using normal distribution properties.

Example of PERT Calculation

For an activity with the following estimates:
- Optimistic (O): 4 days
- Most Likely (M): 6 days
- Pessimistic (P): 10 days

Expected duration (E) = (4 + 4×6 + 10) ÷ 6 = 38 ÷ 6 = 6.33 days
Standard deviation (σ) = (10 - 4) ÷ 6 = 1 day
Variance (V) = 1² = 1

Advantages of PERT Analysis

- Accounts for uncertainty in project scheduling
- Provides a range of possible outcomes rather than a single estimate
- Enables probability-based decision making
- Helps identify activities with high variability that may need risk responses
- Creates more realistic project schedules

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on PERT

Terminology and Formulas
- Memorize the PERT formula: E = (O + 4M + P) ÷ 6
- Know how to calculate standard deviation: σ = (P - O) ÷ 6
- Understand that variance equals standard deviation squared

Calculation Practice
- Practice calculating expected durations with various time estimates
- Learn to add variances along the critical path (they are additive)
- Be comfortable using the standard normal distribution table for probability questions

Common Question Types

1. Basic PERT calculations: Given O, M, and P values, calculate the expected duration

2. Standard deviation questions: Calculate the standard deviation for activities or entire projects

3. Probability questions: Determine the likelihood of completing a project by a certain date
Example: "What is the probability of completing the project in 20 days if the expected duration is 22 days with a standard deviation of 2 days?"
4. Comparative questions: Compare PERT with other estimation techniques like CPM (Critical Path Method)

5. Application questions: Decide when PERT is appropriate versus other methods

Key Points to Remember for Exams

- PERT uses weighted averages that emphasize the most likely scenario
- The larger the difference between pessimistic and optimistic times, the greater the uncertainty
- For the entire project, only add variances along the critical path
- The central limit theorem applies: as more activities are added, the distribution becomes more normal
- PERT assumes a beta distribution for individual activities and normal distribution for the overall project
- Z-scores can be used to calculate probabilities (Z = (Target date - Expected date) ÷ Project standard deviation)

Practical Application Tips

- Connect PERT analysis to other risk management processes
- Understand how to use PERT results to inform risk responses
- Know when PERT is most beneficial (projects with significant uncertainty)
- Recognize PERT limitations, such as subjective estimates and the assumption of statistical independence

By thoroughly understanding PERT analysis and practicing with example problems, you'll be well-prepared to answer exam questions on this important quantitative risk analysis technique.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-RMP - Quantitative Risk Analysis Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In PERT Analysis, what is the significance of the difference between the pessimistic and optimistic time estimates?

Correct Answer: It indicates the level of uncertainty in the task duration

The correct answer is that the difference between the pessimistic and optimistic time estimates indicates the level of uncertainty in the task duration. In PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) Analysis, three time estimates are used for each activity: 1. Optimistic time (O): The shortest possible time to complete the task 2. Pessimistic time (P): The longest possible time to complete the task 3. Most likely time (M): The most probable time to complete the task The difference between the pessimistic and optimistic time estimates represents the range of possible durations for a task. A larger difference indicates a higher level of uncertainty, while a smaller difference suggests more certainty in the task duration. This information is crucial for project managers to assess risks, plan for contingencies, and make informed decisions about resource allocation and scheduling. The other options are incorrect: - Determining the critical path is done using the calculated expected durations, not the difference between pessimistic and optimistic estimates. - Total float is calculated based on early and late start/finish dates, not directly from the time estimates. - Resource allocation is determined by the nature of the task and its requirements, not by the difference in time estimates.

Question 2

Question: Angela is managing a construction project. To calculate the expected time for tasks, she only considers the most optimistic time. Is this a correct approach to PERT Analysis?

Correct Answer: No, in PERT Analysis, expected time is calculated by taking the weighted average of the most optimistic, most likely, and most pessimistic times.

PERT Analysis, which stands for Project Evaluation and Review Technique, is a statistical tool used in project management for scheduling and organizing tasks within a project. To calculate the expected time for tasks, PERT uses a weighted average of the most optimistic (minimum), most likely (normal), and most pessimistic (maximum) times, not just the most optimistic time. This approach provides a more accurate estimate, taking into account the inherent uncertainties in estimating the time required to complete tasks within a project. Therefore, Angela's approach of considering only the most optimistic time is incorrect. The other answers which suggest considering only the optimistic time or a combination of optimistic and pessimistic times are also incorrect, as they omit the crucial element of the most likely time in calculations.

Question 3

Nick is analyzing the variance for each activity in his project management process. For task V, optimistic time is 5 days, most likely time is 7 days, and pessimistic time is 14 days. What will be the variance for this task in PERT Analysis?

Correct Answer: 2.25

In PERT Analysis, variance is calculated using the formula ((pessimistic time - optimistic time)/6)^2, where optimistic time is the best-case scenario time, most likely time is the estimated normal time, and pessimistic time is the worst-case scenario time. In this case, the optimistic time is 5 days, the most likely time is 7 days and the pessimistic time is 14 days. Therefore, the formula to calculate variance becomes ((14 - 5)/6)^2, which equals 2.25. The other answer options are not correct because they do not compute using the formula.

Go Premium

PMI Risk Management Professional Preparation Package (2025)

  • 3223 Superior-grade PMI Risk Management Professional practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-RMP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) questions
21 questions (total)
Start 21 question test