Optimism Bias

Correct Answer: Using reference class forecasting and structured risk analysis workshops

Reference class forecasting and structured risk analysis workshops is the best strategy to address optimism bias because: 1. It uses actual historical data from similar projects (reference class) to validate risk assessments 2. It provides objective, data-driven comparisons rather than relying on subjective opinions 3. Structured workshops promote systematic analysis and group discussion of risks 4. This combination helps overcome cognitive biases by comparing current assessments with documented past experiences Why other approaches are inadequate: - Team consensus and personal experience still perpetuate existing biases and subjective views - Training on positive thinking would actually worsen optimism bias rather than address it - Expert judgment and intuition alone can still be subject to the same optimism bias The key is using objective historical data through reference class forecasting to challenge and correct overly optimistic assessments, combined with structured analysis to ensure thorough risk evaluation.

Correct Answer: Optimism Bias

Optimism Bias is the most accurate explanation for this behavior because: 1. It specifically describes people's tendency to overestimate the probability of positive events and underestimate the probability of negative events. 2. In this case, stakeholders are consistently underestimating the likelihood of schedule delays (negative events) despite contradicting historical data. 3. This is a classic manifestation of optimism bias in project management, where teams believe their project will perform better than past statistics indicate. Why other answers are incorrect: Representativeness Bias refers to making judgments based on stereotypes or similar situations, which isn't the main issue here. Anchoring Bias involves relying too heavily on the first piece of information received, which doesn't explain the consistent underestimation pattern. Availability Heuristic relates to making decisions based on easily recalled information, which doesn't explain why stakeholders would consistently assign lower probabilities despite available historical data.

Correct Answer: Apply reference class forecasting using data from similar past projects

Reference class forecasting is specifically designed to address and mitigate optimism bias in project estimations. This method uses actual outcomes from similar past projects as a baseline for future projections, which helps overcome the natural tendency to underestimate costs. Here's why this is the best solution: - It provides an empirical, data-driven approach rather than relying on subjective assessments - It uses actual historical results rather than theoretical estimates - It specifically addresses the psychological aspect of optimism bias Why other options are less effective: - A comprehensive cost estimation framework, while valuable, doesn't specifically address the psychological bias in the estimations - Regular team meetings to review estimates might reinforce existing biases if the same team continues to undervalue costs - External consultants provide independent validation but may not address the root cause of systematic optimism bias in the team's estimations Reference class forecasting has been proven particularly effective in addressing psychological biases in project management, as it relies on actual completed project data rather than subjective estimations.