Risk Audits vs. Risk Reviews: Understanding the Differences
5 minutes
5 Questions
While both risk audits and risk reviews are integral components of effective risk management in project management, they serve different purposes and involve distinct processes. Understanding the differences between the two is crucial for project managers aiming to implement comprehensive risk mana…While both risk audits and risk reviews are integral components of effective risk management in project management, they serve different purposes and involve distinct processes. Understanding the differences between the two is crucial for project managers aiming to implement comprehensive risk management practices.
Risk audits are formal, systematic examinations of the entire risk management process. They focus on evaluating the effectiveness of risk planning, identification, analysis, response planning, and monitoring activities. The purpose of a risk audit is to determine whether the risk management processes are being followed as planned and whether they are delivering the expected results. Audits often involve formal methodologies and may include external auditors or stakeholders to provide an objective assessment. The findings from risk audits are used to improve the risk management process and ensure compliance with organizational policies and procedures.
On the other hand, risk reviews are ongoing assessments that focus on the content of the risks themselves rather than the process. They involve re-examining existing risks, identifying new risks, and evaluating the effectiveness of risk responses. Risk reviews ensure that the project team stays aware of the current risk environment and can adjust their strategies accordingly. They are typically less formal than audits and are conducted regularly throughout the project lifecycle.
In summary, the primary difference lies in their focus and frequency. Risk audits are concerned with the efficacy and compliance of the risk management process and are usually conducted less frequently, perhaps at key project milestones. Risk reviews are focused on the actual risks affecting the project and are conducted more frequently to ensure ongoing risk monitoring and response.
Understanding these differences allows project managers to effectively schedule and utilize both activities. Employing both risk audits and risk reviews ensures that not only is the project team aware of and responding to risks appropriately, but also that the processes in place to manage risks are functioning effectively and can be improved upon when necessary.
Risk Audits vs. Risk Reviews: Understanding the Differences
Why Understanding Risk Audits vs. Risk Reviews is Important
Distinguishing between risk audits and risk reviews is crucial for project management professionals, especially those pursuing the PMI-RMP certification. These concepts represent different approaches to risk evaluation that serve distinct purposes in the risk management process. Confusing these terms on your exam can lead to incorrect answers, so a clear understanding of their differences is essential for exam success.
What Are Risk Audits?
Risk audits are formal, structured examinations that evaluate the effectiveness of risk management processes against established standards or methodologies. They are typically conducted by independent parties (internal or external auditors) who were not involved in the project's risk management activities.
Key characteristics of risk audits include:
- Compliance focus: Assess if risk management activities comply with organizational policies and procedures - Independent evaluation: Conducted by parties not directly involved in the project - Structured approach: Follow formal audit methodologies and procedures - Documentation-heavy: Require substantial evidence and documentation - Formal reporting: Result in formal audit findings and recommendations
What Are Risk Reviews?
Risk reviews are periodic assessments conducted by the project team to evaluate the status of identified risks, discover new risks, and assess the effectiveness of risk responses. They are typically less formal than audits and focus more on the current risk profile of the project.
Key characteristics of risk reviews include:
- Status focus: Examine the current state of project risks - Team-based activity: Usually conducted by the project team - Flexible approach: Can be tailored to project needs - Forward-looking: Identify emerging risks and reassess existing ones - Action-oriented: Focus on necessary adjustments to risk responses
Key Differences Between Risk Audits and Risk Reviews
1. Purpose: - Audits: Evaluate compliance with risk management processes - Reviews: Assess the status of project risks and response effectiveness
2. Who Conducts Them: - Audits: Independent auditors - Reviews: Project team members
3. Frequency: - Audits: Less frequent, often at major project milestones or annually - Reviews: More frequent, often as part of regular project meetings
4. Formality: - Audits: Highly formal with structured methodologies - Reviews: Less formal and more adaptable
5. Outputs: - Audits: Formal findings, recommendations, and corrective actions - Reviews: Updated risk register, new risk responses, and action items
How Risk Audits Work
1. Planning Phase: - Define audit scope, objectives, and criteria - Select audit team and establish audit schedule - Develop audit procedures and checklists
2. Execution Phase: - Review risk management documentation - Interview key stakeholders - Test risk management processes - Gather evidence of compliance or non-compliance
3. Reporting Phase: - Document findings and observations - Develop recommendations for improvement - Present results to key stakeholders
4. Follow-up Phase: - Monitor implementation of recommended actions - Verify effectiveness of implemented changes
How Risk Reviews Work
1. Preparation: - Schedule regular review meetings - Gather current risk register and risk data - Involve appropriate team members and stakeholders
2. Review Process: - Evaluate status of identified risks - Assess effectiveness of implemented risk responses - Identify new or emerging risks - Reassess risk priorities and impacts
3. Update and Action: - Update risk register with new information - Modify risk response strategies as needed - Assign action items and responsibilities
4. Communication: - Share review results with stakeholders - Incorporate findings into project communications
Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Risk Audits vs. Risk Reviews
1. Pay attention to keywords: - Terms like "compliance," "independent," and "formal findings" suggest risk audits - Terms like "status update," "team assessment," and "emerging risks" suggest risk reviews
2. Consider who is involved: - If the question mentions auditors or independent parties, it's likely about risk audits - If it mentions the project team conducting the activity, it's likely about risk reviews
3. Think about timing and frequency: - Regular, frequent activities during the project are typically risk reviews - Less frequent, milestone-based evaluations are more likely risk audits
4. Focus on the purpose: - If the purpose is to check compliance with processes, it's an audit - If the purpose is to update risk status and responses, it's a review
5. Watch for output descriptions: - Formal findings and compliance reports indicate audits - Updated risk registers and new response plans indicate reviews
6. Remember context matters: - Consider the project phase and scenario presented - Think about what would make sense at that point in the project
8. Careful with closely related activities: - Risk reassessment is part of risk reviews, not audits - Process improvement recommendations can come from both, but are more formal in audits
By understanding these key differences and recognizing the contextual clues in exam questions, you'll be well-equipped to correctly identify and answer questions related to risk audits and risk reviews on your PMI-RMP exam.