Qualitative Risk Analysis Process

Correct Answer: During periodic risk review meetings with the team

Risk urgency assessment should be done during periodic risk review meetings with the team because: Risk review meetings are the ideal time to: - Evaluate current risk status - Assess time sensitivity of risks - Update risk information in real-time - Get input from all team members - Make timely decisions on risk responses The other options are incorrect because: - Waiting for quantitative analysis completion would delay urgent risk responses - Requiring comprehensive stakeholder approval would create unnecessary delays in risk management - Waiting until project deliverables are complete would make risk management ineffective as risks need to be managed throughout the project lifecycle Periodic risk review meetings ensure that risk information stays current and allows for timely updates to the risk register, making it the most appropriate time for updating risk urgency assessments.

Correct Answer: Multi-criteria risk scoring workshops with stakeholders

Multi-criteria risk scoring workshops with stakeholders is the most effective technique for capturing stakeholder risk perceptions and attitudes because: 1. It provides a collaborative environment where multiple stakeholders can share their views simultaneously 2. It allows for real-time discussion and consensus building 3. It captures both qualitative insights and structured scoring 4. It promotes stakeholder engagement and buy-in The other options are less effective because: Historical data and statistical models focus on past events rather than current stakeholder perceptions. Individual interviews with Monte Carlo simulation mix qualitative and quantitative methods inappropriately for perception assessment. Probabilistic modeling based on expert systems is too technical and removes the human element needed for understanding perceptions and attitudes.

Correct Answer: Project success criteria and stakeholder risk thresholds

Project success criteria and stakeholder risk thresholds are the key inputs that help determine risk impact levels during qualitative risk analysis. This is correct because: 1. Stakeholder risk thresholds define the acceptable levels of risk exposure for the project 2. Success criteria establish the parameters against which impacts can be measured 3. Together, they provide the framework for evaluating how severe a risk's impact would be on project objectives The other options are incorrect because: - Project budget estimates and resource allocation are more relevant to cost management and resource planning than risk impact assessment - Project scope statement and organizational process documents are inputs to risk identification, but not primary determinants of impact levels - WBS and schedule network diagrams are planning tools that help identify risks but don't determine their impact levels Stakeholder risk thresholds specifically define the boundaries of acceptable risk exposure, making them essential for determining impact levels in qualitative analysis.