Back to Identifying Stakeholders

Stakeholder Analysis

5 minutes 5 Questions

Stakeholder Analysis is a critical process in project management that involves identifying all individuals, groups, or organizations that can affect or be affected by a project, and analyzing their interests, influence, and potential impact on project success. The goal is to develop a strategic approach to engaging stakeholders in a way that aligns with the project's objectives. In the context of a PMI Scheduling Professional course, stakeholder analysis is essential for creating realistic and achievable project schedules. By understanding the needs and expectations of stakeholders, scheduling professionals can anticipate potential challenges and incorporate appropriate contingencies into the schedule. This process typically involves several steps: 1. **Identification of Stakeholders**: Listing all potential stakeholders, including project sponsors, team members, end-users, suppliers, and regulatory bodies. 2. **Assessment of Stakeholder Interests and Influence**: Evaluating each stakeholder's level of interest in the project and their ability to influence the project's outcome, which helps prioritize stakeholder engagement efforts. 3. **Determination of Stakeholder Expectations**: Understanding what each stakeholder expects from the project, which can impact scheduling priorities and resource allocation. 4. **Development of Stakeholder Engagement Strategies**: Crafting tailored approaches for communication and involvement to ensure stakeholder needs are met and potential conflicts are mitigated. Effective stakeholder analysis enables scheduling professionals to proactively manage stakeholder expectations, secure necessary support, and navigate the complex web of stakeholder relationships. It contributes to more accurate scheduling, risk identification, and resource planning, ultimately enhancing the likelihood of project success.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-SP - Identifying Stakeholders Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In stakeholder analysis, which quantitative metric best measures a stakeholder's ability to bridge communication gaps between different project groups?

Correct Answer: Betweenness centrality score

Betweenness centrality score is the most appropriate quantitative metric for measuring a stakeholder's ability to bridge communication gaps between project groups. Here's why: Betweenness centrality specifically measures how often a node (stakeholder) acts as a bridge along the shortest path between two other nodes in the network. This metric: - Quantifies the stakeholder's role in information flow - Measures their position as an intermediary - Identifies key communication brokers in the network The other options are less suitable because: Organizational hierarchy position is a qualitative measure that may not reflect actual communication patterns or effectiveness. Network density ratio with engagement levels measures overall network connectivity but not individual bridging capacity. Formal authority index focuses on power relationships rather than communication facilitation capabilities.

Question 2

In a stakeholder analysis using the Power-Legitimacy-Urgency (PLU) Salience Model, what type of stakeholder would possess all three attributes?

Correct Answer: Definitive Stakeholder

In the Power-Legitimacy-Urgency (PLU) Salience Model, a Definitive Stakeholder is the only classification that possesses all three attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. This makes them the most significant stakeholders in the model. A Definitive Stakeholder requires immediate attention due to their urgency, has the power to influence decisions, and has legitimate claims or relationships with the project. The other options are incorrect because: - A Dominant Stakeholder typically only has power and legitimacy, but lacks urgency - A Primary Stakeholder is not a classification in the PLU model - A Critical Stakeholder is not a formal classification in the PLU model The PLU model specifically uses combinations of these three attributes to classify stakeholders, and only Definitive Stakeholders possess all three attributes simultaneously.

Question 3

In stakeholder analysis, which level of measurement best captures a stakeholder's actual decision-making capacity versus their formal organizational position?

Correct Answer: Behavioral Power Index

The Behavioral Power Index is the best measure for capturing a stakeholder's actual decision-making capacity versus their formal position because: It focuses on observed behaviors and real influence patterns rather than formal titles or positions. It measures how stakeholders actually exercise power and make decisions in practice. It accounts for informal authority networks and practical decision-making capabilities. The other options are less suitable because: Stakeholder Authority Level Assessment typically focuses more on formal organizational authority rather than actual influence. Organizational Influence Matrix Score tends to be more focused on structural relationships and reporting lines rather than actual decision-making behavior. Hierarchical Position Analysis System primarily measures formal organizational positions and ranks, which may not reflect true decision-making capacity.

Go Premium

PMI Scheduling Professional Preparation Package (2024)

  • 3429 Superior-grade PMI Scheduling Professional practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-SP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Stakeholder Analysis questions
130 questions (total)
Start 100 question test