Back to Schedule Risk Analysis and Mitigation

Schedule Contingency Reserves

5 minutes 5 Questions

Schedule Contingency Reserves are time buffers added to the project schedule to account for uncertainties and identified risks that might affect the timeline. They provide a cushion against schedule overruns by allocating additional time to activities or milestones subject to risks. Developed based on risk analysis, contingency reserves increase the project’s resilience to unforeseen delays. In Schedule Risk Analysis, risks are identified, and their potential impacts on activity durations are assessed. Quantifying these risks helps project managers determine the appropriate amount of contingency time to allocate, setting more realistic schedules and managing stakeholder expectations. Contingency reserves should be clearly identified in the project schedule and managed under change control processes. They are specifically tied to identified risks, not a general buffer for poor planning. Proper management involves monitoring reserve consumption and updating risk assessments as the project progresses. Using Schedule Contingency Reserves is a proactive risk mitigation strategy that helps ensure minor delays or issues do not derail the entire project schedule. It enhances the flexibility of the project plan, enabling the team to handle uncertainties without significant disruptions, contributing to overall project success.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-SP - Schedule Risk Analysis and Mitigation Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

What is the primary purpose of Schedule Contingency Reserve in project management?

Correct Answer: To address potential schedule risks and uncertainties based on quantitative analysis

The primary purpose of Schedule Contingency Reserve is to address potential risks and uncertainties in project schedules based on quantitative analysis. This is essential because it provides a calculated buffer specifically for identified schedule risks and known unknowns, determined through proper risk analysis techniques. The other options are incorrect because: Allocating additional resources and funding for all activities is a cost management approach, not specifically a schedule contingency measure. Compensating for scope changes is handled through change control processes, not schedule contingency reserve. Adding buffer time to each activity in the critical path is padding, which differs from a properly calculated contingency reserve based on risk analysis.

Question 2

In managing Schedule Contingency Reserve, which of the following represents the best practice for its allocation?

Correct Answer: Apply it to specific high-risk activities in the schedule based on quantitative risk analysis

The best practice for allocating Schedule Contingency Reserve is to apply it to specific high-risk activities based on quantitative risk analysis. This approach is optimal because: - It aligns contingency with actual identified risks - It uses data-driven analysis to determine allocation - It ensures resources are available where they're most needed - It follows proper risk management principles Why other approaches are suboptimal: Distributing evenly across all activities is inefficient as not all activities carry the same level of risk. Adding buffers at the end of each phase can lead to student syndrome and doesn't address risks when they actually occur in the schedule. Applying contingency proportionally based on duration fails to consider actual risk levels and may misallocate resources to low-risk activities simply because they take longer.

Question 3

Which statement best describes when Schedule Contingency Reserve should be reduced during project execution?

Correct Answer: When identified schedule risks have been eliminated or their probability has decreased significantly

Schedule Contingency Reserve should be reduced when the original risks that necessitated the reserve have been eliminated or their probability has significantly decreased. This is the most logical and risk-focused approach because: Contingency reserves are specifically allocated to manage identified risks. When these risks are no longer present or have reduced probability, maintaining the same level of contingency would be unnecessary. Other answers are incorrect because: SPI improvement alone doesn't justify reducing contingency as risks may still exist despite good performance. Critical path activities finishing early don't necessarily mean the project's risks have been mitigated. Stakeholder requests for schedule compression should not influence contingency reserves, as these reserves are meant for risk management, not schedule acceleration.

Go Premium

PMI Scheduling Professional Preparation Package (2024)

  • 3429 Superior-grade PMI Scheduling Professional practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-SP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Schedule Contingency Reserves questions
12 questions (total)
Start 12 question test