Back to Schedule Risk Analysis and Mitigation

Three-Point Estimating and PERT Analysis in Schedule Risk

5 minutes 5 Questions

Three-Point Estimating and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Analysis are critical tools in Schedule Risk Analysis, providing a more realistic estimation by considering uncertainty and variability in activity durations. Traditional single-point estimates often fail to account for the inherent risks and uncertainties in project schedules. Three-Point Estimating enhances this by utilizing optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely duration estimates for each activity. In Three-Point Estimating, the optimistic estimate (O) represents the best-case scenario where everything proceeds as planned without any delays. The pessimistic estimate (P) considers the worst-case scenario with potential delays or issues. The most likely estimate (M) is the most probable duration considering normal delays and problems. By calculating the expected activity duration using a weighted average, project managers can derive a more realistic estimate. The PERT formula commonly used is: (O + 4M + P) / 6. This approach acknowledges that activity durations are not certain and that there is a probability distribution of possible outcomes. Incorporating Three-Point Estimating into schedule planning allows for a quantification of schedule risks and uncertainties. It enables project managers to perform statistical analysis on the potential variance in the schedule and to understand the probability of meeting project deadlines. Moreover, PERT Analysis goes beyond just calculating expected durations; it helps in determining the probability of completing the project within a certain timeframe. By analyzing the standard deviation and variance of activities, project managers can construct confidence intervals and assess the likelihood of project completion dates. This probabilistic approach provides valuable insights for risk management and decision-making. Implementing Three-Point Estimating and PERT Analysis enhances the robustness of schedule risk analysis by providing a structured methodology to incorporate uncertainty into project schedules. It supports proactive risk management by enabling early identification of schedule risks and the development of mitigation strategies to address potential delays.

Three-Point Estimating and PERT Analysis in Schedule Risk Management

Understanding Three-Point Estimating and PERT Analysis in Schedule Risk

Three-Point Estimating and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) are essential tools in project schedule risk management that help project managers create more realistic time estimates by accounting for uncertainty.

Why It's Important

In project management, especially when preparing for the PMI-SP certification, understanding these techniques is crucial because:

- They provide more realistic schedule estimates than single-point estimates
- They acknowledge the inherent uncertainty in project activities
- They help quantify schedule risks
- They form the foundation for more advanced schedule risk analysis techniques
- They are frequently tested on PMI-SP exams

What Is Three-Point Estimating?

Three-Point Estimating is a technique that uses three different time estimates for each project activity:

1. Optimistic estimate (O): The best-case scenario - how quickly an activity could be completed if everything goes perfectly

2. Most Likely estimate (M): The realistic scenario - how long the activity will probably take under normal conditions

3. Pessimistic estimate (P): The worst-case scenario - how long the activity might take if significant problems occur

How PERT Analysis Works

PERT uses the three-point estimates to calculate:

1. Expected Duration (E) using the formula:

E = (O + 4M + P) ÷ 6

This weighted average gives more influence to the most likely estimate.

2. Standard Deviation (SD) for each activity:

SD = (P - O) ÷ 6

3. Variance (V) for each activity:

V = SD²

4. For the entire project path, the total variance is the sum of individual activity variances along the critical path.

5. The project standard deviation is the square root of the total variance.

Practical Application

When applying these techniques:

1. Gather expert judgment to determine the three estimates for each activity
2. Calculate expected durations using the PERT formula
3. Develop the schedule using these expected durations
4. Calculate standard deviations and variances to understand the level of uncertainty
5. Use these values to determine confidence levels for project completion dates

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Three-Point Estimating and PERT Analysis

1. Memorize the formulas: Know how to calculate expected duration, standard deviation, and variance.

2. Practice calculations: Exam questions often require quick calculations using these formulas.

3. Understand confidence intervals: Know that:
- 68% confidence = Expected Duration ± 1 SD
- 95% confidence = Expected Duration ± 2 SD
- 99.7% confidence = Expected Duration ± 3 SD

4. Remember key differences:
- Triangular Distribution: E = (O + M + P) ÷ 3
- PERT/Beta Distribution: E = (O + 4M + P) ÷ 6

5. Focus on critical path: In exam scenarios, pay attention to which activities are on the critical path when calculating project-level statistics.

6. Watch for trick questions: Ensure you're using the correct formula based on what's being asked.

7. Apply concepts to scenarios: Be prepared to recommend appropriate actions based on PERT analysis results.

8. Know related terms: Understand how these techniques relate to schedule compression, Monte Carlo simulation, and other schedule risk techniques.

By mastering these techniques and following these exam tips, you'll be well-prepared to handle Three-Point Estimating and PERT Analysis questions on the PMI-SP exam.

Test mode:
Start practice test
PMI-SP - Schedule Risk Analysis and Mitigation Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)

Question 1

In a Three-Point PERT estimation scenario, what effect would decreasing the pessimistic estimate while keeping optimistic and most likely estimates constant have on the overall risk assessment?

Correct Answer: It reduces the overall variance and indicates lower schedule uncertainty

In PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) estimation, when the pessimistic estimate is decreased while keeping optimistic and most likely estimates constant: The overall variance decreases because: 1. Variance in PERT is calculated using (P-O)²/36 2. When P (pessimistic) value decreases, the difference between P and O (optimistic) becomes smaller 3. This smaller range results in reduced variance 4. Lower variance indicates reduced uncertainty in the schedule Why other answers are incorrect: - Standard deviation would decrease, not increase, as it's the square root of variance - No need to recalculate optimistic estimate as PERT allows independent values - Decreasing pessimistic estimate actually reduces risk exposure and probability of overruns by narrowing the range of possible outcomes

Question 2

In PERT analysis, how is the weighted average duration calculated when the most likely estimate appears to be closer to the pessimistic estimate?

Correct Answer: Apply the standard PERT formula with (O + 4M + P)/6, as the formula remains constant regardless of estimate distributions

In PERT analysis, the standard formula (O + 4M + P)/6 is the correct and proven method for calculating weighted average duration, regardless of where the most likely estimate falls between optimistic and pessimistic values. This formula is based on beta distribution statistics and has been mathematically proven to provide the most accurate results. The '4' multiplier for the most likely estimate (M) ensures proper weighting of the central tendency, while the single counts of optimistic (O) and pessimistic (P) values provide balanced consideration of the extremes. Modifying this formula based on perceived closeness to either extreme would introduce bias and reduce the statistical validity of the PERT estimation. The standard formula already accounts for variations in distribution through its weighting system. The other proposed formulas would skew the results inappropriately and do not align with established PERT methodology. Changing the weightings would invalidate the statistical basis of the PERT calculation and potentially lead to inaccurate project estimates.

Question 3

When analyzing schedule risk using PERT, which formula correctly represents the standard deviation of an activity duration?

Correct Answer: (Pessimistic - Optimistic) / 6

In PERT analysis, the standard deviation (σ) of an activity duration is calculated using the formula: (Pessimistic - Optimistic) / 6. This formula is based on statistical principles where the range (difference between pessimistic and optimistic estimates) is divided by 6 because: 1. In a normal distribution, approximately 99.73% of all values fall within ±3 standard deviations of the mean 2. The total range (Pessimistic - Optimistic) represents 6 standard deviations The other formulas are incorrect because: - The formula with (P + 4M + O) / 6 is actually for calculating Expected Value (mean) - Multiplying by Most Likely or dividing by Most Likely would skew the standard deviation calculation inappropriately This standard deviation calculation is crucial for understanding the uncertainty and variability in activity durations, which helps in risk analysis and schedule management.

Go Premium

PMI Scheduling Professional Preparation Package (2025)

  • 3429 Superior-grade PMI Scheduling Professional practice questions.
  • Accelerated Mastery: Deep dive into critical topics to fast-track your mastery.
  • Unlock Effortless PMI-SP preparation: 5 full exams.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund with no questions if unsatisfied.
  • Bonus: If you upgrade now you get upgraded access to all courses
  • Risk-Free Decision: Start with a 7-day free trial - get premium features at no cost!
More Three-Point Estimating and PERT Analysis in Schedule Risk questions
12 questions (total)
Start 12 question test