Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Correct Answer: Add integration milestones at key points in the WBS

The most effective way to address the lack of clear integration points between different modules in a WBS is to add integration milestones at key points in the WBS. This approach is best because:

1. It provides clear checkpoints for integration activities throughout the project timeline.
2. It ensures that integration is considered at crucial stages of development.
3. It maintains the existing WBS structure while enhancing it with integration points.
4. It allows for better tracking and management of integration activities.

The other options are less effective:

Reorganizing the WBS to group all integration-related tasks together may disrupt the logical flow of the project and separate integration from the modules it affects.

Creating a separate WBS exclusively for integration activities could lead to disconnection between the main project tasks and integration efforts, potentially causing coordination issues.

Expanding each module in the WBS to include detailed integration steps might overcomplicate the WBS and make it difficult to manage. It could also lead to redundancy in integration tasks across multiple modules.

Adding integration milestones strikes the right balance between highlighting integration points and maintaining a clear, manageable WBS structure.

Correct Answer: Restructure the WBS to make the most of parallel tasks and shorten the critical path

The correct answer is 'Restructure the WBS to make the most of parallel tasks and shorten the critical path'. In project management, the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a significant tool that breaks down the project into smaller, manageable units. If the critical path defined in the WBS is much longer than the project schedule allows, it might result in project failure. Therefore, the project manager should look into restructuring the WBS such that tasks can be performed in parallel, which can significantly shorten the duration of the critical path. The other answers are incorrect for the following reasons: 'Proceed with the project as planned and hope to catch up later' is risky and doesn't address the underlying issue that the project timeline is too long. Simply 'Adding more resources to shorten the time frame' may not always be the right approach as it can lead to increased costs without guaranteeing a proportionate reduction in the project timeline. 'Eliminating a few tasks on the critical path' is not a valid option considering that all tasks on the critical path are necessary for project completion.

Correct Answer: Allow for task dependencies in the WBS and ensure proper communication between the teams.

When faced with interdependent tasks across multiple teams, the best approach is to allow for task dependencies in the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and ensure proper communication between the teams. This will help in identifying the relationships and dependencies between tasks, and enable effective coordination and collaboration among the teams involved. Creating separate WBS for interdependent tasks or allocating them to a single team would not address the issue effectively, as it may lead to siloed work and hinder overall project progress. Ignoring the dependencies altogether would lead to unrealistic planning and potential delays in the project. By incorporating task dependencies in the WBS and fostering communication, the project manager can ensure that all teams are aware of the interrelated tasks, can plan their work accordingly, and can work together to complete the project successfully.