Create Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Correct Answer: Utilize the previous WBS as a template but ensure customizing it for the current project

The best course of action in this scenario would be to use the previous WBS as a template, but also ensure it is customized to suit the requirements and specifics of the current project. This is because while it is useful to leverage existing plans such as the WBS from previous projects, every project is unique and has its own unique elements that must be considered. Therefore, while using the previous WBS as a starting point can save time and effort, it shouldn't be copied word for word. Instead, it should be modified according to the new project's needsAs for the other answers:1. Rejecting the proposal and starting a new WBS from scratch: While it's true that every project is unique, it's also true that there can be similarities in projects, especially if they fall under the same domain or type. Therefore, using a previous WBS can give a good starting point and can save much time and effort that would otherwise be spent in creating the WBS from scratch2. Accepting the proposal without any modifications: This would not be the best course of action because, as stated earlier, every project is unique and has its own unique specifics and needs to be considered. Simply copying the WBS from a previous project might overlook some of the unique elements of this project, leading to potential problems down the line3. Using the previous WBS but updating it after project completion: This also would not be the best action. The purpose of the WBS is to guide the project work, so updating it after the project is completed really defeats the purpose. The WBS should be updated and customized to the current project before the project work begins, not after it ends.

Correct Answer: Poor formulation of the WBS leading to planning and execution issues

The best answer is 'Poor formulation of the WBS leading to planning and execution issues'. The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a key project deliverable that organizes the team's work into manageable sections. If the team does not understand their role in the WBS development, it can lead to poor formulation of WBS. This in turn can result in planning and execution issues, as work not properly defined can lead to gaps in task assignments, unclear responsibilities and subsequently project delays. Let's go through other options - The 'Overestimation of each work package duration' is not a direct consequence of the team not understanding their role in the WBS development. It could happen due to several reasons such as lack of experience, poor estimation techniques etc. The 'Minimal impact on the project plan' is not correct, as poor understanding of WBS roles directly impact the project planning and can cause serious execution errors. The 'Poor team morale' might be a side-effect of many project issues but it generally doesn't directly link with understanding team's role in WBS development.

Correct Answer: Decomposition

Decomposition is the best answer. In project management, decomposition is the process of breaking down the project work into manageable tasks. It plays a significant role in creating a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), which is essentially a roadmap for the project that breaks the project's objectives into definable, manageable tasks with specifiable deadlines. PERT, Gantt Chart and Resource Leveling are also important for project management, but they are tools to schedule and monitor project progress rather than to create a WBS. PERT stands for 'Program Evaluation Review Technique' and is used to analyze the tasks involved in completing a given project. A Gantt chart is a type of bar chart that illustrates a project schedule, while Resource leveling is a technique used to adjust the project schedule and ensure that the use of project resources are balanced out.