Task Coordination

Correct Answer: Break the complex task into smaller, manageable sub-tasks and coordinate their completion.

Break the complex task into smaller, manageable sub-tasks and coordinate their completion is the best strategy because it allows you to control and understand progress in a more detailed manner. Each piece of the larger task can be assigned to people best equipped to handle it, speeding up the development process and reducing the risk of further delays. Omitting the complex feature can potentially devalue the app and doesn't solve the root problem of dealing with complexity. Allocating this task to a new and inexperienced team would likely increase the chances of delays due to lack of familiarity with the task and can lead to quality issues. Proceeding without any changes in the plan when you're already facing delays is not prudent project management as the same approach is unlikely to produce different results.

Correct Answer: Convene a meeting with key stakeholders to discuss the delay, seek their input for alternative solutions, and address the community's concerns by explaining the project's benefits and mitigation strategies for their daily activities.

The best course of action is to convene a meeting with key stakeholders to discuss the delay, seek their input for alternative solutions, and address the community's concerns by explaining the project's benefits and mitigation strategies for their daily activities. As a project manager, it is crucial to engage with stakeholders, especially when faced with challenges that could impact the project's progress and reputation. By bringing everyone together, you can foster open communication, gather valuable insights, and collectively brainstorm solutions to the machinery delay issue. Additionally, addressing the community's concerns head-on demonstrates transparency and a willingness to find a mutually beneficial resolution. Postponing addressing the community's concerns until the machinery issue is resolved may further escalate tensions and lead to more significant delays down the line. Allocating additional resources to expedite the machinery delivery without engaging with stakeholders could be seen as a unilateral decision that disregards their input and concerns. Issuing an official statement to the local community asserting the project's benefits without engaging in a dialogue may come across as dismissive and fail to address their specific concerns adequately.

Correct Answer: Implement a RACI chart to clearly define roles and responsibilities.

Implementing a RACI chart is an effective strategy to enhance task coordination among multidisciplinary teams. The RACI chart stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed. By clearly defining who is Responsible for executing tasks, who is Accountable for the task's overall success, who should be Consulted during the process, and who needs to be Informed of the outcomes, this tool helps in reducing duplication of work and filling gaps in responsibility. The RACI chart aligns with the stakeholder engagement and resource management considerations in the PMBOK Guide to ensure that all team members are clear on their roles and responsibilities and how they fit into the larger project objectives. The other answers, while also useful in enhancing communication and collaboration, do not directly address the issue of role clarification and task synchronization as effectively as a RACI chart does. Daily stand-up meetings, while they do improve communication, may not resolve the underlying issues of role clarity and responsibility. Increasing the frequency of performance reporting could lead to information overload and may not directly improve task coordination. Cross-functional workshops are beneficial for collaboration and problem-solving but do not inherently solve role definition and responsibility issues. Hence, while the other strategies are supportive, the RACI chart is more directly tailored to solving the stated problems in the project management scenario.