Nexus Framework

Correct Answer: Invest time in training and mentoring the team on the importance and value of Nexus specific events and roles to ensure overall success of the entire project.

The best course of action in this situation would be to invest time in training and mentoring the team on the importance and value of Nexus specific events and roles to ensure overall success of the entire project. This approach aligns with the Scrum Master's role as a servant leader, guide and coach for the team, investing in their growth and development to enable better performance Letting the team continue their work while they are producing high-quality increments does not address the main issue - lack of understanding and application of Nexus specific events or roles, which are vital for the smooth functioning of the Nexus Framework and can lead to issues down the line Forcing the team to immediately change their approach without any training or mentoring is definitely not a good option. This could lead to confusion, resistance, and eventually decreased productivity. It also goes against the spirit of Scrum, which favors learning and continuous improvement Assigning more tasks to this team simply due to their current high-quality increment production does not fit the context of the question. The problem here isn't the team's productivity, but their lack of understanding or application of Nexus specific events or roles. This approach also could overwhelm the team and affect their good performance.

Correct Answer: Raise the issue during the Nexus Sprint Review to enhance inspection and transparency about the integration challenges.

In the context of the Nexus Framework, which deals with scaling Scrum across multiple teams working on the same product, transparency and inspection are key. Raising the issue during the Nexus Sprint Review provides an opportune moment for all stakeholders to understand the impact of integration issues on the product increment. While organizing an additional retrospective or adjusting the Definition of Done might be helpful in some contexts, they do not directly address the immediate need for transparency and collaborative inspection across the involved teams. Similarly, relying solely on an Integration team for prioritization could segment the problem-solving process, potentially disregarding the holistic view and collaborative problem-solving ethos of Scrum and the Nexus Framework.

Correct Answer: Coach the Nexus Integration Team on self-organization and cross-functionality, highlighting the importance of supporting the Scrum Teams without directing their work.

The correct approach is to coach the Nexus Integration Team on the principles of self-organization and cross-functionality, emphasizing their role in supporting rather than directing the Scrum Teams. This approach fosters an environment where teams can collaborate more effectively without being micromanaged. The wrong answers, although related to Scrum and scaling it, either reinforce the issue, such as being too prescriptive, or misdirect the effort, like focusing too narrowly on issues or seeking external solutions without addressing the fundamental problem of the team's behavior.