Guide to Sprint Review and Retrospective

The Sprint Review and Retrospective are key components of the Scrum framework, a popular agile methodology. These events are crucial as they allow the Scrum Team to reflect on the past Sprint and make continuous improvements moving forward.

What is it?
The Sprint Review is a meeting where the Scrum Team and stakeholders collaborate on what was done in the Sprint. The team presents the completed Product Backlog items and the Product Owner explains what backlog items have been 'Done' and what has not. The entire group collaborates on what to do next.
The Sprint Retrospective, on the other hand, is a meeting held after the Sprint Review where the Scrum Team inspects itself and creates a plan for improvements to be taken during the next Sprint.

How does it work?
During the Sprint Review, the team discusses what went well, what problems they faced, and how those problems were solved or can be solved. The Sprint Retrospective focuses on reviewing the team's practices and agreeing on the changes that will increase their productivity.

Exam Tips:
When answering questions about the Sprint Review and Retrospective, it's important to:
- Understand the objective of each event
- Remember that both are crucially important for the Scrum Team's continuous improvement
- Identify the differences between the Sprint Review and the Sprint Retrospective
- In the Sprint Review, show understanding of the collaboration between the Scrum Team and stakeholders
- In the Sprint Retrospective, focus on self-inspection and the Scrum Team's plan for improvements

In conclusion, Sprint Review and Retrospective meetings are essential for implementing Scrum successfully. They are the team's opportunity to inspect and adapt, affirm their commitment to quality, and find better ways to work.