Sprint Review

5 minutes 5 Questions

The Sprint Review is held at the end of the Sprint to inspect the Increment and adapt the Product Backlog if required. It involves a meeting where the team, Scrum Master, product owner and potentially stakeholders or customers discuss the completed work, overall progress, and potentially update the…

Guide to Sprint Review & Exam Tips

What it is: The Sprint Review is an agile methodology event that occurs at the end of each sprint in Scrum practices. It's a meeting where the Scrum Team and stakeholders collaborate to understand the work that was done during the sprint.
Why it is important: The Sprint Review helps to inspect the Increment delivered in the sprint, provides feedback, and decides what to do next. It aims to adapt the product backlog for the next sprint based on this feedback.
How it works: The Sprint Review includes discussions on what's been achieved, unfinished tasks, and analyzing the product backlog. The demonstration of the new product increment to the stakeholders also occurs during this event.
Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Sprint Review: You must clear up any confusion between the Sprint Review and other scrum meetings like the Daily Scrum and Sprint Retrospective. Remember that the Sprint Review focuses on what the team has produced during the Sprint and includes a demonstration of the work. The team encourages feedback from the stakeholders, which helps the Product Owner to make decisions on the product backlog. Context is important, so pay attention to questions regarding the purpose of this meeting, and who attends it.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

PSM I - Sprint Review Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Sprint Review

Question 1

During the Sprint Review, the stakeholders express dissatisfaction with the overall performance of the team. They suggest that the team should increase their velocity and significantly bring more items into the sprint. As a ScrumMaster, how do you respond?

Propose to the stakeholders that increasing the length of the sprint might be a solution to include more items, thus indirectly satisfying their request for more output. Suggest setting up a meeting with stakeholders to negotiate which backlog items can be realistically completed in the next sprint, emphasizing sustainable development over increased velocity. Recommend that the team should consider using a burndown chart more effectively to manage stakeholder expectations regarding velocity and deliverables. Explain that while feedback is appreciated, velocity is an internal metric for the team to assess and adjust their capacity and that sudden increases can lead to burnout and decreased quality.

Correct Answer: Explain that while feedback is appreciated, velocity is an internal metric for the team to assess and adjust their capacity and that sudden increases can lead to burnout and decreased quality.

The correct answer emphasizes the importance of safeguarding the team's sustainable pace and quality of work, using velocity as an internal tool rather than succumbing to external pressure to increase it unsustainably. The first wrong answer suggests a negotiation about scope which could be perceived as reasonable but doesn't directly address the misunderstanding about velocity. The second wrong answer relates to using a burndown chart, which is a valid Scrum tool but doesn't address the core issue regarding velocity and stakeholders' misunderstanding. The third wrong answer misguides by suggesting a change in sprint length to meet stakeholder demands for increased output, which could lead to other significant issues and is not generally recommended without thorough team agreement and consideration of the implications.

Question 2

During the Sprint Review, a stakeholder suggests a way to optimize the code which the Product Owner agrees with. As it opens a new set of user stories, the team is worried about the impact on their future sprints. As ScrumMaster, what is the most appropriate action?

Instruct the Product Owner to reprioritize the entire Product Backlog to focus on optimizations for the next few Sprints. Advise the Development Team to incorporate the optimization suggestion into the current Sprint without affecting the Sprint Goal. Add the optimization suggestion as a new Product Backlog item to be prioritized and refined. Suggest postponing the current Sprint Review to evaluate the full impact of the optimization suggestion on the project timeline and budget.

Correct Answer: Add the optimization suggestion as a new Product Backlog item to be prioritized and refined.

The correct action as a ScrumMaster is to ensure that new ideas and suggestions are captured as Product Backlog items for future consideration, without disrupting the current sprint's focus or unduly influencing the Product Owner's prioritization decisions. Changing the current Sprint scope goes against Scrum principles, as does reprioritizing the entire backlog without proper refinement or postponing Sprint events to reassess project parameters based solely on one suggestion.

Question 3

During a Sprint Review, the Development Team realized that they had misunderstood the requirements of a user story. It has been developed but doesn't deliver the expected value. What should the ScrumMaster do?

Recommend the Development Team to conduct a separate meeting immediately after the Review to identify the right requirements, even if it means extending the Sprint duration. Instruct the team to halt the current Sprint, correct the misunderstanding, and then proceed with the planned work. Advise the Product Owner to remove the user story from the product backlog to prevent further misunderstanding. Encourage the team to adapt the user story for the next Sprint based on the feedback and insights gained.

Correct Answer: Encourage the team to adapt the user story for the next Sprint based on the feedback and insights gained.

In Scrum, the focus is on delivering value and continuous improvement. The correct approach is for the Scrum Master to encourage the team to adapt based on feedback, rather than removing the story, halting the Sprint, or extending the Sprint unnecessarily. This promotes agility and learning from mistakes without penalizing the Development Team, ensuring alignment with Scrum principles.

🎓 Unlock Premium Access

Professional Scrum Master I + ALL Certifications

🎓 Access to ALL Certifications: Study for any certification on our platform with one subscription
2149 Superior-grade Professional Scrum Master I practice questions
Unlimited practice tests across all certifications
Detailed explanations for every question
PSM I: 5 full exams plus all other certification exams
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund if unsatisfied
Risk-Free: 7-day free trial with all premium features!

Start Your Free 7-Day Trial