Kanban

Correct Answer: To help teams adapt and improve their processes based on regular performance reviews

The primary significance of establishing a feedback cadence in a Kanban system is to help teams adapt and improve their processes based on regular performance reviews. This is fundamental to continuous improvement (Kaizen) in Kanban. Regular feedback allows teams to: - Identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies - Implement process improvements - Adjust their methods based on empirical data - Foster a culture of continuous learning The other options are less accurate because: - Following pull system protocols is more about day-to-day operations rather than systemic improvement - Communication about milestones is important but not the primary purpose of feedback cadence - Adjusting WIP limits is just one specific aspect of process improvement, not the main significance of feedback cadence Feedback cadence serves as the foundation for evolutionary change and process optimization, making it essential for long-term success in Kanban implementations.

Correct Answer: Identify and address the bottlenecks in the workflow

The most appropriate approach in a Kanban context is to identify and address the bottlenecks in the workflow. This allows the team to find the root cause of the bottleneck and work towards resolving it, ensuring a smoother workflow. The other options aren't in line with Kanban's principles or don't directly solve the problem.

Correct Answer: Re-assign some tasks to available team members and split the work

In a Kanban environment, the best approach is to re-assign some tasks to available team members to split the work and maintain sustainable workloads. This ensures an even distribution of tasks and helps to manage the WIP limits effectively. The other options may cause new issues or don't directly address the problem.