Follow-up on Previous Retrospective

5 minutes 5 Questions

Follow-up on Previous Retrospective means actively reviewing the action items agreed during the last retrospective and discussing the results. It involves assessing whether the actions have been implemented, how they worked, and what changes they brought about. Following up is paramount for drawing…

Guide on Follow-up on Previous Retrospective in PSM I Scrum

The 'Follow-up on Previous Retrospective' is a key part of Agile and Scrum framework. It is vital in continuous improvement and learning.

What is it?
Following up on previous retrospectives is about revisiting the action items and strategies identified in past retrospectives and reviewing their progress, efficacy, and challenges encountered in implementation. It involves looking back, analyzing, and making decisions for the future.

Why it is important?
It's crucial because it ensures accountability, tracks progress, celebrates victories, and addresses what needs to be improved. It validates the effectiveness of the actions and provides insights on new improvements.

How it works?
During the start of the retrospective, the team reviews the actions decided in the last retrospective, discusses the progress, and sheds light on challenges faced. This enables the team to learn from their experiences and fosters a process of continuous improvement.

Exam Tips: Answering Questions on Follow-up on Previous Retrospective
Understanding follow-up on previous retrospective is essential for answering questions on this topic. Remember:
1. It's about building a culture of trust and continuous improvement
2. It involves revisiting past retrospectives for learning and improving
3. Each action item is reviewed to track progress and ascertain effectiveness. If it's not effective, a new action may be needed.
4. Exam questions might present a scenario where previous retrospectives aren't followed up on. Understand the potential negative effects of skipping this step.

Test mode:

Exam (Timed)

Practice (With explanations)

Start practice test

PSM I - Follow-up on Previous Retrospective Example Questions

Test your knowledge of Follow-up on Previous Retrospective

Question 1

After the last retrospective, the team decided to increase interaction with the Product Owner. In the next sprint, however, the interaction did not improve. How do you address this in the next retrospective?

Blame the Product Owner for the lack of communication. Discuss with the team and the Product Owner the issues preventing increased interaction and find a joint solution. Force the Product Owner to spend more time with the team. Ignore the issue as it is outside the Scrum Master's responsibilities.

Correct Answer: Discuss with the team and the Product Owner the issues preventing increased interaction and find a joint solution.

In a Scrum environment, communication and interaction are key players in the successful completion of a project. In the Professional Scrum Master I course, this is reiterated numerous times. When there is an issue like decreased interaction between the Product Owner and the team, the correct method to deal with it would not be to blame the Product Owner or to force the Product Owner to spend more time with the team as these methods do not promote healthy team communication. The correct action would be to open up an honest discussion with both the team and the Product Owner about the possible obstacles that are preventing this from happening and to work towards a jointly agreed solution, just as stated by the answer 'Discuss with the team and the Product Owner the issues preventing increased interaction and find a joint solution'. Ignoring the issue would also be inappropriate as it is the Scrum Master's responsibility to facilitate positive communication channels between the Product Owner and the team.

Question 2

Your team decided in the previous retrospective to work on improving task estimates. Despite their efforts, their estimates are still significantly off. How would you address this in the next retrospective?

Encourage the team to break down tasks into smaller, more manageable components, making it easier to estimate with more precision. This approach involves more detailed planning sessions where tasks are dissected into subtasks, and estimates are given based on these smaller pieces. The granularity helps in better understanding the complexity and time required, potentially leading to more accurate estimates. Introduce a session on comparative estimation techniques, such as using Fibonacci sequence for relative effort assessment. Assign a more experienced team member to take over the task of estimation to ensure higher accuracy. Implement a policy that penalizes inaccurate estimations to motivate the team to improve.

Correct Answer: Introduce a session on comparative estimation techniques, such as using Fibonacci sequence for relative effort assessment.

The correct answer focuses on improving estimation techniques in a collaborative and educational manner without assigning blame or increasing pressure on the team, which aligns with Agile principles. The wrong answers suggest punitive measures, reliance on individuals rather than the team, or extensive breakdown of tasks which might not address the root cause of inaccurate estimates and could potentially harm team dynamics and morale.

Question 3

In the Scrum framework, how should a Scrum Master address issues identified during a retrospective that have not been resolved by the next Sprint Retrospective?

Suggest that the team votes on which unresolved issues should be carried over to the next Sprint, deprioritizing the rest. Ensure the team reviews the list of previously unresolved impediments, collaboratively deciding on next actions and owners for each. Assign the responsibility of resolving all unresolved issues to a single team member to ensure accountability and progress. Advocate for the creation of a separate backlog for unresolved issues, to be revisited only when the Product Backlog items are under control.

Correct Answer: Ensure the team reviews the list of previously unresolved impediments, collaboratively deciding on next actions and owners for each.

The correct approach in Scrum involves the Scrum Master ensuring collaboration and empowerment of the Development Team to address and prioritize unresolved impediments. Assigning issues to a single team member undermines the collaborative nature of Scrum. Voting on unresolved issues may neglect important impediments that need addressing. Creating a separate backlog for unresolved issues contradicts Scrum practices which emphasize dealing with impediments promptly and efficiently, focusing on impediments that may directly impact the Sprint Goal first.

🎓 Unlock Premium Access

Professional Scrum Master I + ALL Certifications

🎓 Access to ALL Certifications: Study for any certification on our platform with one subscription
2149 Superior-grade Professional Scrum Master I practice questions
Unlimited practice tests across all certifications
Detailed explanations for every question
PSM I: 5 full exams plus all other certification exams
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed: Full refund if unsatisfied
Risk-Free: 7-day free trial with all premium features!

Start Your Free 7-Day Trial

More Follow-up on Previous Retrospective questions

6 questions (total)

Start 6 question test